Literature DB >> 31837536

12 versus 24 h bed rest after acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis: a preliminary experience.

Brian Silver1, Tariq Hamid2, Muhib Khan3, Mario Di Napoli4, Reza Behrouz5, Gustavo Saposnik6, Jo-Ann Sarafin7, Susan Martin8, Majaz Moonis9, Nils Henninger10, Richard Goddeau9, Adalia Jun-O'Connell9, Shawna M Cutting11, Ali Saad11, Shadi Yaghi12, Wiley Hall13, Susanne Muehlschlegel13, Raphael Carandang13, Marcey Osgood13, Bradford B Thompson14, Corey R Fehnel15, Linda C Wendell16, N Stevenson Potter14, James M Gilchrist17, Bruce Barton18.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The practice of ≥24 h of bed rest after acute ischemic stroke thrombolysis is common among hospitals, but its value compared to shorter periods of bed rest is unknown.
METHODS: Consecutive adult patients with a diagnosis of ischemic stroke who had received intravenous thrombolysis treatment from 1/1/2010 until 4/13/2016, identified from the local ischemic stroke registry, were included. Standard practice bed rest for ≥24 h, the protocol prior to 1/27/2014, was retrospectively compared with standard practice bed rest for ≥12 h, the protocol after that date. The primary outcome was favorable discharge location (defined as home, home with services, or acute rehabilitation). Secondary outcome measures included incidence of pneumonia, NIHSS at discharge, and length of stay.
RESULTS: 392 patients were identified (203 in the ≥24 h group, 189 in the ≥12 h group). There was no significant difference in favorable discharge outcome in the ≥24 h bed rest protocol compared with the ≥12 h bed rest protocol in multivariable logistic regression analysis (76.2% vs. 70.9%, adjusted OR 1.20 CI 0.71-2.03). Compared with the ≥24 h bed rest group, pneumonia rates (8.3% versus 1.6%, adjusted OR 0.12 CI 0.03-0.55), median discharge NIHSS (3 versus 2, adjusted p = .034), and mean length of stay (5.4 versus 3.5 days, adjusted p = .006) were lower in the ≥12 h bed rest group.
CONCLUSION: Compared with ≥24 h bed rest, ≥12 h bed rest after acute ischemic stroke reperfusion therapy appeared to be similar. A non-inferiority randomized trial is needed to verify these findings.
Copyright © 2019. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31837536      PMCID: PMC7250250          DOI: 10.1016/j.jns.2019.116618

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurol Sci        ISSN: 0022-510X            Impact factor:   3.181


  22 in total

1.  Medical complications after stroke: a multicenter study.

Authors:  P Langhorne; D J Stott; L Robertson; J MacDonald; L Jones; C McAlpine; F Dick; G S Taylor; G Murray
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 7.914

2.  Optical bedside monitoring of cerebral blood flow in acute ischemic stroke patients during head-of-bed manipulation.

Authors:  Christopher G Favilla; Rickson C Mesquita; Michael Mullen; Turgut Durduran; Xiangping Lu; Meeri N Kim; David L Minkoff; Scott E Kasner; Joel H Greenberg; Arjun G Yodh; John A Detre
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-03-20       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Discharge destination as a surrogate for Modified Rankin Scale defined outcomes at 3- and 12-months poststroke among stroke survivors.

Authors:  Adnan I Qureshi; Saqib A Chaudhry; Biggya L Sapkota; Gustavo J Rodriguez; M Fareed K Suri
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 3.966

4.  Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial.

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Costs of hospitalization for stroke patients aged 18-64 years in the United States.

Authors:  Guijing Wang; Zefeng Zhang; Carma Ayala; Diane O Dunet; Jing Fang; Mary G George
Journal:  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 2.136

6.  Early Mobilization After Stroke Is Not Associated With Cognitive Outcome.

Authors:  Toby B Cumming; Julie Bernhardt; Danielle Lowe; Janice Collier; Helen Dewey; Peter Langhorne; Amanda G Thrift; Ashleigh Green; Rajkumar Mohanraj; Sharon F Kramer; Leonid Churilov; Thomas Linden
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 7.  Head position and cerebral blood flow velocity in acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Verónica V Olavarría; Hisatomi Arima; Craig S Anderson; Alejandro M Brunser; Paula Muñoz-Venturelli; Stephane Heritier; Pablo M Lavados
Journal:  Cerebrovasc Dis       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 2.762

8.  A very early rehabilitation trial for stroke (AVERT): phase II safety and feasibility.

Authors:  Julie Bernhardt; Helen Dewey; Amanda Thrift; Janice Collier; Geoffrey Donnan
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 7.914

9.  Does the prevention of complications explain the survival benefit of organized inpatient (stroke unit) care?: further analysis of a systematic review.

Authors:  Lindsay Govan; Peter Langhorne; Christopher J Weir
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2007-08-09       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Interrupted time series regression for the evaluation of public health interventions: a tutorial.

Authors:  James Lopez Bernal; Steven Cummins; Antonio Gasparrini
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  1 in total

1.  Effectiveness of ambulation to prevent venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to hospital: a systematic review.

Authors:  Brandyn D Lau; Patrick Murphy; Anthony J Nastasi; Stella Seal; Peggy S Kraus; Deborah B Hobson; Dauryne L Shaffer; Christine G Holzmueller; Jonathan K Aboagye; Michael B Streiff; Elliott R Haut
Journal:  CMAJ Open       Date:  2020-12-08
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.