| Literature DB >> 31823815 |
Mohammed A Assiri1, Hadi R Ali2, John O Marentette2, Youngho Yun2, Juan Liu3, Matthew D Hirschey3,4, Laura M Saba2, Peter S Harris2, Kristofer S Fritz5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Chronic alcohol consumption is a significant cause of liver disease worldwide. Several biochemical mechanisms have been linked to the initiation and progression of alcoholic liver disease (ALD) such as oxidative stress, inflammation, and metabolic dysregulation, including the disruption of NAD+/NADH. Indeed, an ethanol-mediated reduction in hepatic NAD+ levels is thought to be one factor underlying ethanol-induced steatosis, oxidative stress, steatohepatitis, insulin resistance, and inhibition of gluconeogenesis. Therefore, we applied a NAD+ boosting supplement to investigate alterations in the pathogenesis of early-stage ALD.Entities:
Keywords: ATF3; Alcoholic liver disease; ERK1/2; Liver; NMN; RNA-seq; Sirtuin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31823815 PMCID: PMC6902345 DOI: 10.1186/s40246-019-0251-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Hum Genomics ISSN: 1473-9542 Impact factor: 4.639
Fig. 1Differential ethanol effects on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). a Treatment with NMN prevents an ethanol-induced increase in plasma ALT. b NMN treatment prevents an ethanol-mediated increase in AST plasma levels (mean +/− SEM) (n = 4 to 5 per treatment combination) (*p < 0.05)
Fig. 2Metabolomics profile of hepatic tissue assessing the impact of NMN therapy in a model of ethanol toxicity. a NMN treatment significantly alters metabolites of nicotinamide metabolism. b TCA cycle metabolites are moderately altered due to NMN supplementation (mean +/− SEM) (n ≥ 4) (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001)
Fig. 3Ethanol effects on RNA expression levels via RNA sequencing analysis. a Pipeline for identification of NMN-dependent and NMN-independent ethanol effects on RNA expression levels. b RNA expression differences across the treatment (NMN and ethanol) combinations for genes with NMN-dependent ethanol effects. Each row represents a gene with a significant ethanol effect (FDR < 0.05) that was classified as NMN-dependent (differential ethanol p < 0.05; 437 genes). Expression levels are shown as the ratio of average expression level in each treatment combination (columns) to the average expression in the Control Saline group. Expression levels were log base 2 transformed prior to analyses and graphing. Values in the key have be back transformed to increase interpretability
Genes from the RNA-seq dataset that have an ethanol effect 10-fold or greater (FDR < 0.05) and a differential effect of ethanol of (p < 0.0001)
| Gene symbol | Gene description | Overall effect of ethanol FDR (unadjusted | Differential effect of ethanol in NMN and saline groups FDR (unadjusted | Ethanol effect in saline group (ethanol expression as percent of control expression) | Ethanol effect in NMN group (ethanol expression as percent of control expression) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hmox1 | Heme oxygenase 1 | 3.6e−135 (2.6e−139) | 3.6e-20 (3.4e−24) | 1902% | 328% |
| Nr4a1 | Nuclear receptor subfamily 4 | 4.9e−26 (4.9e−29) | 1.0e-06 (2.9e−10) | 1057% | 123% |
| Trib3 | Tribbles pseudokinase 3 | 3.2e−54 (9.2e−58) | 4.0e-06 (1.5e−09) | 1483% | 281% |
| Atf3 | Activating transcription factor 3 | 2.6e−23 (3.2e−26) | 1.7e-02 (3.9e−05) | 3711% | 522% |
| Clec2h | C-type lectin domain family 2 | 1.3e−10 (1.0e−12) | 1.9e-02 (5.2e−05) | 9% | 69% |
Fig. 4Pathway analysis and enrichment (p < 0.05) of a NMN-dependent ethanol genes and b NMN-independent ethanol genes. The top three (via p value) pathways enriched for genes with NMN-dependent ethanol effects: c amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism, d steroid hormone biosynthesis, and e MAPK signaling pathway. In these heatmaps, each row represents a gene with a significant ethanol effect (FDR < 0.05) that was classified as NMN-dependent (differential ethanol p < 0.05). Expression levels are shown as the ratio of average expression level in each treatment combination (columns) to the average expression in the Control Saline group. Expression levels were log base 2 transformed prior to analyses and graphing. Values in the key have be back transformed to increase interpretability
Fig. 5Effect of NMN treatment on Erk, P38, and Atf3. a Western blot image of phosho-Erk1/2, Erk1/2, phospho-P38, P38, and Atf3. b Densitometric analysis of phospho-Erk1/2 immunoblot normalized to total Erk1/2. c Densitometric analysis of phosphorylated P38 normalized to total P38. d Densitometric analysis of Atf3 western blot (mean +/− SEM) (***p < 0.001)