| Literature DB >> 31818330 |
Jing Luo1, Xiaohua Dong2, Jing Hu3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Nursing intervention following discharge is a long-term rehabilitation process that is essential for improving hip joint function and quality of life in affected patients. This study aimed to assess the effect of nursing intervention via WeChat on the rehabilitation of patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA).Entities:
Keywords: Elderly patients; Nursing intervention; Rehabilitation; Total hip arthroplasty; WeChat
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31818330 PMCID: PMC6902538 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1483-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Comparison of basic characteristics between groups
| Items | Group A ( | Group B ( |
|---|---|---|
| Gender (male) | 35 (29.9%) | 36 (30.3%) |
| Age (years) | 73.9 ± 12.9 (65–87) | 72.5 ± 13.1 (64–85) |
| Operation time (min) | 90.5 ± 10.0 (81–125) | 91.6 ± 14 (76–132) |
| Blood loss (ml) | 320.1 ± 29 (250–500) | 310.3 ± 32 (253–550) |
| Living alone | 55 (48.3%) | 61 (51.7%) |
| Dependent on help | 35 (30.7%) | 36 (30.5%) |
| Monthly income | ||
| | 15 (13.2%) | 16 (13.6%) |
| 200–500 US | 78 (68.4%) | 79 (66.9%) |
| > 500 US | 21 (18.4%) | 23 (19.5%) |
Data are presented as n (%) or mean ± standard deviation (range)
Comparison of Harris hip scores between groups
| Groups | N | At discharge | 1 month following discharge | 3 months following discharge | 6 months following discharge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 114 | 61.10 ± 9.42 | 69.1 ± 6.3 | 74.3 ± 9.6 | 82.54 ± 7.46 |
| Group B | 118 | 62.32 ± 8.25 | 70.0 ± 6.5 | 80.5 ± 8.9* | 91.24 ± 9.08* |
*p < 0.05, Comparison between groups A and B
Comparison of Short Form-36 health survey scale scores between groups
| Groups | n | At discharge | 1 month following discharge | 3 months following discharge | 6 months following discharge |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group A | 114 | 387.4 ± 83.2 | 465.1 ± 76.0 | 584.1 ± 85.6 | 670.6 ± 89.5 |
| Group B | 118 | 391.9 ± 92.0 | 468.0 ± 86.0 | 632.4 ± 98.0* | 725.3 ± 86.5* |
*p < 0.05, Comparison between groups A and B
Comparison of functional independence between groups
| Groups | N | At discharge | 1 month following discharge | 3 months following discharge | 6 months following discharge | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complete dependence | Partial dependence | Complete independence | Complete dependence | Partial dependence | Complete independence | Complete dependence | Partial dependence | Complete independence | Complete dependence | Partial dependence | Complete independence | ||
| Group A | 114 | 44 | 60 | 10 | 6 | 92 | 16 | 1 | 80 | 33 | 0 | 10 | 104 |
| Group B | 118 | 43 | 64 | 11 | 5 | 90 | 23* | 0 | 60* | 58* | 0 | 1* | 117* |
*p < 0.05, Comparison between groups A and B