Literature DB >> 33736671

Conceptualizing researchers' perspectives on involving professionals in research: a group concept mapping study.

Christine E Laustsen1,2, Albert Westergren3,4, Pia Petersson3, Maria Haak3,4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Researchers have shown an increased interest in involving professionals from outside academia in research projects. Professionals are often involved in research on ageing and health when the purpose is to address the gap between research and practice. However, there is a need to acquire more knowledge about what the involvement might lead to by exploring researchers' experiences of involving professionals in research on ageing and health and developing conceptual areas. Therefore, the aim of this study was to identify conceptual areas of professionals' involvement in research on ageing and health, from the perspective of researchers themselves.
METHODS: Group concept mapping, a participatory and mixed method, was used to conceptualize areas. Researchers with experience of involving professionals in research projects on ageing and health participated in qualitative data collection through brainstorming sessions (n = 26), and by sorting statements (n = 27). They then took part in quantitative data collection, where they rated statements according to how much a statement strengthened research (n = 26) and strengthened practice (n = 24). Data were analysed using multidimensional scaling analysis and hierarchical cluster analysis. In addition, a qualitative analysis of the latent meaning of the cluster map was conducted.
RESULTS: Analysis of the sorting stage generated five clusters illustrating conceptual areas of professionals' involvement in research projects on ageing and health. The five clusters are as follows: complex collaboration throughout the research process; adaptation of research to different stakeholders, mutual learning through partnership; applicable and sustainable knowledge; legitimate research on ageing and health. The qualitative latent meaning of the cluster map showed two themes: the process of involvement and the outcome of involvement. A positive strong correlation (0.87) was found between the rating of strengthened research and practice.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals conceptual areas on a comprehensive and illustrative map which contributes to the understanding of professionals' involvement in research on ageing and health. A conceptual basis for further studies is offered, where the aim is to investigate the processes and outcomes entailed in involving professionals in research on ageing and health. The study also contributes to the development of instruments and theories for optimizing the involvement of professionals in research.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ageing and health; Group concept mapping; Involvement in research; Professionals; Researchers

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33736671      PMCID: PMC7977251          DOI: 10.1186/s12961-021-00685-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst        ISSN: 1478-4505


  32 in total

1.  Justifying knowledge, justifying method, taking action: epistemologies, methodologies, and methods in qualitative research.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter; Miles Little
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2007-12

2.  What is participatory research?

Authors:  A Cornwall; R Jewkes
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Group concept mapping for evaluation and development in nursing education.

Authors:  Peter Hagell; Ellinor Edfors; Gita Hedin; Albert Westergren; Catharina Sjödahl Hammarlund
Journal:  Nurse Educ Pract       Date:  2016-08-24       Impact factor: 2.281

4.  Researchers' experience of co-operative inquiry in acute mental health care.

Authors:  Jan Kåre Hummelvoll; Elisabeth Severinsson
Journal:  J Adv Nurs       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.187

5.  A Knowledge Translation framework on ageing and health.

Authors:  Moriah E Ellen; Ulysses Panisset; Islene Araujo de Carvalho; James Goodwin; John Beard
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Research funder required research partnerships: a qualitative inquiry.

Authors:  Shannon L Sibbald; Jacqueline Tetroe; Ian D Graham
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-11-28       Impact factor: 7.327

7.  Research with and about user participation: potentials and challenges.

Authors:  Marianne Kylberg; Maria Haak; Susanne Iwarsson
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-03-30       Impact factor: 3.636

8.  "One program that could improve health in this neighbourhood is ____?" using concept mapping to engage communities as part of a health and human services needs assessment.

Authors:  Alisa J Velonis; Agnes Molnar; Nakia Lee-Foon; Ashnoor Rahim; Mary Boushel; Patricia O'Campo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Frameworks for supporting patient and public involvement in research: Systematic review and co-design pilot.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Lisa Hinton; Teresa Finlay; Alastair Macfarlane; Nick Fahy; Ben Clyde; Alan Chant
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2019-04-22       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 10.  Research impact: a narrative review.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; James Raftery; Steve Hanney; Matthew Glover
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 8.775

View more
  1 in total

1.  User involvement in ageing and health research: a survey of researchers' and older adults' perspectives.

Authors:  Maya Kylén; Björn Slaug; Oskar Jonsson; Susanne Iwarsson; Steven M Schmidt
Journal:  Health Res Policy Syst       Date:  2022-09-01
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.