Literature DB >> 31815476

Benchmarking the Performance of Time-Dependent Density Functional Theory Methods on Biochromophores.

Yihan Shao1, Ye Mei2,3, Dage Sundholm4, Ville R I Kaila5,6.   

Abstract

Quantum chemical calculations are important for elucidating light-capturing mechanisms in photobiological systems. The time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) has become a popular methodology because of its balance between accuracy and computational scaling, despite its problems in describing, for example, charge transfer states. As a step toward systematically understanding the performance of TDDFT calculations on biomolecular systems, we study here 17 commonly used density functionals, including seven long-range separated functionals, and compare the obtained results with excitation energies calculated at the approximate second order coupled-cluster theory level (CC2). The benchmarking set includes the first five singlet excited states of 11 chemical analogues of biochromophores from the green fluorescent protein, rhodopsin/bacteriorhodopsin (Rh/bR), and the photoactive yellow protein. We find that commonly used pure density functionals such as BP86, PBE, M11-L, and hybrid functionals with 20-25% of Hartree-Fock (HF) exchange (B3LYP, PBE0) have a tendency to consistently underestimate vertical excitation energies (VEEs) relative to the CC2 values, whereas hybrid density functionals with around 50% HF exchange such as BHLYP, PBE50, and M06-2X and long-range corrected functionals such as CAM-B3LYP, ωPBE, ωPBEh, ωB97X, ωB97XD, BNL, and M11 overestimate the VEEs. We observe that calculations using the CAM-B3LYP and ωPBEh functionals with 65% and 100% long-range HF exchange, respectively, lead to an overestimation of the VEEs by 0.2-0.3 eV for the benchmarking set. To reduce the systematic error, we introduce here two new empirical functionals, CAMh-B3LYP and ωhPBE0, for which we adjusted the long-range HF exchange to 50%. The introduced parameterization reduces the mean signed average (MSA) deviation to 0.07 eV and the root mean square (rms) deviation to 0.17 eV as compared to the CC2 values. In the present study, TDDFT calculations using the aug-def2-TZVP basis sets, the best performing functionals relative to CC2 are ωhPBE0 (rms = 0.17, MSA = 0.06 eV); CAMh-B3LYP (rms = 0.16, MSA = 0.07 eV); and PBE0 (rms = 0.23, MSA = -0.14 eV). For the popular range-separated CAM-B3LYP functional, we obtain an rms value of 0.31 eV and an MSA value of 0.25 eV, which can be compared with the rms and MSA values of 0.37 and -0.31 eV, respectively, as obtained at the B3LYP level.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31815476      PMCID: PMC7391796          DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00823

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  81 in total

1.  Benchmarking the performance of time-dependent density functional methods.

Authors:  Sarom S Leang; Federico Zahariev; Mark S Gordon
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.488

2.  Benchmark results for empirical post-GGA functionals: difficult exchange problems and independent tests.

Authors:  Narbe Mardirossian; John A Parkhill; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.676

3.  Extensive TD-DFT Benchmark: Singlet-Excited States of Organic Molecules.

Authors:  Denis Jacquemin; Valérie Wathelet; Eric A Perpète; Carlo Adamo
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2009-08-11       Impact factor: 6.006

4.  Calculation of excited-state properties using general coupled-cluster and configuration-interaction models.

Authors:  Mihály Kállay; Jürgen Gauss
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2004-11-15       Impact factor: 3.488

5.  Long-range corrected hybrid density functionals with damped atom-atom dispersion corrections.

Authors:  Jeng-Da Chai; Martin Head-Gordon
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2008-09-29       Impact factor: 3.676

6.  Density-functional exchange-energy approximation with correct asymptotic behavior.

Authors: 
Journal:  Phys Rev A Gen Phys       Date:  1988-09-15

7.  Multireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules.

Authors:  Hans Lischka; Dana Nachtigallová; Adélia J A Aquino; Péter G Szalay; Felix Plasser; Francisco B C Machado; Mario Barbatti
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2018-07-24       Impact factor: 60.622

8.  How method-dependent are calculated differences between vertical, adiabatic, and 0-0 excitation energies?

Authors:  Changfeng Fang; Baswanth Oruganti; Bo Durbeej
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.781

9.  Effect of protein environment on electronically excited and ionized states of the green fluorescent protein chromophore.

Authors:  Ksenia B Bravaya; Maria G Khrenova; Bella L Grigorenko; Alexander V Nemukhin; Anna I Krylov
Journal:  J Phys Chem B       Date:  2011-06-06       Impact factor: 2.991

10.  Theoretical Studies on the Color-Tuning Mechanism in Retinal Proteins.

Authors:  Kazuhiro Fujimoto; Shigehiko Hayashi; Jun-Ya Hasegawa; Hiroshi Nakatsuji
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 6.006

View more
  13 in total

1.  Analysis and visualization of energy densities. II. Insights from linear-response time-dependent density functional theory calculations.

Authors:  Zheng Pei; Junjie Yang; Jingheng Deng; Yuezhi Mao; Qin Wu; Zhibo Yang; Bin Wang; Christine M Aikens; Wanzhen Liang; Yihan Shao
Journal:  Phys Chem Chem Phys       Date:  2020-12-07       Impact factor: 3.676

Review 2.  Carbon Nanodots from an In Silico Perspective.

Authors:  Francesca Mocci; Leon de Villiers Engelbrecht; Chiara Olla; Antonio Cappai; Maria Francesca Casula; Claudio Melis; Luigi Stagi; Aatto Laaksonen; Carlo Maria Carbonaro
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 72.087

3.  Evaluation of molecular photophysical and photochemical properties using linear response time-dependent density functional theory with classical embedding: Successes and challenges.

Authors:  WanZhen Liang; Zheng Pei; Yuezhi Mao; Yihan Shao
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2022-06-07       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 4.  Rhodopsins: An Excitingly Versatile Protein Species for Research, Development and Creative Engineering.

Authors:  Willem J de Grip; Srividya Ganapathy
Journal:  Front Chem       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 5.545

5.  UV-adVISor: Attention-Based Recurrent Neural Networks to Predict UV-Vis Spectra.

Authors:  Fabio Urbina; Kushal Batra; Kevin J Luebke; Jason D White; Daniel Matsiev; Lori L Olson; Jeremiah P Malerich; Maggie A Z Hupcey; Peter B Madrid; Sean Ekins
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2021-11-23       Impact factor: 8.008

6.  Computing molecular excited states on a D-Wave quantum annealer.

Authors:  Alexander Teplukhin; Brian K Kendrick; Susan M Mniszewski; Yu Zhang; Ashutosh Kumar; Christian F A Negre; Petr M Anisimov; Sergei Tretiak; Pavel A Dub
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 4.996

7.  Protein Matrix Control of Reaction Center Excitation in Photosystem II.

Authors:  Abhishek Sirohiwal; Frank Neese; Dimitrios A Pantazis
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2020-10-09       Impact factor: 15.419

8.  Density Functional Theory Evaluation of a Photoinduced Intramolecular Aryl Ether Rearrangement.

Authors:  Péter Pál Fehér
Journal:  J Org Chem       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 4.354

9.  Benchmarking Magnetizabilities with Recent Density Functionals.

Authors:  Susi Lehtola; Maria Dimitrova; Heike Fliegl; Dage Sundholm
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2021-02-18       Impact factor: 6.006

10.  Assessment of the Ab Initio Bethe-Salpeter Equation Approach for the Low-Lying Excitation Energies of Bacteriochlorophylls and Chlorophylls.

Authors:  Zohreh Hashemi; Linn Leppert
Journal:  J Phys Chem A       Date:  2021-03-03       Impact factor: 2.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.