Literature DB >> 25892679

Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 h of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early mobilisation after stroke is thought to contribute to the effects of stroke-unit care; however, the intervention is poorly defined and not underpinned by strong evidence. We aimed to compare the effectiveness of frequent, higher dose, very early mobilisation with usual care after stroke.
METHODS: We did this parallel-group, single-blind, randomised controlled trial at 56 acute stroke units in five countries. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with ischaemic or haemorrhagic stroke, first or recurrent, who met physiological criteria were randomly assigned (1:1), via a web-based computer generated block randomisation procedure (block size of six), to receive usual stroke-unit care alone or very early mobilisation in addition to usual care. Treatment with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator was allowed. Randomisation was stratified by study site and stroke severity. Patients, outcome assessors, and investigators involved in trial and data management were masked to treatment allocation. The primary outcome was a favourable outcome 3 months after stroke, defined as a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2. We did analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. The trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, number ACTRN12606000185561.
FINDINGS: Between July 18, 2006, and Oct 16, 2014, we randomly assigned 2104 patients to receive either very early mobilisation (n=1054) or usual care (n=1050); 2083 (99%) patients were included in the 3 month follow-up assessment. 965 (92%) patients were mobilised within 24 h in the very early mobilisation group compared with 623 (59%) patients in the usual care group. Fewer patients in the very early mobilisation group had a favourable outcome than those in the usual care group (n=480 [46%] vs n=525 [50%]; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0·73, 95% CI 0·59-0·90; p=0·004). 88 (8%) patients died in the very early mobilisation group compared with 72 (7%) patients in the usual care group (OR 1·34, 95% CI 0·93-1·93, p=0·113). 201 (19%) patients in the very early mobilisation group and 208 (20%) of those in the usual care group had a non-fatal serious adverse event, with no reduction in immobility-related complications with very early mobilisation.
INTERPRETATION: First mobilisation took place within 24 h for most patients in this trial. The higher dose, very early mobilisation protocol was associated with a reduction in the odds of a favourable outcome at 3 months. Early mobilisation after stroke is recommended in many clinical practice guidelines worldwide, and our findings should affect clinical practice by refining present guidelines; however, clinical recommendations should be informed by future analyses of dose-response associations. FUNDING: National Health and Medical Research Council, Singapore Health, Chest Heart and Stroke Scotland, Northern Ireland Chest Heart and Stroke, UK Stroke Association, National Institute of Health Research.
Copyright © 2015 Bernhardt et al. Open Access article distributed under the terms of CC BY-NC-ND. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25892679     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60690-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  157 in total

1.  Finally, a time and place for electrophysiological testing in critically ill patients?

Authors:  Eddy Fan; Margaret S Herridge
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2015-09-30       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Stroke in 2015: Acute endovascular recanalization therapy comes of age.

Authors:  Alejandro A Rabinstein
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2016-01-08       Impact factor: 42.937

3.  Relationship between first mobilization following the onset of stroke and clinical outcomes in patients with ischemic stroke in the general ward of a hospital: A cohort study.

Authors:  Yu Kitaji; Hiroaki Harashima; Satoshi Miyano
Journal:  Phys Ther Res       Date:  2020-09-02

4.  Longer Time Before Acute Rehabilitation Therapy Worsens Disability After Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Carmen E Capo-Lugo; Robert L Askew; Kathryn Muldoon; Matthew Maas; Eric Liotta; Shyam Prabhakaran; Andrew Naidech
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 3.966

5.  Early mobilisation and rehabilitation in intensive care unit-ready for implementation?

Authors:  Julie Bernhardt
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-02

Review 6.  Diffusion tensor imaging as a prognostic biomarker for motor recovery and rehabilitation after stroke.

Authors:  Josep Puig; Gerard Blasco; Gottfried Schlaug; Cathy M Stinear; Pepus Daunis-I-Estadella; Carles Biarnes; Jaume Figueras; Joaquín Serena; Maria Hernández-Pérez; Angel Alberich-Bayarri; Mar Castellanos; David S Liebeskind; Andrew M Demchuk; Bijoy K Menon; Götz Thomalla; Kambiz Nael; Max Wintermark; Salvador Pedraza
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-03-14       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 7.  The effects of active mobilisation and rehabilitation in ICU on mortality and function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Claire J Tipping; Meg Harrold; Anne Holland; Lorena Romero; Travis Nisbet; Carol L Hodgson
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2016-11-18       Impact factor: 17.440

8.  Impaired cerebral autoregulation and neurovascular coupling in middle cerebral artery stroke: Influence of severity?

Authors:  Angela Sm Salinet; Nathália Cc Silva; Juliana Caldas; Daniel S de Azevedo; Marcelo de-Lima-Oliveira; Ricardo C Nogueira; Adriana B Conforto; Manoel J Texeira; Thompson G Robinson; Ronney B Panerai; Edson Bor-Seng-Shu
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 6.200

9.  Accelerating Stroke Recovery: Body Structures and Functions, Activities, Participation, and Quality of Life Outcomes From a Large Rehabilitation Trial.

Authors:  Rebecca Lewthwaite; Carolee J Winstein; Christianne J Lane; Sarah Blanton; Burl R Wagenheim; Monica A Nelsen; Alexander W Dromerick; Steven L Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-02       Impact factor: 3.919

10.  Early Progressive Mobilization of Patients with External Ventricular Drains: Safety and Feasibility.

Authors:  Rebekah A Yataco; Scott M Arnold; Suzanne M Brown; W David Freeman; C Carmen Cononie; Michael G Heckman; Luke W Partridge; Craig M Stucky; Laurie N Mellon; Jennifer L Birst; Kristien L Daron; Martha H Zapata-Cooper; Danton M Schudlich
Journal:  Neurocrit Care       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 3.210

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.