| Literature DB >> 31817420 |
María Trelis1,2, Silvia Taroncher-Ferrer1,3, Mónica Gozalbo4, Vicente Ortiz5, José M Soriano2,6, Antonio Osuna7, Juan F Merino-Torres2,8,9.
Abstract
Nowadays, scientific studies are emerging on the possible etiological role of intestinal parasites in functional digestive disorders. Our study was carried out with healthy individuals (control group; n = 82) and symptomatic patients with lactose or fructose malabsorption, including positive (malabsorbers; n = 213) and negative (absorbers; n = 56) breath test, being analyzed for the presence of intestinal parasites. A high parasitic prevalence was observed in malabsorbers (41.8%), exclusively due to single-cell eukaryotes but not helminths. Giardia intestinalis was the predominant parasite in cases of abnormal absorption (26.5%), significantly associated with fructose malabsorption and doubling the probability of developing this pathology. Within controls, Blastocystis sp. (13.4%) was almost the only parasite, being the second among patients (12.6%), and Cryptosporidium parvum, the last species of clinical relevance, was detected exclusively in two malabsorbers (0.9%). The consumption of ecological food and professions with direct contact with humans arose as risk factors of parasitism. A diagnosis of carbohydrate malabsorption in adulthood is the starting point, making the search for the primary cause necessary. Accurate parasitological diagnosis should be considered another tool in the clinical routine for patients with recurrent symptoms, since their condition may be reversible with adequate therapeutic intervention.Entities:
Keywords: Blastocystis sp.; Giardia intestinalis; carbohydrates; fructose; malabsorption; parasites; risk factors
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31817420 PMCID: PMC6950212 DOI: 10.3390/nu11122973
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Characteristics at baseline of the patients enrolled in the study.
| Malabsorbers (213) | Absorbers (56) | |
|---|---|---|
| Gender | ||
| Female, | 172 (80.8%) | 37 (66.1%) |
| Male, | 41 (19.2%) | 19 (33.9%) |
| Age | ||
| Years (mean) | 40.5 | 47.4 |
| minimum‒maximum | 29‒55 | 30‒64 |
| Type of malabsorption | ||
| Fructose, | 171 (80.3%) | |
| Lactose, | 127 (59.6%) | |
| Combined, | 84 (39.4%) | |
| Gastrointestinal symptoms | ||
| Diarrhea, | 204 (95.8%) | 50 (89.3%) |
| Constipation, | 112 (52.6%) | 22 (39.3%) |
| Abdominal distension (VAS > 5), | 197 (92.5%) | 49 (87.5%) |
| Flatulence (VAS > 5), | 203 (95.3%) | 51 (91.1%) |
| Comorbidities | ||
| Irritable Bowel Syndrome, | 22 (10.3%) | 7 (39.2%) |
| Inflammatory Bowel Disease, | 5 (2.4%) | |
| Celiac Disease, | 6 (2.8%) | |
n = number of cases; % = relative frequency; VAS: visual analogue scale.
Presence of intestinal parasites depending on the group of study.
| Intestinal Parasites | Patients (269) | Grouped Patients (269) | Controls (82) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Malabsorbers (213) | Absorbers (56) | |||||||
|
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | |
|
| 56 | 26.3 * | 10 | 17.9 * | 66 | 24.5 | 1 | 1.2 |
| 29 | 13.6 | 5 | 8.9 | 34 | 12.6 | 11 | 13.4 | |
|
| 1 | 0.5 | 2 | 3.6 | 3 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 5.4 | 3 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 1 | 0.5 | 3 | 5.4 | 4 | 1.1 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 2 | 0.9 | 0 | 0.0 | 2 | 0.7 | 0 | 0.0 |
|
| 0 | 0.0 | 1 | 1.8 | 1 | 0.4 | 0 | 0.0 |
| Total | 89 | 41.8 | 24 | 42.9 | 113 | 42.0 | 12 | 14.6 |
n = number of cases; % = relative frequency; # Combination of diagnostic methods; * Statistically significant (p ˂ 0.05) respect to control.
Laboratory test for G. intestinalis detection in the study population (n = 351).
| Feces | Saliva | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Immunochromatography | Light Microscopy | Indirect ELISA | |
| Positive (69) | 10 (2.8%) | 17 (4.8%) | 62 (17.7%) |
| Negative (282) | 341 (97.2%) | 334 (95.2%) | 289 (82.3%) |
Figure 1Swarm plot of levels of (a) vitamin A, (b) vitamin D in the study group, and (c) G. intestinalis and vitamin A in studied malabsorbers. * Statistically significant (p < 0.05) respect to control.
Analysis of predictors of intestinal parasites in the study population.
| Variables |
| With IP | OR | 95% CI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| % | |||||
| Nationality of risk | 17 | 9 | 52.9 | 1.32 | 0.41, 4.29 | 0.640 |
| Profession of risk | 56 | 26 | 46.4 | 2.16 | 1.14, 4.21 | 0.022 * |
| Contact with animals | 89 | 37 | 41.6 | 1.67 | 0.95, 2.92 | 0.072 |
| Regular consumption of ecological food | 180 | 95 | 52.8 | 6.81 | 4.03, 11.9 | 0.001 * |
| Having travelled to endemic countries in the last five years | 75 | 37 | 49.3 | 1.90 | 1.03, 3.57 | 0.040 * |
IP: Intestinal Parasites; N: n of individuals that registered this variable; n: n of individuals with IP and this variable; OR: Odds Ratio; CI: Confidence Interval; * significant association (p ˂ 0.05).
Distribution of specific carbohydrate malabsorption among G. intestinalis and Blastocystis sp. cases.
| Type of Malabsorption |
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Association | OR | 95% CI | Association | OR | 95% CI | |||
| Fructose | 89.5% | 3.21 | 1.8‒5.7 | ˂0.001 * | 51.1% | 0.85 | 0.4‒1.6 | 0.076 |
| Lactose | 50.0% | 1.23 | 0.7‒2.3 | 0.089 | 42.2% | 1.24 | 0.6‒2.4 | 0.099 |
OR: odds ratio; CI: confidence interval; * significant association (p ˂ 0.05).