Adam J Sterczala1, Jonathan D Miller2, Hannah L Dimmick2, Mandy E Wray2, Michael A Trevino3, Trent J Herda4. 1. Neuromuscular Research Laboratory, Department of Sports Medicine and Nutrition, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, 15203, USA. 2. Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, 1301 Sunnyside Ave., Room 101BE, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. 3. Applied Neuromuscular Physiology Laboratory, School of Kinesiology, Applied Health and Recreation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, 74078, USA. 4. Neuromechanics Laboratory, Department of Health, Sport and Exercise Sciences, University of Kansas, 1301 Sunnyside Ave., Room 101BE, Lawrence, KS, 66045, USA. t.herda@KU.edu.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Previous investigations analyzing resistance training's influence on motor unit (MU) firing rates have yielded mixed results. These mixed results may be clarified by concurrently measuring changes in MU size. Thus, this study analyzed whether post-training strength gains were due to increases in MU firing rates and/or sizes as measured indirectly via action potential amplitudes. METHODS: Sixteen males (age = 20.7 ± 1.9 years) completed 8 weeks of resistance training, while eight males (age = 19.4 ± 2.5 years) served as controls. Vastus lateralis surface electromyography signals collected during submaximal isometric knee extensions were decomposed to yield an action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP), mean firing rate (MFR), and recruitment threshold (RT) for each MU. Each contraction's average MFR and MUAPAMP, and coefficients of the linear (y-intercept and slope) MUAPAMP-RT, linear MFR-RT and exponential (A and B terms) MFR-MUAPAMP relationships were analyzed. Firing instances and action potentials were validated via reconstruct-and-test and spike-triggered averaging procedures. Vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was analyzed with ultrasonography. RESULTS: Resistance training increased isometric strength from 204.6 ± 34.9 to 239.8 ± 36.3 Nm and vastus lateralis CSA from 28.7 ± 4.7 to 34.0 ± 5.0 cm2. Resistance training did not affect MFR-RT relationship parameters or average MFRs but did increase the slopes of the MUAPAMP-RT relationships (0.0067 ± 0.0041 to 0.0097 ± 0.0045 mV/%MVC) and average MUAPAMPs from 0.189 ± 0.093 to 0.249 ± 0.127 mV. MU hypertrophy altered the MFR-MUAPAMP relationships (B terms: - 3.63 ± 1.40 to - 2.66 ± 1.38 pps/mV). CONCLUSION: Resistance training induced MU and muscle hypertrophy, but did not alter firing rates. Greater MU twitch forces resulting from larger MUs firing at pre-training rates likely explain resistance training strength gains.
PURPOSE: Previous investigations analyzing resistance training's influence on motor unit (MU) firing rates have yielded mixed results. These mixed results may be clarified by concurrently measuring changes in MU size. Thus, this study analyzed whether post-training strength gains were due to increases in MU firing rates and/or sizes as measured indirectly via action potential amplitudes. METHODS: Sixteen males (age = 20.7 ± 1.9 years) completed 8 weeks of resistance training, while eight males (age = 19.4 ± 2.5 years) served as controls. Vastus lateralis surface electromyography signals collected during submaximal isometric knee extensions were decomposed to yield an action potential amplitude (MUAPAMP), mean firing rate (MFR), and recruitment threshold (RT) for each MU. Each contraction's average MFR and MUAPAMP, and coefficients of the linear (y-intercept and slope) MUAPAMP-RT, linear MFR-RT and exponential (A and B terms) MFR-MUAPAMP relationships were analyzed. Firing instances and action potentials were validated via reconstruct-and-test and spike-triggered averaging procedures. Vastus lateralis cross-sectional area (CSA) was analyzed with ultrasonography. RESULTS: Resistance training increased isometric strength from 204.6 ± 34.9 to 239.8 ± 36.3 Nm and vastus lateralis CSA from 28.7 ± 4.7 to 34.0 ± 5.0 cm2. Resistance training did not affect MFR-RT relationship parameters or average MFRs but did increase the slopes of the MUAPAMP-RT relationships (0.0067 ± 0.0041 to 0.0097 ± 0.0045 mV/%MVC) and average MUAPAMPs from 0.189 ± 0.093 to 0.249 ± 0.127 mV. MU hypertrophy altered the MFR-MUAPAMP relationships (B terms: - 3.63 ± 1.40 to - 2.66 ± 1.38 pps/mV). CONCLUSION: Resistance training induced MU and muscle hypertrophy, but did not alter firing rates. Greater MU twitch forces resulting from larger MUs firing at pre-training rates likely explain resistance training strength gains.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electromyography; Exercise; Hypertrophy; Motor control; Rate coding
Authors: Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Antonio J Morales-Artacho; Alexandra McKeown; Clare L Appleby; Jonathan P Folland Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2017-02-26 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Jonathan D Miller; Adam J Sterczala; Michael A Trevino; Mandy E Wray; Hannah L Dimmick; Trent J Herda Journal: Eur J Appl Physiol Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 3.078
Authors: Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda; Andrew C Fry; Philip M Gallagher; John P Vardiman; Eric M Mosier; Jonathan D Miller Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Nathaniel D M Jenkins; Amelia A Miramonti; Ethan C Hill; Cory M Smith; Kristen C Cochrane-Snyman; Terry J Housh; Joel T Cramer Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 4.566
Authors: Ajeng Hayu Nayasista; Damayanti Tinduh; I Putu Alit Pawana; Sri Mardjiati Mei Wulan; Dwikora Novembri Utomo; Melaniani Soenarnatalina Journal: Ann Med Surg (Lond) Date: 2022-05-21
Authors: Alex A Olmos; Trent J Herda; Stephanie A Sontag; Michael A Trevino Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2022-06-01 Impact factor: 1.864
Authors: Rob J MacLennan; David Ogilvie; John McDorman; Ernest Vargas; Arielle R Grusky; Youngdeok Kim; Jeanette M Garcia; Matt S Stock Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2021-01
Authors: Hannah L Dimmick; Michael A Trevino; Jonathan D Miller; Mandy E Parra; Adam J Sterczala; Trent J Herda Journal: J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact Date: 2022-03-01 Impact factor: 1.864