BACKGROUND: Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have impaired vasomotor reactivity, especially in the affected cerebral hemisphere, such that they may depend directly on systemic blood pressure to maintain perfusion to vulnerable 'at risk' penumbral tissue. As the sitting up position may affect cerebral perfusion by decreasing cerebral blood flow (CBF) in salvageable tissue, positioning AIS patients with their head in a lying flat position could increase CBF through collateral circulation or gravitational force. We wished to quantify the effect of different head positions on mean flow velocity (MFV) by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in AIS patients to assess the potential for benefit (or harm) of head positioning in a clinical trial. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with TCD to evaluate differences in cerebral MFV between the lying flat and sitting up head positions in AIS. For each study and each comparison, we obtained the mean value of changes in MFV and its variance. RESULTS: A total of 303 studies were identified, but 298 were excluded for varying reasons; 4 papers met the inclusion criteria and 57 patients were included in the meta-analysis for calculation of the overall mean difference in MFV. We found a significant increase in MFV from a bed angle of 30 to 15° (4.6 cm/s, 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.9-6.2, p < 0.001) and from 30 to 0° (8.3 cm/s, 95% CI 5.3-11.3, p < 0.001) in the affected hemisphere but not on the normal side in AIS patients. CONCLUSIONS: In AIS patients, MFV increased significantly in the side affected by the stroke but not in the unaffected side when they were positioned in a lying flat head position at 0 or 15° compared to an upright head position at 30°. The clinical significance of these findings is now undergoing further randomized evaluation in the international multicenter Head Position in Acute Stroke Trial (HeadPoST).
BACKGROUND:Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) have impaired vasomotor reactivity, especially in the affected cerebral hemisphere, such that they may depend directly on systemic blood pressure to maintain perfusion to vulnerable 'at risk' penumbral tissue. As the sitting up position may affect cerebral perfusion by decreasing cerebral blood flow (CBF) in salvageable tissue, positioning AIS patients with their head in a lying flat position could increase CBF through collateral circulation or gravitational force. We wished to quantify the effect of different head positions on mean flow velocity (MFV) by transcranial Doppler ultrasonography (TCD) in AIS patients to assess the potential for benefit (or harm) of head positioning in a clinical trial. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies with TCD to evaluate differences in cerebral MFV between the lying flat and sitting up head positions in AIS. For each study and each comparison, we obtained the mean value of changes in MFV and its variance. RESULTS: A total of 303 studies were identified, but 298 were excluded for varying reasons; 4 papers met the inclusion criteria and 57 patients were included in the meta-analysis for calculation of the overall mean difference in MFV. We found a significant increase in MFV from a bed angle of 30 to 15° (4.6 cm/s, 95% confidence interval, CI, 2.9-6.2, p < 0.001) and from 30 to 0° (8.3 cm/s, 95% CI 5.3-11.3, p < 0.001) in the affected hemisphere but not on the normal side in AIS patients. CONCLUSIONS: In AIS patients, MFV increased significantly in the side affected by the stroke but not in the unaffected side when they were positioned in a lying flat head position at 0 or 15° compared to an upright head position at 30°. The clinical significance of these findings is now undergoing further randomized evaluation in the international multicenter Head Position in Acute Stroke Trial (HeadPoST).
Authors: Latisha K Ali; Julius K Weng; Sidney Starkman; Jeffrey L Saver; Doojin Kim; Bruce Ovbiagele; Brian H Buck; Nerses Sanossian; Paul Vespa; Oh Young Bang; Reza Jahan; Gary R Duckwiler; Fernando Viñuela; David S Liebeskind Journal: Interv Neurol Date: 2016-09-30
Authors: Sowmya Kumble; Elizabeth K Zink; Mackenzie Burch; Sandra Deluzio; Robert D Stevens; Mona N Bahouth Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2017-08 Impact factor: 3.210
Authors: Lonnie G Petersen; Justin S Lawley; Alexander Lilja-Cyron; Johan C G Petersen; Erin J Howden; Satyam Sarma; William K Cornwell; Rong Zhang; Louis A Whitworth; Michael A Williams; Marianne Juhler; Benjamin D Levine Journal: J Physiol Date: 2018-11-20 Impact factor: 5.182
Authors: Maria M Galardi; Jennifer M Strahle; Alex Skidmore; Akash P Kansagra; Kristin P Guilliams Journal: Pediatr Neurol Date: 2020-01-11 Impact factor: 3.372
Authors: Brian Silver; Tariq Hamid; Muhib Khan; Mario Di Napoli; Reza Behrouz; Gustavo Saposnik; Jo-Ann Sarafin; Susan Martin; Majaz Moonis; Nils Henninger; Richard Goddeau; Adalia Jun-O'Connell; Shawna M Cutting; Ali Saad; Shadi Yaghi; Wiley Hall; Susanne Muehlschlegel; Raphael Carandang; Marcey Osgood; Bradford B Thompson; Corey R Fehnel; Linda C Wendell; N Stevenson Potter; James M Gilchrist; Bruce Barton Journal: J Neurol Sci Date: 2019-12-05 Impact factor: 3.181
Authors: Paula Muñoz Venturelli; Jason P Appleton; Craig S Anderson; Philip M Bath Journal: Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep Date: 2018-09-18 Impact factor: 5.081