Literature DB >> 31826921

Logic model framework for considering the inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-research partnership.

Amir Alishahi Tabriz1, Susan A Flocke2,3, Deirdre Shires4, Karen E Dyer5, Michelle Schreiber6,7, Jennifer Elston Lafata8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The published literature provides few insights regarding how to develop or consider the effects of knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science.
OBJECTIVE: To describe how a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership was developed and used to design, develop and implement a practice-integrated decision support tool for patients with a physician recommendation for colorectal cancer screening.
DESIGN: Instrumental case study. PARTICIPANTS: Data were ascertained from project documentation records and semistructured questionnaires sent to 16 healthcare organisation leaders and staff, research investigators and research staff members.
RESULTS: Using a logic model framework, we organised the key inputs, processes and outcomes of a healthcare organisation-university-based research partnership. In addition to pragmatic researchers, partnership inputs included a healthcare organisation with a supportive practice environment and an executive-level project sponsor, a mid-level manager to serve as the organisational champion and continual access to organisational employees with relevant technical, policy and system/process knowledge. During programme design and implementation, partnership processes included using project team meetings, standing organisational meetings and one-on-one consultancies to provide platforms for shared learning and problem solving. Decision-making responsibility was shared between the healthcare organisation and research team. We discuss the short-term outcomes of the partnership, including how the partnership affected the current research team's knowledge and health system initiatives.
CONCLUSION: Using a logic model framework, we have described how a healthcare organisation-university-based research team partnership was developed. Others interested in developing, implementing and evaluating knowledge co-production partnerships in the context of delivery system science projects can use the experiences to consider ways to develop, implement and evaluate similar co-production partnerships. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  delivery system science; health care stakeholder engagement; implementation science; knowledge co-production; quality improvement

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31826921      PMCID: PMC8675565          DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010059

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf        ISSN: 2044-5415            Impact factor:   7.035


  48 in total

1.  Successes and failures in the implementation of evidence-based guidelines for clinical practice.

Authors:  R Grol
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Equality versus differentiation: the effects of power dispersion on group interaction.

Authors:  Lindred L Greer; Gerben A van Kleef
Journal:  J Appl Psychol       Date:  2010-11

3.  Physicians' awareness and attitudes toward decision aids for patients with cancer.

Authors:  Chantalle Brace; Selina Schmocker; Harden Huang; J Charles Victor; Robin S McLeod; Erin D Kennedy
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Identifying, monitoring, and assessing promising innovations: using evaluation to support rapid-cycle change.

Authors:  Marsha Gold; David Helms; Stuart Guterman
Journal:  Issue Brief (Commonw Fund)       Date:  2011-06

Review 5.  Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes.

Authors:  L Aubree Shay; Jennifer Elston Lafata
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 2.583

6.  Perceptions of knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Richard Stacy; William Alvin Torrence; Carol R Mitchell
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 7.  What is lacking in current decision aids on cancer screening?

Authors:  Masahito Jimbo; Gurpreet K Rana; Sarah Hawley; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Karen Kelly-Blake; Donald E Nease; Mack T Ruffin
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Inside the "Black Box" of a Knowledge Translation Program in Applied Health Research.

Authors:  Janet Heaton; Jo Day; Nicky Britten
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2015-04-08

9.  Using Co-Design to Develop a Collective Leadership Intervention for Healthcare Teams to Improve Safety Culture.

Authors:  Marie E Ward; Aoife De Brún; Deirdre Beirne; Clare Conway; Una Cunningham; Alan English; John Fitzsimons; Eileen Furlong; Yvonne Kane; Alan Kelly; Sinéad McDonnell; Sinead McGinley; Brenda Monaghan; Ann Myler; Emer Nolan; Róisín O'Donovan; Marie O'Shea; Arwa Shuhaiber; Eilish McAuliffe
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.390

10.  A theory of organizational readiness for change.

Authors:  Bryan J Weiner
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  5 in total

1.  Opportunities and Challenges When Using the Electronic Health Record for Practice-Integrated Patient-Facing Interventions: The e-Assist Colon Health Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jennifer Elston Lafata; Deirdre A Shires; Yongyun Shin; Susan Flocke; Kenneth Resnicow; Morgan Johnson; Ellen Nixon; Xinxin Sun; Sarah Hawley
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 2.749

2.  Development of a national health policy logic model to accelerate the integration of oncology and palliative care: a nationwide Delphi survey in Japan.

Authors:  Yu Uneno; Maki Iwai; Naoto Morikawa; Keita Tagami; Yoko Matsumoto; Junko Nozato; Takaomi Kessoku; Tatsunori Shimoi; Miyuki Yoshida; Aya Miyoshi; Ikuko Sugiyama; Kazuhiro Mantani; Mai Itagaki; Akemi Yamagishi; Tatsuya Morita; Akira Inoue; Manabu Muto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 3.850

3.  Conceptualizing researchers' perspectives on involving professionals in research: a group concept mapping study.

Authors:  Christine E Laustsen; Albert Westergren; Pia Petersson; Maria Haak
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2021-03-18

4.  Impact of Point of Care Quality Improvement Training and Coaching on Quality Perceptions of Health Care Workers: Implication for Quality Policy.

Authors:  Dewi Marhaeni Diah Herawati; Deni Kurniadi Sunjaya; Lani Gumilang; Fanny Adistie; Raden Tina Dewi Judistiani; Tetty Yuniati; Budi Handono
Journal:  J Multidiscip Healthc       Date:  2022-08-31

5.  Seeding Structures for a Community of Practice Focused on Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA): Implementing Across Disciplines and Waves.

Authors:  Lauren S Penney; Barbara J Homoya; Teresa M Damush; Nicholas A Rattray; Edward J Miech; Laura J Myers; Sean Baird; Ariel Cheatham; Dawn M Bravata
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.