| Literature DB >> 31827404 |
Jing Wang1,2, Mingjun Zheng1,2, Liancheng Zhu1,2, Lu Deng1,2,3, Xiao Li1,2, Linging Gao1,2, Caixia Wang1,2, Huimin Wang1,2,4, Juanjuan Liu1,2, Bei Lin1,2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Abnormal activation of the classic Wnt signaling pathway is closely related to the occurrence of epithelial cancers. B-cell lymphoma 9 (BCL9), a transcription factor, is a novel oncogene discovered in the classic Wnt pathway and promotes the occurrence and development of various tumors. Ovarian cancer is the gynecological malignant tumor with the highest mortality because it is difficult to diagnose early, and easy to relapse and metastasis. The expression and role of BCL9 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have not been studied. Thus, in this research, we aimed to investigate the expression and clinical significance of BCL9 in EOC tissues and its effect on the malignant biological behavior of human ovarian cancer cells.Entities:
Keywords: BCL9; Malignant biological behavior; Ovarian cancer; Targeted therapy
Year: 2019 PMID: 31827404 PMCID: PMC6896700 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-019-1009-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cancer Cell Int ISSN: 1475-2867 Impact factor: 5.722
Expression of BCL9 antigen in different ovarian tissues
| Group | n | BCL9 | Positive cases | Positive rate % | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (−) | (+) | (++) | (+++) | ||||
| Malignant# | 61 | 11 | 21 | 13 | 16 | 51 | 81.97 |
| Borderline** | 13 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 76.92 |
| Benign* | 13 | 8 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 38.46 |
| Normal | 12 | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
*P < 0.05, compared with normal group
**P < 0.01, compared with normal group
#P < 0.01, compared with benign group and normal group
Fig. 1Expression of BCL9 in different ovarian tissues (upper panels: ×200 magnification; lower panels: ×400 magnification)
Relationship between the expression of BCL9 and clinicopathological parameters of epithelial ovarian cancer
| Feature | n | Negative | Positive | Low | High | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 61 | 1.000 | 0.412 | ||||
| < 50 | 11 | 2 | 9 | 7 | 4 | ||
| ≥ 50 | 50 | 9 | 41 | 25 | 25 | ||
| Pathological type | 61 | 0.778 | 0.134 | ||||
| Serous | 49 | 8 | 41 | 24 | 6 | ||
| Other | 26 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 9 | ||
| FIGO stage | 61 | 0.139 | 0.210 | ||||
| I–II | 24 | 7 | 17 | 13 | 11 | ||
| III–IV | 37 | 4 | 33 | 14 | 23 | ||
| Differentiation | 61 | 0.288 | 0.080 | ||||
| Well/moderate | 22 | 6 | 16 | 13 | 9 | ||
| Poor | 39 | 5 | 34 | 14 | 25 | ||
| Lymphatic | 48 | 0.334 | 0.424 | ||||
| No | 35 | 9 | 26 | 18 | 17 | ||
| Yes | 13 | 1 | 12 | 5 | 8 |
Fig. 2Kaplan–Meier curves of progression-free survival and overall survival in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer. a, b Correlation between BCL9 expression and progression-free survival and overall survival. c, d Correlation between clinical stage and progression-free survival and overall survival. e, f Correlation between lymph node metastasis and progression-free survival and overall survival. All P < 0.05
Cox regression analysis of progression-free survival in epithelial ovarian cancer patients
| Variable | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | Hazard ratio 95% confidence interval | HR | Hazard ratio 95% confidence interval | |||
| Age (< 50 years vs. ≥ 50 years) | 1.115 | 0.452–2.749 | 0.814 | 0.59 | 0.185–1.880 | 0.372 |
| FIGO stage (I–II vs. III–IV) | 5.684 | 1.964–16.456 | 0.001** | 6.655 | 1.769–25.040 | 0.005** |
| BCL9 expression (low vs. high) | 3.382 | 1.432–7.988 | 0.005** | 3.721 | 1.230–11.253 | 0.020* |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) | 2.628 | 1.082–6.387 | 0.033* | 1.186 | 0.424–3.316 | 0.746 |
**P < 0.01. *P < 0.05
Cox’s regression analysis of OS of ovarian epithelial cancer
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95% CI of HR | P-value | HR | 95% CI of HR | P-value | |
| Age (< 50 vs. ≥ 50) | 0.944 | 0.381–2.34 | 0.902 | 0.384 | 0.119–1.244 | 0.111 |
| FIGO stage (I–II vs. III–IV) | 5.188 | 1.788–15.058 | 0.002** | 6.655 | 1.628–27.205 | 0.008** |
| BCL9 expression (low vs. high) | 4.126 | 1.657–10.273 | 0.002** | 4.741 | 1.450–15.495 | 0.010* |
| Lymph node metastasis (yes vs. no) | 2.961 | 1.198–7.32 | 0.019* | 1.419 | 0.504–3.994 | 0.508 |
**P < 0.01. *P < 0.05
Fig. 3BCL9-siRNA effectively interfered with the expression of BCL9 in CaoV3 and ES-2 ovarian cancer cell lines. a Western blot showed that BCL9 expression was relatively high in CaoV3 and ES-2 ovarian cancer cell lines. b The results of the immunocytofluorescence test suggested that BCL9 was located in the nucleus and cytoplasm of CaoV3 and ES-2 cells, but mainly in the nucleus. c, d Western blot showed that BCL9 protein expression levels significantly decreased in BCL9-siRNA-transfected CaoV3 and ES-2 ovarian cancer cell lines (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01)
Fig. 4BCL9 may promote apoptosis and inhibit the proliferation of ovarian cancer cells by increasing the BAX/BCL2 expression ratio. a In CaoV3 cells, the maximum inhibition rate was observed 48 h after the inhibition of BCL9 expression, and the difference was statistically significant (*P < 0.05). b In ovarian ES-2 clear cell carcinoma, the maximum inhibition rate occurred 72 h after the inhibition of BCL9 expression (***P < 0.001). c, d No significant change in PCNA expression was detected by Western blot. e, f After inhibiting the expression of BCL9, the proportion of early apoptotic ovarian cancer cells increased (*P < 0.05). g, h After inhibiting the expression of BCL9, the expression of BCL2 decreased, the expression of BAX was unchanged, and the BAX/BCL2 expression ratio significantly increased. Significant differences from ES-2 cells were observed (*P < 0.05), with no significant differences from CaoV3 cells
Fig. 5Inhibition of BCL9 may inhibit the invasion and migration of ovarian cancer cells by inhibiting MMP2 and MMP9. a The results of the scratch test showed that the migration distance of ovarian cancer cells in the low BCL9 expression group after 24 h was significantly less than in the control group. b The transwell test results showed that the cell migration ability of ovarian cancer cells with low BCL9 expression decreased within 24 h compared with the control group, and the cell invasion ability decreased within 48 h. c, d After inhibiting BCL9 expression, the expression of MMP2 and MMP9 significantly decreased in ES-2 cells (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01), but BCL9 expression did not affect β-catenin expression
Fig. 6Using the Cbioportal and DAVID databases to analysis the pathway function of BCL9 and its associated molecular enrichment. a Biological processes that involve BCL9-related molecules. b Molecular function of BCL9-related molecules. The ordinate shows the name of the functional area. The abscissa shows the percentage of the corresponding part of the network as a whole. The bubble size indicates the number of genes that are located in the pathway or function. Colors indicate enriched P values. Deeper colors indicate more significant results
Fig. 7Enriched locations of the proteins encoded by BCL9-related molecules and the pathway regulatory network map of BCL9-related molecules. a Enriched locations of the proteins encoded by BCL9 related molecules. b Pathway regulation network map of BCL9-related molecules. The green circle represents the gene. The red triangle represents the enriched pathway
Fig. 8The GSEA indicated that samples with high BCL9 expression were also significantly enriched in the Wnt signaling pathway and the pathways in cancer. a Wnt signaling pathway. b Pathways in cancer