Literature DB >> 12639832

Bioaerosol health effects and exposure assessment: progress and prospects.

J Douwes1, P Thorne, N Pearce, D Heederik.   

Abstract

Exposures to bioaerosols in the occupational environment are associated with a wide range of health effects with major public health impact, including infectious diseases, acute toxic effects, allergies and cancer. Respiratory symptoms and lung function impairment are the most widely studied and probably among the most important bioaerosol-associated health effects. In addition to these adverse health effects some protective effects of microbial exposure on atopy and atopic conditions has also been suggested. New industrial activities have emerged in recent years in which exposures to bioaerosols can be abundant, e.g. the waste recycling and composting industry, biotechnology industries producing highly purified enzymes and the detergent and food industries that make use of these enzymes. Dose-response relationships have not been established for most biological agents and knowledge about threshold values is sparse. Exposure limits are available for some contaminants, e.g. wood dust, subtilisins (bacterial enzymes) and flour dust. Exposure limits for bacterial endotoxin have been proposed. Risk assessment is seriously hampered by the lack of valid quantitative exposure assessment methods. Traditional culture methods to quantify microbial exposures have proven to be of limited use. Non-culture methods and assessment methods for microbial constituents [e.g. allergens, endotoxin, beta(1-->3)-glucans, fungal extracellular polysaccharides] appear more successful; however, experience with these methods is generally limited. Therefore, more research is needed to establish better exposure assessment tools and validate newly developed methods. Other important areas that require further research include: potential protective effects of microbial exposures on atopy and atopic diseases, inter-individual susceptibility for biological exposures, interactions of bioaerosols with non-biological agents and other potential health effects such as skin and neurological conditions and birth effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12639832     DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meg032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Occup Hyg        ISSN: 0003-4878


  197 in total

1.  Characterization of airborne bacteria at an underground subway station.

Authors:  Marius Dybwad; Per Einar Granum; Per Bruheim; Janet Martha Blatny
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  Bioaerosol exposure assessment in the workplace: the past, present and recent advances.

Authors:  Wijnand Eduard; Dick Heederik; Caroline Duchaine; Brett James Green
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2012-01-23

3.  The ecology of microscopic life in household dust.

Authors:  Albert Barberán; Robert R Dunn; Brian J Reich; Krishna Pacifici; Eric B Laber; Holly L Menninger; James M Morton; Jessica B Henley; Jonathan W Leff; Shelly L Miller; Noah Fierer
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-09-07       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Quantitative assessment of bio-aerosols contamination in indoor air of University dormitory rooms.

Authors:  Samuel Fekadu Hayleeyesus; Amanuel Ejeso; Fikirte Aklilu Derseh
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2015-07

5.  Development of a new portable air sampler based on electrostatic precipitation.

Authors:  J M Roux; R Sarda-Estève; G Delapierre; M H Nadal; C Bossuet; L Olmedo
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2015-10-10       Impact factor: 4.223

Review 6.  The two sides of the "endotoxin coin".

Authors:  K Radon
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

7.  Agricultural seed dust as a potential cause of organic dust toxic syndrome.

Authors:  L A M Smit; I M Wouters; M M Hobo; W Eduard; G Doekes; D Heederik
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Release of free DNA by membrane-impaired bacterial aerosols due to aerosolization and air sampling.

Authors:  Huajun Zhen; Taewon Han; Donna E Fennell; Gediminas Mainelis
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 4.792

9.  Biological dust exposure in the workplace is a risk factor for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Authors:  M C Matheson; G Benke; J Raven; M R Sim; H Kromhout; R Vermeulen; D P Johns; E H Walters; M J Abramson
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 9.139

10.  Exposure assessment in Beijing, China: biological agents, ultrafine particles, and lead.

Authors:  Shuofei Dong; Maosheng Yao
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2009-11-11       Impact factor: 2.513

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.