Literature DB >> 24629350

Multimodal imaging in cerebral gliomas and its neuropathological correlation.

Jens Gempt1, Eric Soehngen2, Stefan Förster3, Yu-Mi Ryang4, Jürgen Schlegel5, Claus Zimmer6, Bernhard Meyer4, Florian Ringel4, Astrid E Grams7, Annette Förschler6.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Concerning the preoperative clinical diagnostic work-up of glioma patients, tumor heterogeneity challenges the oncological therapy. The current study assesses the performance of a multimodal imaging approach to differentiate between areas in malignant gliomas and to investigate the extent to which such a combinatorial imaging approach might predict the underlying histology.
METHODS: Prior to surgical resection, patients harboring intracranial gliomas underwent MRIs (MR-S, PWI) and (18)F-FET-PETs. Intratumoral and peritumoral biopsy targets were defined, by MRI only, by FET-PET only, and by MRI and FET-PET combined, and biopsied prior to surgical resection and which then received separate histopathological examinations.
RESULTS: In total, 38 tissue samples were acquired (seven glioblastomas, one anaplastic astrocytoma, one anaplastic oligoastrocytoma, one diffuse astrocytoma, and one oligoastrocytoma) and underwent histopathological analysis. The highest mean values of Mib1 and CD31 were found in the target point "T' defined by MRI and FET-PET combined. A significant correlation between NAA/Cr and PET tracer uptake (-0.845, p<0.05) as well as Cho/Cr ratio and cell density (0.742, p<0.05) and NAA/Cr ratio and MIB-1 (-0761, p<0.05) was disclosed for this target point, though not for target points defined by MRI and FET-PET alone.
CONCLUSION: Multimodal-imaging-guided stereotactic biopsy correlated more with histological malignancy indices, such as cell density and MIB-1 labeling, than targets that were based solely on the highest amino acid uptake or contrast enhancement on MRI. The results of our study indicate that a combined PET-MR multimodal imaging approach bears potential benefits in detecting glioma heterogeneity.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain tumor; FET-PET; Glioma; MIB-1; MR-S; Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24629350     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.02.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  13 in total

Review 1.  Hybrid MR-PET in Neuroimaging.

Authors:  S Bisdas; C Lá Fougere; U Ernemann
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.649

Review 2.  Positron emission tomography of high-grade gliomas.

Authors:  Guido Frosina
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-02-20       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Amide proton transfer-weighted magnetic resonance image-guided stereotactic biopsy in patients with newly diagnosed gliomas.

Authors:  Shanshan Jiang; Charles G Eberhart; Yi Zhang; Hye-Young Heo; Zhibo Wen; Lindsay Blair; Huamin Qin; Michael Lim; Alfredo Quinones-Hinojosa; Jon D Weingart; Peter B Barker; Martin G Pomper; John Laterra; Peter C M van Zijl; Jaishri O Blakeley; Jinyuan Zhou
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2017-07-10       Impact factor: 9.162

4.  Non-invasive tumor decoding and phenotyping of cerebral gliomas utilizing multiparametric 18F-FET PET-MRI and MR Fingerprinting.

Authors:  Johannes Haubold; Aydin Demircioglu; Marcel Gratz; Martin Glas; Karsten Wrede; Ulrich Sure; Gerald Antoch; Kathy Keyvani; Mathias Nittka; Stephan Kannengiesser; Vikas Gulani; Mark Griswold; Ken Herrmann; Michael Forsting; Felix Nensa; Lale Umutlu
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2019-12-06       Impact factor: 9.236

5.  MR Fingerprinting of Adult Brain Tumors: Initial Experience.

Authors:  C Badve; A Yu; S Dastmalchian; M Rogers; D Ma; Y Jiang; S Margevicius; S Pahwa; Z Lu; M Schluchter; J Sunshine; M Griswold; A Sloan; V Gulani
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 6.  Chemotherapeutic nanomaterials in tumor boundary delineation: Prospects for effective tumor treatment.

Authors:  Ozioma Udochukwu Akakuru; Zhoujing Zhang; M Zubair Iqbal; Chengjie Zhu; Yewei Zhang; Aiguo Wu
Journal:  Acta Pharm Sin B       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 14.903

7.  Non-Gaussian diffusion MR imaging of glioma: comparisons of multiple diffusion parameters and correlation with histologic grade and MIB-1 (Ki-67 labeling) index.

Authors:  Ren Yan; Pang Haopeng; Feng Xiaoyuan; Wu Jinsong; Zhang Jiawen; Yao Chengjun; Qiu Tianming; Xiong Ji; Sheng Mao; Ding Yueyue; Zhang Yong; Luo Jianfeng; Yao Zhenwei
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 8.  Performance of 18F-FET versus 18F-FDG-PET for the diagnosis and grading of brain tumors: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Vincent Dunet; Anastasia Pomoni; Andreas Hottinger; Marie Nicod-Lalonde; John O Prior
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2015-08-04       Impact factor: 12.300

9.  Correlation of (18)F-fluoroethyl tyrosine positron-emission tomography uptake values and histomorphological findings by stereotactic serial biopsy in newly diagnosed brain tumors using a refined software tool.

Authors:  William Omar Contreras Lopez; Joacir Graciolli Cordeiro; Ulrich Albicker; Soroush Doostkam; Guido Nikkhah; Robert D Kirch; Michael Trippel; Thomas Reithmeier
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2015-12-17       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Phosphorous Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy to Detect Regional Differences of Energy and Membrane Metabolism in Naïve Glioblastoma Multiforme.

Authors:  Lisa Maria Walchhofer; Ruth Steiger; Andreas Rietzler; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Christian Franz Freyschlag; Günther Stockhammer; Elke Ruth Gizewski; Astrid Ellen Grams
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.