| Literature DB >> 31810448 |
Sofia Manousou1, Maja Stål2, Robert Eggertsen3,4, Michael Hoppe2, Lena Hulthén2, Helena Filipsson Nyström1,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Before iodination of Swedish table salt in 1936, iodine deficiency resulting in goitre and hypothyroidism was common. Sweden has become iodine sufficient, as shown in a national survey in 2007, proving its iodination fortification programme effective for the general population. The objective of this study was to collect drinking water from water treatment plants nationally and test if water iodine concentration (WIC) correlated to urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of school-aged children in a national survey 2007 to former goitre frequency in 1929 and to thyroid volume data in 2007.Entities:
Keywords: Goitre; Iodine; Thyroid; UIC; WIC; Water
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31810448 PMCID: PMC6898976 DOI: 10.1186/s12199-019-0821-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Environ Health Prev Med ISSN: 1342-078X Impact factor: 3.674
Fig. 1Level of water iodine concentration (WIC) from water treatment plants in 166 Swedish municipalities
Fig. 2The frequency of goitre in Sweden in 1929. The dark grey shaded areas represent the goitre belt. Circles mark location of 30 randomly selected schools
Median water iodine content (μg/L) in water from coastal and inland, urban and rural, and former goitrous and non-goitrous areas in ground water, surface water, and all water samples from 166 municipality water treatment plants
| All | Ground | Surface | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Median (range) | Median (range) | Median (range) | ||
| All | 166 | 4.0 | 4.0 | 3.5 |
| (0–27) | (0–27) | (0–11) | ||
| Coastal | 56 | 4.1 | 4.0 | 4.5 |
| (0–22) | (0–22) | (0–11) | ||
| Inland | 110 | 3.5 | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| (0–27) | (0–27) | (0–13) | ||
| Urban | 20 | 4.3 | 1.3* | 4.5 |
| (0–11) | (0–11) | (0–9) | ||
| Rural | 146 | 3.8 | 4.0* | 3.0 |
| (0–27) | (0–27) | (0–27) | ||
| Goitrous | 31 | 2.0*** | 2.6** | 1.8*** |
| (0–22) | (0–22) | (0–8) | ||
| Non-goitrous | 52 | 4.3*** | 6.0** | 4.0*** |
| (0–27) | (0–27) | (0–11) |
***p < 0.001, **p < 0.01, *p < 0.05 coastal vs inland, urban vs rural, and giotrous vs non-goitrous
Mean (95% confidence interval) and median (interquartile range) water iodine concentration, WIC (μg/L), and number of water samples
| Mean (95% confidence interval) | Median (interquartile range) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Ground water and surface water, total | 193 | 4.3 (3.8–4.8) | 4.0 (2.0–5.9) |
| Ground water and surface water, coast | 68 | 4.4 (3.5–5.3) | 4.4 (1.4–6.0) |
| Ground water and surface water, inland | 125 | 4.4 (3.8–5.1) | 4.0 (2.0–5.0) |
| Surface water, coast | 35 | 3.9 (3.0–4.9) | 4.5 (1.5–6.0) |
| Groundwater, coast | 33 | 4.9 (3.2–6.6) | 4.0 (1.0–6.0) |
| Surface water, inland | 62 | 3.4 (2.8–4.0) | 3.0 (2.0–4.5) |
| Groundwater, inland | 63 | 5.1 (3.9–6.2) | 4.0 (2.5–6.8) |
| Groundwater and surface water, urban area | 23 | 4.0 (2.8–5.2) | 4.0 (2.0–5.0) |
| Surface water, urban area | 15 | 4.4 (3.2–5.6) | 4.5 (3.0–5.7) |
| Groundwater, urban area | 8 | 2.7 (0.0–5.8) | 1.3 (0.8–2.9) |
| Groundwater and surface water, rural area | 170 | 4.6 (4.0–5.1) | 4.0 (2.0–6.0) |
| Surface water, rural area | 82 | 3.4 (2.9–4.0) | 3.0 (1.5–4.5) |
| Groundwater, rural area | 88 | 5.2 (4.2–6.2) | 4.0 (2.4–7.1) |
| Surface water, total | 97 | 3.6 (3.0–4.1) | 3.5 (1.5–4.5) |
| Groundwater, total | 96 | 5.0 (4.1–5.9) | 4.0 (2.0–6.6) |
Fig. 3Relationship between water iodine concentration (WIC) and frequency of goitre in 1929, > 15% goitre vs non-goitre areas (p = 0.001). ooutlier, i.e. value that is 1.5–3 times the interquartile range (IQR) higher than the third quartile. *extreme value, i.e. value that is more than 3 times the IQR higher than the third quartile
Fig. 4Correlation between median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) from children in each of 30 schools (Fig. 2) and median water iodine concentration (WIC) from (a) water treatment plants in the same Swedish municipalities (p = 0.006) and (b) the tap water in the same schools (NS)