Literature DB >> 31840652

A cardiac and subcutaneous canine dirofilariosis outbreak in a kennel in central France.

Younes Laidoudi1, David Ringot2, Stéphanie Watier-Grillot3, Bernard Davoust4, Oleg Mediannikov1.   

Abstract

Canine dirofilarioses are nematode infections caused by two species of the genus Dirofilaria: D. immitis and D. repens. We describe here an outbreak of D. immitis and D. repens infection in military working dogs (MWDs) housed in a kennel in the Indre department (centre of France). Out of a total of 17 dogs, 6 (35.2%) tested positive for D. immitis, D. repens or both parasites. Infested dogs were treated and prophylactic measures were implemented for the entire kennel staff. To our knowledge, this is the first documented description of an outbreak of canine cardiopulmonary dirofilariasis in the center of France, unlike in the south of this country, where D. immitis and D. repens dirofilariasis are enzootic. In France, as mosquito vectors expand their territory and new non-native vectors are introduced, it is likely that the distribution area of these two diseases of domestic and wild carnivores will be wider and underestimated. © Y. Laidoudi et al., published by EDP Sciences, 2019.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dirofilaria immitis; Dirofilaria repens; France; Heartworm disease; Military working dog; PCR

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31840652      PMCID: PMC6913249          DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2019073

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Parasite        ISSN: 1252-607X            Impact factor:   3.000


Introduction

Dirofilaria immitis (Leidy, 1856) [23] and Dirofilaria repens Railliet & Henry, 1911 [33] are mosquito-borne filarioids (Nematoda: Onchocercidae) infecting wild and domestic mammals of different orders with canids as the predominant definitive hosts. Adult worms of D. immitis with a smooth cuticle (measuring between 12 cm and 30 cm in length) colonize the pulmonary arteries and right heart cavities, whereas adult worms of D. repens, with a finely striated cuticle, (measuring between 5 cm and 17 cm in length) are located in the subcutaneous tissues [11, 26, 28]. About 120 days after infection of the mammalian host, the viviparous female can be fertilized and produces mobile embryos called microfilariae. Microfilariae (L1 stage) parasitize the blood until being ingested by the mosquito vector (Culicidae) during a blood meal taken on a microfilaremic host. Inside the vector, microfilariae first develop into larval stage 1 (L1), then molt into larval stage 2 (L2), and finally molt into third-stage larvae (L3), which is the infective stage. Clinically, D. immitis infection (canine heartworm disease) can remain unapparent for a long time. Symptoms are mainly dominated by right heart failure, ranging from exercise intolerance and fatigue to cardiac decompensation with swelling and possible acute pulmonary oedema [12, 26, 29]. In contrast, the infestation by D. repens often passes unnoticed. Dogs infected with D. repens microfilariae may sometimes develop subcutaneous nodules where adult worms encyst. Sometimes, the disease manifests with more symptoms, such as pruritus and skin changes [38]. Canine dirofilariosis has been known in France for a long time. It was in 1679 that Panhot highlighted heartworm in a dog native to the Dombes region (near Lyon) [30]. Over the last century, several studies have shown the importance of this parasitosis in the Mediterranean region [8, 18]. At the beginning of the 1980s, the infestation rate of military working dogs (MWDs) was high, particularly in Corsica and the Bouches-du-Rhône department [5, 8]. Out of 180 MWDs tested in 1988, 67 (37%) carried microfilariae in the blood, including 17 cases of D. immitis, 2 of D. repens, 15 mixed infestations and 3 doubtful ones [5]. A screening test carried out on 85 MWDs from northern France (Brittany and Normandy) was negative [6]. The MWDs with heartworm disease may lose their operational fitness, causing an operational impact for the Armed Forces. In fact, MWDs military dogs are used for the detection of explosive devices as well as to secure military sites. The eradication of canine heartworm disease among military dogs in south-eastern France was made possible by the implementation, for the first time in France, of chemoprophylaxis based on the use of ivermectin, completed by a conclusive trial on the efficacy of melarsomine in treating adult Dirofilaria [4]. The first demonstration of the long-term effectiveness of this protocol was made in 2015 by comparing the incidence rates of D. immitis infestation in MWDs from a kennel located in Corsica and in co-located civilian dogs (the civilian kennel was less than 15 km from the military kennel). The estimated prevalence in civilian dogs was 40.4% (19/47), while no cases were identified in MWDs [36]. Currently, canine dirofilarioses chemoprophylaxis is applied to all MWDs deployed on missions outside mainland France, as well as to MWDs from mainland France located in south-eastern France, during the period of vector activity (May–November). In the present study, we revealed the existence of an indigenous outbreak of D. immitis and D. repens infestation in the French department of Indre. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first documented description of an outbreak of canine cardiopulmonary dirofilariosis in this region of France.

Materials and methods

Dogs

In October 2018, we performed blood tests on the 17 apparently healthy dogs in the military kennel located near the city of Rosnay (46°42′47″N, 1°14′39″E), in Indre, central France. The commune is located in the “Parc naturel régional de la Brenne”. The MWDs, including 11 Belgian Malinois and 6 German Shepherds, were all males aged 2–10 years, with a median of 5 years. The duration of the dogs’ presence in the kennel ranged from 6 months to 8.5 years, with a median of 4 years. MWDs, including dogs from the Rosnay kennel, are purchased abroad, mainly in eastern European countries (Germany and Poland, in particular). They arrived at the kennel at about 2 years of age. They received regular veterinary care. From May to October, they benefit from a treatment against ectoparasites, but which has no repellent effect on mosquitoes. For the purpose of the study, two blood samples of 4–5 mL volume were taken from each dog and collected from a dry tube and a citrated tube, respectively. Serum was collected after centrifugation (10 min, 3000 g). Each animal sampled was examined clinically.

Ethics statement

Blood samples were collected in accordance with the requirements of the Animal Ethics Procedures of French veterinarians and with the consent of the owner of the animals (French Armed Forces).

Direct detection of microfilariae

Modified Knott’s staining was chosen to identify canine blood microfilaria [21, 25]. One millilitre of citrated blood was mixed with 9 mL of hemolyzing solution (2% acetic acid) in a 15 mL tube, followed by centrifugation for minutes at 500 rpm. The supernatant was removed; the sediment was stained with methylene-blue, transferred to a slide, and covered with a cover slip.

Heartworm antigen detection

Heartworm antigen detection was performed using two rapid diagnostic serological tests marketed in France and targeting the antigen secreted by the adult female worm: (i) a WITNESS® Dirofilaria test (Zoetis, Lyon, France), based on immunomigration (RIM®) technology, and (ii) a DiroCHEK® test (Zoetis, Lyon, France), based on an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method known as a sandwich ELISA. Both tests provide rapid results, as well as high sensitivity (99% for WITNESS® Dirofilaria and 98% for DiroCHEK®) and specificity (94% for WITNESS® Dirofilaria and 96% for DiroCHEK®) [17].

Molecular detection of filaria and the Wolbachia endosymbiont of filaria

DNA was extracted from 100 μL of citrated blood, after 4-hour digestion at 56 °C, using an equal volume of buffer G2 supplemented with 15% proteinase K. The extraction was performed using the Biorobot EZ1 System with the EZ1 DNA tissue kit (Qiagen, Courtaboeuf, France), in line with the manufacturer’s instructions. DNA was eluted in a final volume of 100 μL and stored at −20 °C. All samples were screened for filaria and their Wolbachia complex, using the fast typing approach which consists in a pan-filarial 28S-based qPCR system, followed by a triplex COI-based system targeting D. immitis, D. repens and Acanthocheilonema reconditum, and the duplex ftsZ-based system, targeting specifically the Wolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis and that of D. repens (Table 1) [22]. Once the specific filarial DNA has been revealed by the qPCR triplex, the sample is considered positive, and the detection of Wolbachia DNA confirms infection by D. immitis or D. repens related to this strain.
Table 1

Primers and probes used in this study.

System namePrimer & probe nameSequences 5′–3′SpecificityReferences
Pan-fil 28S qPCR-based systemqFil-28S-FTTGTTTGAGATTGCAGCCCAFilariae[22]
qFil-28S-P6FAM-5′-CAAGTACCGTGAGGGAAAGT-3′-TAMRA
qFil-28S-RGTTTCCATCTCAGCGGTTTC
All-Wol 16S qPCR-based systemall.Wol.16S.301-FTGGAACTGAGATACGGTCCAGWolbachieae
all.Wol.16S.347-P6FAM-5′-AATATTGGACAATGGGCGAA-3′-TAMRA
all.Wol.16S.478-RGCACGGAGTTAGCCAGGACT
Triplex TaqMan COI qPCR-based systemFil.COI.749-FCATCCTGAGGTTTATGTTATTATTTT
D.imm.COI.777-P6FAM-CGGTGTTTGGGATTGTTAGTG-TAMRADirofilaria immitis
D.rep.COI.871-P6VIC-TGCTGTTTTAGGTACTTCTGTTTGAG-TAMRADirofilaria repens
A.rec.COI.866-PCy5-TGAATTGCTGTACTGGGAACT-BHQ-3Acanthocheilonema reconditum
Fil.COI.914-RCWGTATACATATGATGRCCYCA
Duplex Wol-Diro ftsZ qPCR-based systemWDiro.ftsZ.490-FAAGCCATTTRGCTTYGAAGGTGWolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitis and D. repens
WDimm.ftsZ.523-P6FAM-CGTATTGCAGAGCTCGGATTA-TAMRA
WDrep.ftsZ.525-P6VIC-CATTGCAGAACTGGGACTGG-TAMRA
WDiro.ftsZ.600-RAAACAAGTTTTGRTTTGGAATAACAAT
Duplex HWs COI qPCR-based systemHw.COI.723-FTCAGCATTTGTTTTGGTTTTT
D.imm.COI.777-P6FAM-CGGTGTTTGGGATTGTTAGTG-TAMRAD. immitis
A.vas.COI.813-P6VIC-TGACTGGGAAGAAGGAGGTG-TAMRAAngiostrongylus vasorum
Hw.COI.950-RGCASTAAAATAAGYACGAGWATC
Pan-Nematoda primers 18S PCR-based systemFwd.18S.631TCGTCATTGCTGCGGTTAAANematodaThis study
Rwd.18S.1825rGGTTCAAGCCACTGCGATTAA
Primers and probes used in this study.

Sequencing analysis and phylogenetic genotyping of filaria

Samples harbouring a single DNA of filaria were subjected to sequencing analysis. The pan-Nematoda primers named Fwd.18S.631 & Rwd.18S.1825r (Table 1) were designed and customized to amplify an 1127–1155-bp fragment from the 18S rRNA gene. PCR reactions were carried out in a total volume of 50 μL, consisting of 25 μL of AmpliTaq Gold master mix, 18 μL of ultra-purified water DNAse-RNAse free, 1 μL of each primer and 5 μL of DNA template. The thermal cycling conditions were: incubation step at 95 °C for 15 min, 40 cycles of 1 min at 95 °C, 30 s at 54 °C for the melting temperature, and one and half minutes for the elongation time at 72 °C, followed by a final extension of 5 min at 72 °C. PCR amplification was performed in a Peltier PTC-200 model thermal cycler (MJ Research Inc., Watertown, MA, USA). The DNA generated through the PCR reaction was purified by filtration using a NucleoFast® 96 PCR DNA purification plate, and was then amplified using a BigDye® Terminator v3.1 Cycle Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). The BigDye PCR products were purified on the Sephadex G-50 Superfine gel filtration resin prior to sequencing on the ABI Prism 3130XL. Nucleotide sequences were assembled and corrected using ChromasPro 2.0.0, then aligned against close reference sequences of filarioids species, representative members of Onchocercidae available in GenBank. The alignment was performed using the ClustalW application within BioEdit v.7.2.5 [16]. The maximum likelihood phylogenetic tree was inferred on MEGA6 [37], based on the Kimura 3-substitution-type model [20].

Results and discussion

Table 2 presents the results of the nine analyses carried out on the blood of 17 MWDs of the Rosnay kennel. For canine dirofilariosis, we observed 35.2% (6/17) positive dogs. The Knott test conducted on dog No. 3 revealed the presence of D. immitis microfilariae. DNA and Wolbachia complex qPCRs tests as well as the two serological tests gave positive results. Five dogs had mixed infestation with D. immitis and D. repens (dogs Nos. 2, 7, 8, 10 and 13). Dirofilaria repens DNA was identified in dogs Nos. 2, 10 and 13. Furthermore, both Wolbachia genotypes known to be associated with D. immitis and D. repens were also detected in the same samples. Two samples (Nos. 2 and 13) provided positive results with both serological tests. One dog (No. 7) was positive for both D. immitis and D. repens microfilariae by the Knott test, the PCR test for both Dirofilaria and Wolbachia DNA, and by ELISA; whereas, it was negative by the immunomigration test. Finally, dog No. 8 was positive for D. immitis and D. repens and Wolbachia DNA; and for both serological tests. All samples were free of A. reconditum infection.
Table 2

Screening for dirofilariosis in a military kennel in the Indre department (central France).

Dog number (No.)Breed*Age (year)Kennel presence time (year)Parasitological diagnosis: Knott testSerological screening
Molecular detection of filarial DNA using the qPCR Pan-Filaria 28SGenotyping: 18S rRNA geneMolecular identification of filarial species using a COI Triplex qPCR-based system
Molecular identification of Wolbachia genotypes using ftsZ duplex qPCR-based system
Diagnosis
Witness® DirofilariaDiroCHEK®Dirofilaria immitisDirofilaria repensAcanthocheilonema reconditumWolbachia endosymbiont of D. immitisWolbachia endosymbiont of D. repens
1BSM108.5Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NE**Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
2BSM76D. repensPos.Pos.Pos.D. repensNeg.Pos.Neg.Pos.Pos.Occult heartworm and subcutaneous dirofilariosis
3GS65D. immitisPos.Pos.Pos.D. immitisPos.Neg.Neg.Pos.Neg.Heartworm disease
4BSM65Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
5BSM65Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
6BSM6.55Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
7GS64D. immitis + D. repensNeg.Pos.Pos.NEPos.Pos.Neg.Pos.Pos.Heartworm and subcutaneous dirofilariosis
8BSM4.53Neg.Neg.Neg.Pos.NEPos.Pos.Neg.Pos.Pos.Occult heartworm and subcutaneous dirofilariosis
9GS3.52.5Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
10BSM42D. repensNeg.Neg.Pos.D. repensNeg.Pos.Neg.Pos.Pos.Occult heartworm and subcutaneous dirofilariosis
11BSM32Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
12GS32Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
13GS41.5D. repensPos.Pos.Pos.D. repensNeg.Pos.Neg.Pos.Pos.Occult heartworm and subcutaneous dirofilariosis
14GS2.51.5Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
15BSM3.51Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
16BSM20.5Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog
17BSM20.5Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.NENeg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Neg.Healthy dog

BSM: Belgian shepherd malinois, GS: German shepherd.

NE: Not evaluated.

Screening for dirofilariosis in a military kennel in the Indre department (central France). BSM: Belgian shepherd malinois, GS: German shepherd. NE: Not evaluated. Four partial sequences of the 18S rRNA gene have been successfully generated from samples identified as positive for a single DNA of filaria. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that dog No. 3 was infected with D. immitis, having 100% identity with D. immitis isolated from foxes in France (Marseille) (MK673809, MK673810) and 99.9% with that isolated from dogs in Japan (AB973231). Three D. repens sequences were 100% identical both to each other and to D. repens isolated from humans in Japan (Fig. 1).
Figure 1

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rRNA gene, using the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 3-substitution-type model.

Molecular phylogenetic analysis of the 18S rRNA gene, using the maximum likelihood method based on the Kimura 3-substitution-type model. Dog No. 7 died suddenly in November 2018 (1 month after blood sampling for our study) because of a stomach dilation-torsion. The necropsy performed on this dog revealed the presence in the right heart of four females and two males of D. immitis (Fig. 2). The heart was not dilated.
Figure 2

Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in the right ventricle of dog No. 7.

Heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) in the right ventricle of dog No. 7. It is known that heartworm can occur as an occult infestation, resulting in the presence of at least one mature female (or male) of D. immitis, without circulating microfilariae. Occult infestations occur in several situations, including monosexual infestation by male or female worms only, infertility of female worms, low infestation levels and/or destruction of microfilariae due to the host’s immune response [35]. In our study, the proportion of occult infestation among dogs infected by D. immitis was 66.6% (4/6). The detection of occult infections is usually based on adult worm antigen testing [24]. However, in areas endemic for both D. immitis and D. repens, the reliability of these tests decreases, due to two main factors: (i) cross-reaction of rapid diagnostic tests between D. immitis and other parasites, including D. repens, and (ii) the immunosuppressive capacity of D. repens over D. immitis microfilariae, which hinders diagnosis based on the detection of blood microfilariae [14]. Adulticide treatment of D. immitis dirofilariasis, according to the protocol recommended by the American Heartworm Society, was effective against D. repens [28]. The approach combining the specific detection of molecular markers of D. immitis and D. repens showed 100% and 99.3% sensitivity and specificity, respectively. The reliability of the method is not reduced, even in case of occult dirofilariasis possibly accompanied by infestation by other filaroid species like Acanthocheilonema reconditum, leading to false positives following cross-reactions of rapid detection tests for D. immitis antigens [24]. This is coherent with the results obtained in our study, where occult heartworm infection associated with circulating microfilariae of D. repens was observed in 60% (3/5) of Dirofilaria spp. coinfected dogs, of which only 40% (2/5) were positive for D. immitis antigen. Canine filarial infections have increased significantly in recent years [35]. This trend is the consequence of the increase in the range of vectors, as well as the introduction of infected dogs, reservoirs of parasites, into ecosystems favourable to the emergence of secondary indigenous outbreaks. The geographical distribution of heartworm disease and subcutaneous dirofilariosis in France is not precisely known. However, several studies reported that D. repens is more endemic and spreads more rapidly than D. immitis within northern and eastern Europe [2, 3, 14, 31, 36]. These differences in the epidemiology of the two parasite species could be explained by the fact that in areas where D. repens is widespread, the progression of D. immitis would be hindered, and vice versa [14]. Outbreaks of D. immitis have also been reported in western France, they concerned hunting dogs living in kennels near ponds [6, 7]. In our study, the military kennel is located in an infertile swampy area near seven ponds. The local ecosystem is highly favourable to the development of dirofilariosis vectors. Aedes (Stegomyia) albopictus, more commonly known as the “tiger mosquito”, has been introduced into metropolitan France from Italy and is now present throughout the south of the country, as well as in regions further north, including the Paris region and the department of Indre since 2017 [27]. This highly invasive and anthropophilic mosquito is known to be a competent vector of dirofilariosis parasites and to be implicated in the transmission of dirofilariosis in the studied area and most likely contributed to the infection of the military dogs considered in this study [36]. In southern Italy, the worrying increase in the proportion of mosquitoes infected by D. immitis among A. albopictus populations is associated with an increased risk of infestation of dogs with this parasite [15]. An integrated approach to control dirofilariosis vectors and to reduce infection sources and reservoirs for the parasite should be implemented in these areas. In the highly endemic area, the multi-modal prophylactic strategy, consisting in the administration of macrocyclic lactones and the application of repellents effective against mosquitoes, appears to be a tailored strategy. A wide range of mammalian hosts, including humans and cats, can be infected by both D. immitis and D. repens, resulting from their low host specificity. Human infestation by D. immitis results in a pulmonary form (nodules), the most severe but less frequent form, which is found mainly in southern Europe (Italy, Spain, Greece, etc.) [13]. In France, most cases of human dirofilariasis caused by D. immitis are reported in endemic regions, such as Corsica and the Bouches-du-Rhône department [9, 32]. In humans, like in dogs, D. repens causes subcutaneous filariasis [1, 19]. We report here for the first time, an outbreak of canine dirofilariosis (D. repens and D. immitis) in the Rosnay military kennel, with a health risk for military personnel and military dogs in this area. In late 2018, after the detection of several infected dogs in the kennel, the following management measures were implemented: all dogs infected by D. immitis and cases of mixed infection (N = 6), except one that died before the treatment was administered (dog No. 7), received adulticide (melarsomine), combined with larvicide treatment (ivermectin), doxycycline and glucocorticosteroids (prednisone), according to the treatment protocol recommended by the American Heartworm Society [28]. During treatment, a restriction on physical activity was prescribed. This treatment eliminated D. repens and D. immitis larvae, as well as Wolbachia complex and the existing susceptible larvae. Moreover, all infected dogs were treated with insecticidal repellent effective against mosquitoes during the period of vector activity (from May to November in mainland France). The aim was to prevent secondary cases and outbreaks, in the presence of competent vectors in the area where the military kennel is located.

Conclusions

The epidemiology of dirofilariosis infections is complex and has even been related to the concept of the episystem, represented by the multiple interactions between climate, environment, animals, humans and parasites [34]. As these are zoonoses, physicians and veterinarians must be informed of the risks of transmission in the regions, and especially the local biotopes [10]. We suggest that epidemiological investigations of vectors and canine dirofilariasis be implemented in areas at risk of exposure. Moreover, we suggest implementation of prevention against D. immitis and D. repens infection in dogs, using macrocyclic lactones [35], in combination with a repellent effective against mosquitoes (permethrin or deltamethrin-based products), as recommended for heartworm prevention in the affected and surrounding areas [28].
  24 in total

1.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

2.  Molecular survey of Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens by new real-time TaqMan® PCR assay in dogs and mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Corsica (France).

Authors:  Djamel Tahir; Fadi Bittar; Hélène Barré-Cardi; Doudou Sow; Mustapha Dahmani; Oleg Mediannikov; Didier Raoult; Bernard Davoust; Philippe Parola
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2017-01-08       Impact factor: 2.738

Review 3.  [Dirofilariasis, an emerging and underestimated zoonoses in France].

Authors:  C P Raccurt
Journal:  Med Trop (Mars)       Date:  1999

Review 4.  Human and animal dirofilariasis: the emergence of a zoonotic mosaic.

Authors:  Fernando Simón; Mar Siles-Lucas; Rodrigo Morchón; Javier González-Miguel; Isabel Mellado; Elena Carretón; Jose Alberto Montoya-Alonso
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 26.132

5.  Changing climate and changing vector-borne disease distribution: the example of Dirofilaria in Europe.

Authors:  Claudio Genchi; Michele Mortarino; Laura Rinaldi; Giuseppe Cringoli; Giorgio Traldi; Marco Genchi
Journal:  Vet Parasitol       Date:  2011-01-19       Impact factor: 2.738

6.  Cutaneous and pulmonary dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria repens.

Authors:  M Benzaquen; D Brajon; M Delord; N Yin; F Bittar; I Toga; P Berbis; P Parola
Journal:  Br J Dermatol       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 9.302

7.  Evidences of increasing risk of dirofilarioses in southern Italy.

Authors:  A Giangaspero; M Marangi; M S Latrofa; D Martinelli; D Traversa; D Otranto; C Genchi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 2.289

Review 8.  Heartworm disease in animals and humans.

Authors:  John W McCall; Claudio Genchi; Laura H Kramer; Jorge Guerrero; Luigi Venco
Journal:  Adv Parasitol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.870

9.  Clinical Aspects of Dermatitis Associated with Dirofilaria repens in Pets: A Review of 100 Canine and 31 Feline Cases (1990-2010) and a Report of a New Clinic Case Imported from Italy to Dubai.

Authors:  Walter Tarello
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2011-12-13

10.  Subcutaneous infection with Dirofilaria immitis nematode in human, France.

Authors:  Maud Foissac; Matthieu Million; Charles Mary; Jean-Philippe Dales; Jean-Baptiste Souraud; Renaud Piarroux; Philippe Parola
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 6.883

View more
  10 in total

1.  Estimated specific antibody-based true sero-prevalences of canine filariosis in dogs in Central Europe and the UK.

Authors:  Paul Torgerson; Peter Deplazes; Jeannine E Fehr; Manuela Schnyder; Deborah E Joekel; Nikola Pantchev; Mindaugas Sarkunas
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 2.383

2.  Dirofilaria immitis and Dirofilaria repens in mosquitoes from Corsica Island, France.

Authors:  Laidoudi Younes; Hélène Barré-Cardi; Samia Bedjaoui; Nazli Ayhan; Marie Varloud; Oleg Mediannikov; Domenico Otranto; Bernard Davoust
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-08-26       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Haematological and biochemical abnormalities in hunting dogs infected with Acanthocheilonema reconditum, associated risk factors, and a European overview.

Authors:  Laura Pacifico; Nicola Ferrari; Claudia Romeo; Francesco Buono; Paolo Varuzza; Giovanni Sgroi; Benedetto Neola; Jesse Buch; Melissa Beall; Edward B Breitschwerdt; Ramaswamy Chandrashekar; Vincenzo Veneziano; Diego Piantedosi
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.289

4.  Detection of Canine Vector-Borne Filariasis and Their Wolbachia Endosymbionts in French Guiana.

Authors:  Younes Laidoudi; Jean-Lou Marie; Djamel Tahir; Stéphanie Watier-Grillot; Oleg Mediannikov; Bernard Davoust
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2020-05-21

5.  Zoonotic Abbreviata caucasica in Wild Chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes verus) from Senegal.

Authors:  Younes Laidoudi; Hacène Medkour; Maria Stefania Latrofa; Bernard Davoust; Georges Diatta; Cheikh Sokhna; Amanda Barciela; R Adriana Hernandez-Aguilar; Didier Raoult; Domenico Otranto; Oleg Mediannikov
Journal:  Pathogens       Date:  2020-06-27

6.  Detection of heartworm antigen without cross-reactivity to helminths and protozoa following heat treatment of canine serum.

Authors:  Jeff M Gruntmeir; Nina M Thompson; Maureen T Long; Byron L Blagburn; Heather D S Walden
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.876

7.  A study on canine dirofilariasis in selected areas of Sri Lanka.

Authors:  Randima Dasanayake; Thivya Balendran; Dhilma Atapattu; Devika Iddawela
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2022-04-14

8.  Prevalence and molecular characterization of Dirofilaria immitis in road killed canids of northern Iran.

Authors:  Meysam Sharifdini; Mahan Karimi; Keyhan Ashrafi; Mostafa Soleimani; Hamed Mirjalali
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 2.792

9.  Oral migration of Dirofilaria repens after creeping dermatitis.

Authors:  Quentin Hennocq; Aloïs Helary; Alexandre Debelmas; Gentiane Monsel; Amandine Labat; Chloé Bertolus; Coralie Martin; Eric Caumes
Journal:  Parasite       Date:  2020-03-18       Impact factor: 3.000

10.  Multiple vector-borne pathogens of domestic animals in Egypt.

Authors:  Hend H A M Abdullah; Nadia Amanzougaghene; Handi Dahmana; Meriem Louni; Didier Raoult; Oleg Mediannikov
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-09-29
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.