Literature DB >> 28239775

Changes in agonist neural drive, hypertrophy and pre-training strength all contribute to the individual strength gains after resistance training.

Thomas G Balshaw1,2, Garry J Massey3,4, Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson4,5, Antonio J Morales-Artacho4, Alexandra McKeown4, Clare L Appleby4, Jonathan P Folland3,4.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Whilst neural and morphological adaptations following resistance training (RT) have been investigated extensively at a group level, relatively little is known about the contribution of specific physiological mechanisms, or pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength following training. This study investigated the contribution of multiple underpinning neural [agonist EMG (QEMGMVT), antagonist EMG (HEMGANTAG)] and morphological variables [total quadriceps volume (QUADSVOL), and muscle fascicle pennation angle (QUADSθ p)], as well as pre-training strength, to the individual changes in strength after 12 weeks of knee extensor RT.
METHODS: Twenty-eight healthy young men completed 12 weeks of isometric knee extensor RT (3/week). Isometric maximum voluntary torque (MVT) was assessed pre- and post-RT, as were simultaneous neural drive to the agonist (QEMGMVT) and antagonist (HEMGANTAG). In addition QUADSVOL was determined with MRI and QUADSθ p with B-mode ultrasound.
RESULTS: Percentage changes (∆) in MVT were correlated to ∆QEMGMVT (r = 0.576, P = 0.001), ∆QUADSVOL (r = 0.461, P = 0.014), and pre-training MVT (r = -0.429, P = 0.023), but not ∆HEMGANTAG (r = 0.298, P = 0.123) or ∆QUADSθ p (r = -0.207, P = 0.291). Multiple regression analysis revealed 59.9% of the total variance in ∆MVT after RT to be explained by ∆QEMGMVT (30.6%), ∆QUADSVOL (18.7%), and pre-training MVT (10.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Changes in agonist neural drive, quadriceps muscle volume and pre-training strength combined to explain the majority of the variance in strength changes after knee extensor RT (~60%) and adaptations in agonist neural drive were the most important single predictor during this short-term intervention.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Between-individual variability; Muscle architecture; Muscle volume; Neural drive; Strength training

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28239775     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-017-3560-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  56 in total

1.  Strong correlation of maximal squat strength with sprint performance and vertical jump height in elite soccer players.

Authors:  U Wisløff; C Castagna; J Helgerud; R Jones; J Hoff
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Twitch interpolation of the elbow flexor muscles at high forces.

Authors:  G M Allen; D K McKenzie; S C Gandevia
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 3.217

3.  Knee extensor strength, activation, and size in very elderly people following strength training.

Authors:  S D Harridge; A Kryger; A Stensgaard
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 3.217

4.  Effect of isometric strength training of mechanical, electrical, and metabolic aspects of muscle function.

Authors:  P V Komi; J T Viitasalo; R Rauramaa; V Vihko
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1978-12-15

5.  A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture.

Authors:  P Aagaard; J L Andersen; P Dyhre-Poulsen; A M Leffers; A Wagner; S P Magnusson; J Halkjaer-Kristensen; E B Simonsen
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2001-07-15       Impact factor: 5.182

6.  Inter-individual variability in the adaptation of human muscle specific tension to progressive resistance training.

Authors:  Robert M Erskine; David A Jones; Alun G Williams; Claire E Stewart; Hans Degens
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Comparative effectiveness of accommodating and weight resistance training modes.

Authors:  F T O'Hagan; D G Sale; J D MacDougall; S H Garner
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Muscle quality. II. Effects Of strength training in 65- to 75-yr-old men and women.

Authors:  B L Tracy; F M Ivey; D Hurlbut; G F Martel; J T Lemmer; E L Siegel; E J Metter; J L Fozard; J L Fleg; B F Hurley
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-01

9.  Muscle hypertrophy in men and women.

Authors:  K J Cureton; M A Collins; D W Hill; F M McElhannon
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Anterior cruciate ligament injury prevention training in female athletes: a systematic review of injury reduction and results of athletic performance tests.

Authors:  Frank R Noyes; Sue D Barber Westin
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.843

View more
  18 in total

1.  Muscle size and strength: debunking the "completely separate phenomena" suggestion.

Authors:  Thomas G Balshaw; Garry J Massey; Thomas M Maden-Wilkinson; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Muscle size and strength: another study not designed to answer the question.

Authors:  Samuel L Buckner; Scott J Dankel; Kevin T Mattocks; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-04-22       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Correlations Do Not Show Cause and Effect: Not Even for Changes in Muscle Size and Strength.

Authors:  Scott J Dankel; Samuel L Buckner; Matthew B Jessee; J Grant Mouser; Kevin T Mattocks; Takashi Abe; Jeremy P Loenneke
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  The Importance of Muscular Strength: Training Considerations.

Authors:  Timothy J Suchomel; Sophia Nimphius; Christopher R Bellon; Michael H Stone
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Eight weeks of resistance training increases strength, muscle cross-sectional area and motor unit size, but does not alter firing rates in the vastus lateralis.

Authors:  Adam J Sterczala; Jonathan D Miller; Hannah L Dimmick; Mandy E Wray; Michael A Trevino; Trent J Herda
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-12-12       Impact factor: 3.078

6.  Causal Mediation Analysis Could Resolve Whether Training-Induced Increases in Muscle Strength are Mediated by Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  James L Nuzzo; Harrison T Finn; Robert D Herbert
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 7.  Efficacy of resistance training during adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in cancer care: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Aoife McGovern; Nicholas Mahony; David Mockler; Neil Fleming
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2022-01-07       Impact factor: 3.603

8.  Relationship between hypertrophy, strength gains and tensiomyography adaptations: a moderator role of contraction duration.

Authors:  Filip Kojić; Radenko Arsenijević; Vladimir Ilić; Saša Đurić
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2022-07-13       Impact factor: 3.346

9.  Physiological adaptations to resistance training in rats selectively bred for low and high response to aerobic exercise training.

Authors:  Juha P Ahtiainen; Sanna Lensu; Ilona Ruotsalainen; Moritz Schumann; Johanna K Ihalainen; Vasco Fachada; Christopher L Mendias; Matthew S Brook; Kenneth Smith; Philip J Atherton; Lauren G Koch; Steven L Britton; Heikki Kainulainen
Journal:  Exp Physiol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 2.969

10.  Heterogeneity of the strength response to progressive resistance exercise training in older adults: Contributions of muscle contractility.

Authors:  Leatha A Clark; David W Russ; Dallin Tavoian; W David Arnold; Timothy D Law; Christopher R France; Brian C Clark
Journal:  Exp Gerontol       Date:  2021-06-04       Impact factor: 4.253

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.