| Literature DB >> 31817514 |
Józef S Pastuszka1, Walter Mucha1, Agnieszka Wlazło2, Danuta Lis2, Ewa Marchwińska-Wyrwał3, Anna Mainka1.
Abstract
(1) Background: Since exposure to airborne bacteria and fungi may be especially hazardous in hospitals and outpatient clinics, it is essential to sterilize the air in such rooms. The purpose of this study was to estimate the decrease in the concentration of airborne bacteria and fungi in the selected hospital and clinic rooms due to the work of the electron wind generator (EWG). (2)Entities:
Keywords: bacteria; bacteria size-distribution; electron wind generator (EWG); fungi; fungi size-distribution; hospitals; ozone; patient room; waiting room
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817514 PMCID: PMC6950108 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16244935
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Figure 1Photograph of the electron wind generator (EWG) device.
Characteristics of sampling sites in hospitals.
| Sampling Site | City | Volume, m3 | No. | Temperature Indoors, °C | Relative Humidity, % | Ventilation | Windows |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Patient room | Sosnowiec | 30 | 4–5 | 24 | 65–54 | mechanical | closed |
| Patient room | Zabrze | 110 | 8 | 23 | 79–80 | natural | opened |
| Waiting room (WR) | Sosnowiec | 77 | 4–13 * | 22 | 62–66 | natural | closed |
* Plus 2–3 persons crossing this room.
Changes in the concentration level of bacterial and fungal aerosol in the small patient’s room (PRS) at the hospital in Sosnowiec due to the sterilization using one EWG device.
| Concentration of Viable Microorganisms in the Room [CFU m−3] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Background | 2 h | 4 h | Background | 2 h | 4 h | |
| CTotal | 204 | 63 | 49 | 341 | 261 | 84 |
| CResp | 91 | 42 | 21 | 257 | 261 | 84 |
| CResp/CTotal | 0.45 | 0.67 | 0.43 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| RH, % | 65 | 58 | 54 | 65 | 58 | 54 |
| C4 hours Total/CBackground Total | 0.24 | 0.25 | ||||
Resp. particles with d < 4.7 μm. CFU, colony-forming units.
Changes in the concentration level of bacterial and fungal aerosol in the large patient’s room (PRL) at the University Hospital in Zabrze due to the sterilization using one EWG device.
| Concentration of Viable Microorganisms in the Room [CFU m−3] | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Background | 2 h | 4 h | Background | 2 h | 4 h | |
| CTotal | 848 | 452 | 445 | 872 | 854 | 698 |
| CResp | 721 | 339 | 346 | 784 | 763 | 635 |
| CResp/CTotal | 0.85 | 0.75 | 0.78 | 0.90 | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| RH, % | 80 | 79 | 80 | 80 | 79 | 80 |
| C4 hours Total/CBackground Total | 0.52 | 0.80 | ||||
Resp. particles with d < 4.7 μm.
Changes in the concentration level of bacterial and fungal aerosol in the waiting room (outpatient room), WR, at the clinic of occupational diseases in Sosnowiec due to the sterilization using one EWG device.
| Concentration of Viable Microorganisms in the Room [CFU m−3] | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| ||||||
| Background | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | Background | 1 h | 2 h | 4 h | |
| CTotal | 1181 | 1040 | 706 | 501 | 713 | 671 | 515 | 345 |
| CResp | 849 | 927 | 451 | 268 | 650 | 622 | 459 | 268 |
| CResp/CTotal | 0.72 | 0.89 | 0.64 | 0.53 | 0.91 | 0.93 | 0.89 | 0.78 |
| RH, % | 75 | 66 | 64 | 62 | 75 | 66 | 64 | 62 |
| C4 hours Total/CBackground Total | 0.42 | 0.48 | ||||||
Resp. particles with d < 4.7 μm.
Figure 2Long-time decrease of the concentration level of airborne bacteria and fungi in the waiting room at the clinic in Sosnowiec due to the air sterilization using the EWG device.
Figure 3Size distribution of airborne bacteria in the patient’s room (PRS) at the hospital in Sosnowiec: (a) background, (b) 4 hours after the start of sterilization using the EWG device.
Figure 4Size distribution of airborne fungi in the patient’s room (PRS) at the Hospital in Sosnowiec: (a) Background, (b) 4 hours after the start of sterilization using the EWG device.
Changes in the viable bacteria genera in the patients’ room (PRL) at the University Hospital in Zabrze, after 4 hours of sterilization by using the EWG cleaner (two cleaners worked, started at 10:00 after measuring the “background” concentration).
| Bacteria Species and Genera | Background | 4 Hours of Sterilization * | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [CFU m−3] | [%] | [CFU m−3] | [%] | |
| Gram-positive cocci, including: | 573 | 77 | 381 | 90 |
|
| 198 | 0 | ||
|
| 74 | 148 | ||
|
| 11 | 14 | ||
|
| 85 | 0 | ||
|
| 11 | 7 | ||
| 166 | 191 | |||
|
| 28 | 21 | ||
| Non-sporing gram-positive rods, including: | 140 | 19 | 28 | 7 |
|
| 75 | 0 | ||
|
| 25 | 7 | ||
|
| 25 | 7 | ||
|
| 4 | 0 | ||
| 11 | 0 | |||
| 0 | 14 | |||
| Actinomycetes, including: | 33 | 14 | 3 | |
| 21 | 14 | |||
| Others | 12 | 4 | 0 | |
| Total | 746 | 100 | 423 | 100 |
* During 4 hour measurements, two patients went to the toilet (not simultaneously). One patient returned after 15 minutes and the other after about 20 minutes.
Time dependence of the concentration of ozone in the office room (ORL) sterilized by using the EWG device.
| Concentration of | Sterilization Time [h] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2 | 4 | 6 | |
| (Background) | ||||
| without carbon filter | 0.50 | 2.65 | 3.15 | 3.25 |
| with carbon filter | 0.20 | 0.60 | 1.20 | 1.25 |
Changes in the concentration level of bacterial aerosol in the office room (ORS) due to the sterilization using one EWG device having a carbon filter.
| Parameter | Concentration of Viable Bacteria in the Room [CFU m−3] | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 1 | 6 | 9 | |
| (Background) | (Time, in Hours, Counted from the Beginning of Sterilization) | |||
| CTotal | 1293 | 1166 | 385 | 293 |
| Cn hours/CBackground | 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.30 | 0.23 |