Literature DB >> 26936975

Action potential amplitude as a noninvasive indicator of motor unit-specific hypertrophy.

Zachary K Pope1, Garrett M Hester1, Franklin M Benik1, Jason M DeFreitas2.   

Abstract

Skeletal muscle fibers hypertrophy in response to strength training, with type II fibers generally demonstrating the greatest plasticity in regards to cross-sectional area (CSA). However, assessing fiber type-specific CSA in humans requires invasive muscle biopsies. With advancements in the decomposition of surface electromyographic (sEMG) signals recorded using multichannel electrode arrays, the firing properties of individual motor units (MUs) can now be detected noninvasively. Since action potential amplitude (APSIZE) has a documented relationship with muscle fiber size, as well as with its parent MU's recruitment threshold (RT) force, our purpose was to examine if MU APSIZE, as a function of its RT (i.e., the size principle), could potentially be used as a longitudinal indicator of MU-specific hypertrophy. By decomposing the sEMG signals from the vastus lateralis muscle of 10 subjects during maximal voluntary knee extensions, we noninvasively assessed the relationship between MU APSIZE and RT before and immediately after an 8-wk strength training intervention. In addition to significant increases in muscle size and strength (P < 0.02), our data show that training elicited an increase in MU APSIZE of high-threshold MUs. Additionally, a large portion of the variance (83.6%) in the change in each individual's relationship between MU APSIZE and RT was explained by training-induced changes in whole muscle CSA (obtained via ultrasonography). Our findings suggest that the noninvasive, electrophysiological assessment of longitudinal changes to MU APSIZE appears to reflect hypertrophy specific to MUs across the RT continuum.
Copyright © 2016 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  size principle; skeletal muscle fiber type; strength training; surface EMG decomposition

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26936975      PMCID: PMC4922476          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00039.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

Review 1.  Human skeletal muscle fiber type classifications.

Authors:  W Scott; J Stevens; S A Binder-Macleod
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2001-11

2.  Conduction velocity and amplitude of the action potential as related to circumference in the isolated fibre of frog muscle.

Authors:  C H HAKANSSON
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1956-07-17

3.  Cross-innervated mammalian skeletal muscle: histochemical, physiological and biochemical observations.

Authors:  V Dubowitz
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Influence of eccentric actions on skeletal muscle adaptations to resistance training.

Authors:  B M Hather; P A Tesch; P Buchanan; G A Dudley
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1991-10

Review 5.  Common drive of motor units in regulation of muscle force.

Authors:  C J De Luca; Z Erim
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 13.837

6.  Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle.

Authors:  A Thorstensson; J Karlsson; J H Viitasalo; P Luhtanen; P V Komi
Journal:  Acta Physiol Scand       Date:  1976-10

7.  Recruitment of motor units in voluntary contraction of a finger muscle in man.

Authors:  J Tanji; M Kato
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 5.330

8.  Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model.

Authors:  M E Houston; E A Froese; S P Valeriote; H J Green; D A Ranney
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1983

9.  A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture.

Authors:  P Aagaard; J L Andersen; P Dyhre-Poulsen; A M Leffers; A Wagner; S P Magnusson; J Halkjaer-Kristensen; E B Simonsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Changes in single motor unit behaviour contribute to the increase in contraction speed after dynamic training in humans.

Authors:  M Van Cutsem; J Duchateau; K Hainaut
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1998-11-15       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  15 in total

1.  Motor unit action potential amplitude during low torque fatiguing contractions versus high torque non-fatiguing contractions: a multilevel analysis.

Authors:  Kylie K Harmon; Adam S Hamilton; Brent D Johnson; Frank J Bartek; Ryan M Girts; Rob J MacLennan; Debbie L Hahs-Vaughn; Matt S Stock
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-01-23       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  The effect of rate of torque development on motor unit recruitment and firing rates during isometric voluntary trapezoidal contractions.

Authors:  Jonathan D Miller; C J Lund; Marissa D Gingrich; Kyle L Schtul; Mandy E Wray; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Vastus lateralis muscle tissue composition and motor unit properties in chronically endurance-trained vs. sedentary women.

Authors:  Hannah L Dimmick; Jonathan D Miller; Adam J Sterczala; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-06-11       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Electromyographic amplitude versus torque relationships are different in young versus postmenopausal females and are related to muscle mass after controlling for bodyweight.

Authors:  Nile F Banks; Emily M Rogers; Nathaniel D M Jenkins
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Characteristics of motor unit recruitment in boys and men at maximal and submaximal force levels.

Authors:  Emeric Chalchat; Enzo Piponnier; Bastien Bontemps; Valérie Julian; Olivia Bocock; Martine Duclos; Sébastien Ratel; Vincent Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-03-11       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Eight weeks of resistance training increases strength, muscle cross-sectional area and motor unit size, but does not alter firing rates in the vastus lateralis.

Authors:  Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Hannah L Dimmick; Mandy E Wray; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 7.  Resistance exercise training and the motor unit.

Authors:  Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-06-25       Impact factor: 3.346

8.  The influence of chronic training status on the mechanical behavior of the vastus lateralis during repetitive trapezoidal contractions.

Authors:  Alex A Olmos; Trent J Herda; Stephanie A Sontag; Michael A Trevino
Journal:  J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact       Date:  2022-06-01       Impact factor: 1.864

9.  Influence of the contractile properties of muscle on motor unit firing rates during a moderate-intensity contraction in vivo.

Authors:  Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda; Andrew C Fry; Philip M Gallagher; John P Vardiman; Eric M Mosier; Jonathan D Miller
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  The reliability of the slopes and y-intercepts of the motor unit firing times and action potential waveforms versus recruitment threshold relationships derived from surface electromyography signal decomposition.

Authors:  Mandy E Parra; Jonathan D Miller; Adam J Sterczala; Melani R Kelly; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-09-03       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.