Literature DB >> 35713754

Development of a national health policy logic model to accelerate the integration of oncology and palliative care: a nationwide Delphi survey in Japan.

Yu Uneno1, Maki Iwai2, Naoto Morikawa3, Keita Tagami4, Yoko Matsumoto5, Junko Nozato6, Takaomi Kessoku7,8, Tatsunori Shimoi9, Miyuki Yoshida10, Aya Miyoshi11, Ikuko Sugiyama12, Kazuhiro Mantani13, Mai Itagaki14, Akemi Yamagishi15, Tatsuya Morita16, Akira Inoue17, Manabu Muto1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite recommendations to deliver palliative care to cancer patients and their caregivers, their distress has not been alleviated satisfactorily. National health policies play a pivotal role in achieving a comprehensive range of quality palliative care delivery for the public. However, there is no standardised logic model to appraise the efficacy of these policies. This study aimed to develop a logic model of a national health policy to deliver cancer palliative care and to reach consensus towards specific policy proposals.
METHODS: A draft version of the logic model and specific policy proposals were formulated by the research team and the internal expert panel, and the independent external expert panel evaluated the policy proposals based on the Delphi survey to reach consensus.
RESULTS: The logic model was divided into three major conceptual categories: 'care-delivery at cancer hospitals', 'community care coordination', and 'social awareness of palliative care'. There were 18 and 45 major and minor policy proposals, which were categorised into four groups: requirement of government-designated cancer hospitals; financial support; Basic Plan to Promote Cancer Control Programs; and others. These policy proposals were independently evaluated by 64 external experts and the first to third Delphi round response rates were 96.9-98.4%. Finally, 47 policy proposals reached consensus. The priority of each proposal was evaluated within the four policy groups.
CONCLUSIONS: A national health policy logic model was developed to accelerate the provision of cancer palliative care. Further research is warranted to verify the study design to investigate the efficacy of the logic model.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Japan Society of Clinical Oncology.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cancer; Evidence-based policy making; Logic model; National health policy; Oncology; Palliative care

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35713754     DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02201-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 1341-9625            Impact factor:   3.850


  58 in total

1.  Effect of early and systematic integration of palliative care in patients with advanced cancer: a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Gaëlle Vanbutsele; Koen Pardon; Simon Van Belle; Veerle Surmont; Martine De Laat; Roos Colman; Kim Eecloo; Veronique Cocquyt; Karen Geboes; Luc Deliens
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 41.316

2.  Palliative and end-of-life care for the older adult with cancer.

Authors:  Lise Huynh; Jennifer Moore
Journal:  Curr Opin Support Palliat Care       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 2.302

Review 3.  Association Between Palliative Care and Patient and Caregiver Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dio Kavalieratos; Jennifer Corbelli; Di Zhang; J Nicholas Dionne-Odom; Natalie C Ernecoff; Janel Hanmer; Zachariah P Hoydich; Dara Z Ikejiani; Michele Klein-Fedyshin; Camilla Zimmermann; Sally C Morton; Robert M Arnold; Lucas Heller; Yael Schenker
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-11-22       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  European Society for Medical Oncology (ESMO) position paper on supportive and palliative care.

Authors:  K Jordan; M Aapro; S Kaasa; C I Ripamonti; F Scotté; F Strasser; A Young; E Bruera; J Herrstedt; D Keefe; B Laird; D Walsh; J Y Douillard; A Cervantes
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 32.976

Review 5.  Integration of Palliative Care Into Standard Oncology Care: American Society of Clinical Oncology Clinical Practice Guideline Update.

Authors:  Betty R Ferrell; Jennifer S Temel; Sarah Temin; Erin R Alesi; Tracy A Balboni; Ethan M Basch; Janice I Firn; Judith A Paice; Jeffrey M Peppercorn; Tanyanika Phillips; Ellen L Stovall; Camilla Zimmermann; Thomas J Smith
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-10-28       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 6.  Palliative, Ethics, and End-of-Life Care Issues in the Cancer Patient.

Authors:  Jamie C Riches; Louis P Voigt
Journal:  Crit Care Clin       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 3.598

7.  Palliative care service use in four European countries: a cross-national retrospective study via representative networks of general practitioners.

Authors:  Lara Pivodic; Koen Pardon; Lieve Van den Block; Viviane Van Casteren; Guido Miccinesi; Gé A Donker; Tomás Vega Alonso; José Lozano Alonso; Pierangelo Lora Aprile; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; Luc Deliens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Impact of palliative home care support on the quality and costs of care at the end of life: a population-level matched cohort study.

Authors:  Arno Maetens; Kim Beernaert; Robrecht De Schreye; Kristof Faes; Lieven Annemans; Koen Pardon; Luc Deliens; Joachim Cohen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-01-21       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The escalating global burden of serious health-related suffering: projections to 2060 by world regions, age groups, and health conditions.

Authors:  Katherine E Sleeman; Maja de Brito; Simon Etkind; Kennedy Nkhoma; Ping Guo; Irene J Higginson; Barbara Gomes; Richard Harding
Journal:  Lancet Glob Health       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 26.763

10.  Access to hospital and community palliative care for patients with advanced cancer: A longitudinal population analysis.

Authors:  Cheryl L Craigs; Robert M West; Adam Hurlow; Michael I Bennett; Lucy E Ziegler
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.