Literature DB >> 31834472

Adherence to the EAU guideline recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in penile cancer: results of the E-PROPS study group survey.

F A Distler1, S Pahernik2, G Gakis3, G Hutterer4, S Lebentrau5, M Rink6, P Nuhn7, S Brookman-May8, M Burger9, C Gratzke10, I Wolff11, M May12.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To validate the adherence of urologists to chemotherapy recommendations given in the EAU guidelines on PeCa. The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines on penile cancer (PeCa) are predominantly based on retrospective studies with low level of evidence.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 14-item-survey addressing general issues of PeCa treatment was developed and sent to 45 European hospitals. 557 urologists participated in the survey of which 43.5%, 19.3%, and 37.2% were in-training, certified, and in leading positions, respectively. Median response rate among participating departments was 85.7% (IQR 75-94%). Three of 14 questions addressed clinical decisions on neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative chemotherapy. Survey results were analyzed by bootstrap-adjusted multivariate logistic-regression-analysis to identify predictors for chemotherapy recommendations consistent with the guidelines.
RESULTS: Neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and palliative chemotherapy was recommended according to EAU guidelines in 21%, 26%, and 48%, respectively. For neoadjuvant chemotherapy, urologists holding leading positions or performing chemotherapy were more likely to recommend guideline-consistent treatment (OR 1.85 and 1.92 with p(bootstrap) = 0.007 and 0.003, respectively). Supporting resources (i.e., guidelines, textbooks) were used by 23% of survey participants and significantly improved consistency between treatment recommendations and Guideline recommendations in all chemotherapy settings (p(bootstrap) = 0.010-0.001). Department size and university center status were no significant predictors for all three endpoints.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found a very low rate of adherence to the EAU guidelines on systemic treatment for PeCa. Further investigations are needed to clarify whether this missing adherence is a consequence of limited individual knowledge level or of the low grade of guideline recommendations.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Adjuvant chemotherapy; Guideline compliance; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Palliative chemotherapy; Penile squamous cell carcinoma

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31834472     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-03052-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  15 in total

1.  Prognostic Factors of Adjuvant Taxane, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Chemotherapy for Patients With Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma After Regional Lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  Andrea Necchi; Salvatore Lo Vullo; Nicola Nicolai; Daniele Raggi; Patrizia Giannatempo; Maurizio Colecchia; Mario Catanzaro; Tullio Torelli; Luigi Piva; Davide Biasoni; Silvia Stagni; Luigi Mariani; Roberto Salvioni
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2016-03-10       Impact factor: 2.872

Review 2.  Epidemiology of penile cancer.

Authors:  Michelle Christodoulidou; Varun Sahdev; Selda Houssein; Asif Muneer
Journal:  Curr Probl Cancer       Date:  2015-04-01       Impact factor: 3.187

3.  Neoadjuvant paclitaxel, ifosfamide, and cisplatin chemotherapy for metastatic penile cancer: a phase II study.

Authors:  Lance C Pagliaro; Dallas L Williams; Danai Daliani; Michael B Williams; William Osai; Michael Kincaid; Sijin Wen; Peter F Thall; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Rodolphe Thuret; Maxine Sun; Giovanni Lughezzani; Lars Budaus; Daniel Liberman; Firas Abdollah; Monica Morgan; Rupinder Johal; Claudio Jeldres; Mathieu Latour; Shahrokh F Shariat; François Iborra; Jacques Guiter; Jean-Jacques Patard; Paul Perrotte; Pierre I Karakiewicz
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-14       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Prognostic factors influencing survival from regionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the penis after preoperative chemotherapy.

Authors:  Rian J Dickstein; Mark F Munsell; Lance C Pagliaro; Curtis A Pettaway
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2015-06-03       Impact factor: 5.588

6.  Adherence to the EAU guidelines on Penile Cancer Treatment: European, multicentre, retrospective study.

Authors:  Maida Bada; Francesco Berardinelli; Peter Nyiràdy; Judith Varga; Pasquale Ditonno; Michele Battaglia; Paolo Chiodini; Cosimo De Nunzio; Giorgia Tema; Alessandro Veccia; Alessandro Antonelli; Luca Cindolo; Claudio Simeone; Stefano Puliatti; Salvatore Micali; Luigi Schips
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 4.553

7.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced penile carcinoma.

Authors:  Joost A P Leijte; J Martijn Kerst; Evert Bais; Ninja Antonini; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2007-02-14       Impact factor: 20.096

8.  Taxanes in combination with cisplatin and fluorouracil for advanced penile cancer: preliminary results.

Authors:  Giorgio Pizzocaro; Nicola Nicolai; Angelo Milani
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2008-07-14       Impact factor: 20.096

9.  A Combination of Cisplatin and 5-Fluorouracil With a Taxane in Patients Who Underwent Lymph Node Dissection for Nodal Metastases From Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Penis: Treatment Outcome and Survival Analyses in Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Settings.

Authors:  Nicola Nicolai; Laura Maria Sangalli; Andrea Necchi; Patrizia Giannatempo; Anna Maria Paganoni; Maurizio Colecchia; Luigi Piva; Mario Achille Catanzaro; Davide Biasoni; Silvia Stagni; Tullio Torelli; Daniele Raggi; Elena Faré; Giorgio Pizzocaro; Roberto Salvioni
Journal:  Clin Genitourin Cancer       Date:  2015-08-06       Impact factor: 2.872

10.  Adherence to EAU guidelines on penile cancer translates into better outcomes: a multicenter international study.

Authors:  Luca Cindolo; Philippe E Spiess; Maida Bada; Juan J Chipollini; Peter Nyirády; Paolo Chiodini; Judith Varga; Pasquale Ditonno; Michele Battaglia; Cosimo De Nunzio; Giorgia Tema; Alessandro Veccia; Alessandro Antonelli; Gennaro Musi; Ottavio De Cobelli; Andrea Conti; Salvatore Micali; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; José Quesada Olarte; Erico Diogenes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima; Andrew Tracey; Georgi Guruli; Riccardo Autorino; Petros Sountoulides; Luigi Schips
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 4.226

View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  Immune-based therapies in penile cancer.

Authors:  Vidhu B Joshi; Philippe E Spiess; Andrea Necchi; Curtis A Pettaway; Jad Chahoud
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2022-07-18       Impact factor: 16.430

2.  Why is the principle of "as much radicality as needed, as much organ preservation as possible" only insufficiently implemented in daily practice in the surgical treatment of penile cancer patients?

Authors:  Matthias May; Michael Rink; Axel S Merseburger; Sabine D Brookman-May
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-10

Review 3.  [Quality of care criteria in the treatment of penile cancer].

Authors:  A Thomas; F Kölling; A Haferkamp; I Tsaur
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 0.639

4.  Adherence to the EAU Guideline Recommendations for Local Tumor Treatment in Penile Cancer: Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study Group Survey (E-PROPS).

Authors:  Maximilian Pallauf; Marie C Hempel; Marie C Hupe; Matthias May; Marlene Haccius; Dorothea Weckermann; Steffen Lebentrau; Bernd Hoschke; Ulrike Necknig; Jesco Pfitzenmaier; Lukas Manka; Philipp Nuhn; Peter Törzsök; Lukas Lusuardi; Axel S Merseburger
Journal:  Adv Ther       Date:  2020-10-10       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Does the Identification of a Minimum Number of Cases Correlate With Better Adherence to International Guidelines Regarding the Treatment of Penile Cancer? Survey Results of the European PROspective Penile Cancer Study (E-PROPS).

Authors:  Steffen Lebentrau; Gamal Anton Wakileh; Martin Schostak; Hans-Peter Schmid; Rodrigo Suarez-Ibarrola; Axel S Merseburger; Georg C Hutterer; Ulrike H Necknig; Michael Rink; Martin Bögemann; Luis Alex Kluth; Armin Pycha; Maximilian Burger; Sabine D Brookman-May; Johannes Bründl; Matthias May
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-11-29       Impact factor: 6.244

Review 6.  Systemic treatment of penile squamous cell carcinoma-hurdles and hopes of preclinical models and clinical regimens: a narrative review.

Authors:  Silvia Regina Rogatto; Igor Tsaur; Anita Thomas; Luisa Matos do Canto Alvim; Claudia Aparecida Rainho; Eva Juengel; Roman Alexander Blaheta; Philippe E Spiess
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-10
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.