| Literature DB >> 31830086 |
Marloes van Splunter1, Olaf Perdijk1, Henriëtte Fick-Brinkhof2, Esther G Floris-Vollenbroek3, Ben Meijer1, Sylvia Brugman1, Huub F J Savelkoul1, Els van Hoffen3, R J Joost van Neerven1,4.
Abstract
Ageing is associated with a changing immune system, leading to inflammageing (increased levels of inflammation markers in serum) and immunosenescence (reduced immune cells and reduced responses towards pathogens). This results in reduced vaccination responses and increased infections in elderly. Much is known about the adaptive immune system upon ageing, but less is known about the innate immune system. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare innate immune function of Toll like receptor (TLR)-mediated responses between elderly and young adult women. To this end, elderly and young adult women were compared to study the effect of ageing on the relative prevalence and reactivity to TLR-mediated responses of myeloid- and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (mDC, pDC). In addition, TLR expression and inflammatory markers in serum were investigated. Elderly women had reduced numbers of circulating pDCs. In addition, pDCs and mDCs of elderly women responded differently towards TLR stimulation, especially TLR7/8 mediated stimulation was reduced, compared to young adults. In serum, markers involved in inflammation were generally increased in elderly. In conclusion, this study confirms and extends the knowledge about immunosenescence and inflammageing on innate immunity in elderly women.Entities:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31830086 PMCID: PMC6907850 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225825
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Demographics of elderly and young adult study population.
| Group | Age in years median (range) | Anti-inflammatory medicine | Vitamine D supplementation before study (Y/N) | Blood pressure or cholesterol medication (Y/N) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Elderly women n = 30 | 74.5 (69–85) | 1/29 | 13/17 | 12/18 |
| Young women | 24 (20–29) | 1/14 | 2/13 | 0/15 |
Antibodies used for TLR expression and intracellular cytokine measurements.
| Fluorchrome | host | isotype | Light chain | company | Catalog number | Panel | Extra/ Intra-cellular | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FITC | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD | 643397 | TLR & cytokine | extra | |
| APC-Cy7 | mouse | IgG2b | κ | Ebioscience | 47-9956-42 | TLR & cytokine | Extra | |
| PE-Cy5 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 15-1239-42 | TLR & cytokine | Extra | |
| PE-Cy7 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 25-0116-42 | TLR & cytokine | Extra | |
| biotin | mouse | IgG2a | κ | Ebioscience | 13992282 | TLR | Extra | |
| biotin | mouse | IgG2a | κ | Ebioscience | 13472785 | TLR | Extra | |
| BV510 | BD | 563261 | TLR | Extra | ||||
| BV421 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD | 564401 | TLR | Extra | |
| BV421 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD | 562438 | TLR | extra | |
| efluor520 | Ebioscience | 65-0867-18 | TLR & cytokine | Extra | ||||
| PE | mouse | IgG2a | R&D Systems | IC5875P | TLR | Intra | ||
| PE | mouse | IgG2a | R&D Systems | IC003P | TLR | Intra | ||
| APC | rat | IgG2a | κ | Ebioscience | 17909982 | TLR | Intra | |
| APC | rat | IgG2a | κ | Ebioscience | 17-4321-81 | TLR | Intra | |
| BV510 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD | 740203 | Cytokine | Extra | |
| pe | rat | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 12706982 | Cytokine | Intra | |
| PE | rat | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 12430183 | cytokine | Intra | |
| V450 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD | 561382 | Cytokine | intra | |
| V450 | mouse | IgG1 | κ | BD Horizon | 561504 | cytokine | intra | |
| apc | mouse | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 17734982 | Cytokine | Intra | |
| APC | mouse | IgG1 | κ | Ebioscience | 17-4714-41 | Cytokine | Intra |
Antibody mixes were made for extra-cellular or intra-cellular staining. Ic = isotype control
Fig 1Gating strategy of intracellular cytokine production by a donor from the elderly population (171/002) (A) or a donor from the young adult population (171/young/003) (B) in steady state (RPMI).
Fig 2Percentage of pDCs and mDCs and ratio %mDC/%pDCs in elderly and young adults (A) and percentage of mDCs (B) and pDCs (C) positive for intracellular cytokine production of IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-α in steady state (RPMI). Data shown as dotplot with median, outliers with >2SD based on transformed data were removed. Elderly n = 30; young n = 15 donors. Statistics were done with logit transformed data using MANOVA with a pairwise comparison and a bonferroni correction. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.001.
Fig 3Intracellular cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-α) of pDCs upon TLR1/2 (A), TLR4 (B), TLR 7/8 (C) and TLR9 (D) stimulation in young versus older adults. Data shown as dot plots with median, every dot represents a donor, outliers with >2SD based on transformed data were removed. Elderly n = 30; young n = 15 donors. Statistics were done with logit or rank transformed data using MANOVA per TLR stimulation with a pairwise comparison and a bonferroni correction. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.001.
Fig 4Intracellular cytokine production (IL-6, TNF-α and IFN-α) of mDCs upon TLR 1/2 (A), TLR 4 (B), TLR 7/8 (C) and TLR 9 (D) stimulation in young versus older adults. Data shown as dot plots with median, every dot represents a donor, outliers with >2SD based on transformed data were removed. Elderly n = 30; young n = 15 donors. Statistics were done with logit or rank transformed data using MANOVA per TLR stimulation with a pairwise comparison and a bonferroni correction. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; *** p<0.001.
Concentration of pro-inflammatory markers in serum in median pg/ml with range (minimum to maximum value) in elderly (n = 30) and young adults (n = 15) women.
| Elderly (pg/ml) | Young adults (pg/ml) | Statistically different | |
|---|---|---|---|
| IL-6 | 3.77 | 2.31 | NS |
| IL-1β | 0.22 | 0.02 | NS |
| IL-10 | 2.93 | 1.47 | |
| TNF-α | 13.57 | 0.00 | |
| sICAM ng/ml | 84.38 | 15.10 | |
| sVCAM ng/ml | 258.48 | 153.13 | |
| IL-1Ra | 58.93 | 87.40 | P = 0.06 |
| CRP (ng/ml) | 538 | 662 | NS |
Statistical analysis was performed using 10 log or rank transformed data by MANOVA with pairwise comparisons using bonferroni correction.
* p<0.05
** p<0.01
*** p<0.001.
ND not determined, statistical analyses not performed as too many values were 0 pg/ml. NS no significant differences.