Literature DB >> 20839061

A contemporary population-based assessment of the rate of lymph node dissection for penile carcinoma.

Rodolphe Thuret1, Maxine Sun, Giovanni Lughezzani, Lars Budaus, Daniel Liberman, Firas Abdollah, Monica Morgan, Rupinder Johal, Claudio Jeldres, Mathieu Latour, Shahrokh F Shariat, François Iborra, Jacques Guiter, Jean-Jacques Patard, Paul Perrotte, Pierre I Karakiewicz.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The adherence rate to National Cancer Institute (NCI) recommendations regarding inguinal lymph nodes dissection (ILND) in high grade T1 (G3T1) and T2-4 squamous cell carcinoma of the penis (SCCP) is not known. We assessed ILND rates in a North American cohort.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The 17 registries of the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database included 868 patients with SCCP, diagnosed between 1988 and 2006. Analyses consisted of univariable and multivariable logistic regression models.
RESULTS: Overall, 27.6% of patients underwent an ILND. ILND rates were directly proportional with T stage: 19.0%, 30.5%, 30.6%, and 32.6% for, respectively, G3T1, T2, T3, and T4 SCCP (chi-square trend, P = 0.01). ILND rates also increased over time and were 19.3, 27.3, 30.7, and 30.8% for respectively, 1988-1995, 1996-2000, 2001-2003, and 2004-2006 periods (chi-square trend, P = 0.03). Finally, ILND rates decreased with patient age and were 42.6, 33.2, 24.7, and 7.3% for, respectively, patients aged ≤ 57, 58-68, 69-78 and ≥ 79 years of age (chi-square trend, P < 0.001). All 3 variables (T-stage, year of primary tumor excision and patient age) achieved independent predictor status in multivariable analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: The overall rate of ILND is low. Nonetheless, there is an upward trend over time. Our data indicate that the adherence to the NCI ILND guidelines is suboptimal. In consequence, ILNDs should be more strongly encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20839061     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-010-1315-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  11 in total

Review 1.  Advanced penile cancer.

Authors:  Jonathan E Heinlen; David D Buethe; Daniel Joseph Culkin
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2011-08-04       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Sentinel node biopsy and lymphatic mapping in penile and prostate cancer.

Authors:  H G van der Poel; P Meershoek; N Grivas; G KleinJan; F W B van Leeuwen; S Horenblas
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Radical penectomy, a compromise for life: results from the PECAD study.

Authors:  Jamil Ghahhari; Michele Marchioni; Philippe E Spiess; Juan J Chipollini; Peter Nyirády; Judith Varga; Pasquale Ditonno; Stefano Boccasile; Giulia Primiceri; Cosimo De Nunzio; Giorgia Tema; Andrea Tubaro; Alessandro Veccia; Alessandro Antonelli; Gennaro Musi; Ottavio De Cobelli; Andrea Conti; Stefano Puliatti; Salvatore Micali; Mario Álvarez-Maestro; José Quesada Olarte; Erico Diogenes; Marcos Venicio Alves Lima; Andrew Tracey; Georgi Guruli; Riccardo Autorino; Petros Sountoulides; Roman Sosnowski; Luigi Schips; Luca Cindolo
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2020-06

4.  Validation of the prognostic value of lymph node ratio in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: a population-based study.

Authors:  Yao Zhu; Cheng-Yuan Gu; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2013-07-23       Impact factor: 2.370

5.  Penile cancer: Perspective from a Canadian tertiary care centre.

Authors:  Benjamin Beech; Jonathan Izawa; Stephen Pautler; Joseph Chin; Nicholas Power
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2015 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 1.862

6.  Adherence to the EAU guideline recommendations for systemic chemotherapy in penile cancer: results of the E-PROPS study group survey.

Authors:  F A Distler; S Pahernik; G Gakis; G Hutterer; S Lebentrau; M Rink; P Nuhn; S Brookman-May; M Burger; C Gratzke; I Wolff; M May
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2019-12-13       Impact factor: 4.226

7.  Underutilization of Surgical Standard of Care for Insured Men with Invasive Penile Cancer.

Authors:  Edward K Chang; Rishi R Sekar; Sarah K Holt; John L Gore; Jonathan L Wright; Yaw A Nyame
Journal:  Urol Pract       Date:  2021-05-01

Review 8.  Robotic inguinal lymphadenectomy for penile cancer: the why, how, and what.

Authors:  Sammy E Elsamra; Michael A Poch
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

Review 9.  Surveillance strategies in the management of penile cancer.

Authors:  Simpa S Salami; Jeffrey S Montgomery
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2017-10

10.  Premature Termination Codons Are Recognized in the Nucleus in A Reading-Frame Dependent Manner.

Authors:  Min Shi; Heng Zhang; Lantian Wang; Changlan Zhu; Ke Sheng; Yanhua Du; Ke Wang; Anusha Dias; She Chen; Malcolm Whitman; Enduo Wang; Robin Reed; Hong Cheng
Journal:  Cell Discov       Date:  2015-05-05       Impact factor: 10.849

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.