Literature DB >> 31826253

Stimulus visibility and uncertainty mediate the influence of attention on response bias and visual contrast appearance.

Sirawaj Itthipuripat1,2,3,4, Kai-Yu Chang5, Ashley Bong6, John T Serences4,7.   

Abstract

Although attention is known to improve the efficacy of sensory processing, the impact of attention on subjective visual appearance is still a matter of debate. Although recent studies suggest that attention can alter the appearance of stimulus contrast, others argue that these changes reflect response bias induced by attention cues. Here, we provide evidence that attention has effects on both appearance and response bias. In a comparative judgment task in which subjects reported whether the attended or unattended visual stimulus had a higher perceived contrast, attention induced substantial baseline-offset response bias as well as small but significant changes in subjective contrast appearance when subjects viewed near-threshold stimuli. However, when subjects viewed suprathreshold stimuli, baseline-offset response bias decreased and attention primarily changed contrast appearance. To address the possibility that these changes in appearance might be influenced by uncertainty due to the attended and unattended stimuli having similar physical contrasts, subjects performed an equality judgment task in which they reported if the contrast of the two stimuli was the same or different. We found that, although there were still attention-induced changes in contrast appearance at lower contrasts, the robust changes in contrast appearance at higher contrasts observed in the comparative judgment task were diminished in the equality judgment task. Together, these results suggest that attention can impact both response bias and appearance, and these two types of attention effects are differentially mediated by stimulus visibility and uncertainty. Collectively, these findings help constrain arguments about the cognitive penetrability of perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31826253      PMCID: PMC6908139          DOI: 10.1167/19.14.8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis        ISSN: 1534-7362            Impact factor:   2.240


  68 in total

1.  Feature-based attention influences motion processing gain in macaque visual cortex.

Authors:  S Treue; J C Martínez Trujillo
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1999-06-10       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Attention alters decision criteria but not appearance: a reanalysis of Anton-Erxleben, Abrams, and Carrasco (2010).

Authors:  Keith A Schneider
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Attention biases decisions but does not alter appearance.

Authors:  Keith A Schneider; Marcell Komlos
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-11-10       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  The effects of spatial attention in early human visual cortex are stimulus independent.

Authors:  Scott O Murray
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2008-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Consciousness, accessibility, and the mesh between psychology and neuroscience.

Authors:  Ned Block
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 12.579

6.  Focused attention distorts visual space: an attentional repulsion effect.

Authors:  S Suzuki; P Cavanagh
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 7.  Visual attention mitigates information loss in small- and large-scale neural codes.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Sameer Saproo; John T Serences
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2015-03-11       Impact factor: 20.229

8.  Having More Choices Changes How Human Observers Weight Stable Sensory Evidence.

Authors:  Sirawaj Itthipuripat; Kexin Cha; Sean Deering; Annalisa M Salazar; John T Serences
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 9.  Attentional enhancement of spatial resolution: linking behavioural and neurophysiological evidence.

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 34.870

10.  Cue contrast modulates the effects of exogenous attention on appearance.

Authors:  Stuart Fuller; Yunsoo Park; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  2 in total

1.  Spontaneous Alpha-Band Oscillations Bias Subjective Contrast Perception.

Authors:  Elio Balestrieri; Niko A Busch
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-05-18       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Exogenous spatial attention shortens perceived depth.

Authors:  Wanyi Guan; Jiehui Qian
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2020-08
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.