James Heckman1, Kenneth J Mukamal2, Adam Christensen2, Eileen E Reynolds2. 1. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Shapiro Clinical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA. jaheckma@bidmc.harvard.edu. 2. Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, East Campus, Shapiro Clinical Center, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Medical scribes have been proposed as a solution to the problems of excessive documentation, work-life balance, and burnout facing general internists. However, their acceptability to patients and effects on provider experience have not been tested in a real-world model of effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of medical scribes on patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, and provider productivity. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences longitudinal design. PARTICIPANTS: Four attending physicians who worked with scribes, 9 control physicians who did not, and their patients in a large, hospital-affiliated academic general internal medicine practice. MAIN MEASURES: Provider experience and patient experience using 5-point Likert scale surveys from the AMA Steps Forward Team Documentation Module, and visits and wRVUs per hour during 4 weeks before and 12 weeks after initiation of a practice model that included use of scribes and a shortened visit template. KEY RESULTS: Participating providers worked a total of 664 clinic sessions and returned 547 (82%) surveys. Average provider experience scores did not differ between providers working with scribes and control providers working without (4.01 vs. 3.40 respectively; p time-by-group interaction = 0.26). Providers with scribes were more likely to agree that work for the encounter would be completed during the visit then controls (3.58 vs. 2.48 respectively; p interaction = 0.04). A total of 6202 visits occurred during the study period. Average patient experience scores did not differ between the experimental and control groups (4.73 vs. 4.75 respectively; p interaction = 0.90). Compared with the control providers, providers with scribes completed more visits per hour (2.29 vs. 1.91; p interaction < 0.001) and generated more wRVUs per hour (3.42 vs. 3.27; p interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this test of a modified practice model, scribes supported greater patient throughput and improved provider perceptions of documentation burden with no decrement in high patient satisfaction.
BACKGROUND: Medical scribes have been proposed as a solution to the problems of excessive documentation, work-life balance, and burnout facing general internists. However, their acceptability to patients and effects on provider experience have not been tested in a real-world model of effectiveness. OBJECTIVE: To measure the effect of medical scribes on patient satisfaction, provider satisfaction, and provider productivity. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental difference-in-differences longitudinal design. PARTICIPANTS: Four attending physicians who worked with scribes, 9 control physicians who did not, and their patients in a large, hospital-affiliated academic general internal medicine practice. MAIN MEASURES: Provider experience and patient experience using 5-point Likert scale surveys from the AMA Steps Forward Team Documentation Module, and visits and wRVUs per hour during 4 weeks before and 12 weeks after initiation of a practice model that included use of scribes and a shortened visit template. KEY RESULTS: Participating providers worked a total of 664 clinic sessions and returned 547 (82%) surveys. Average provider experience scores did not differ between providers working with scribes and control providers working without (4.01 vs. 3.40 respectively; p time-by-group interaction = 0.26). Providers with scribes were more likely to agree that work for the encounter would be completed during the visit then controls (3.58 vs. 2.48 respectively; p interaction = 0.04). A total of 6202 visits occurred during the study period. Average patient experience scores did not differ between the experimental and control groups (4.73 vs. 4.75 respectively; p interaction = 0.90). Compared with the control providers, providers with scribes completed more visits per hour (2.29 vs. 1.91; p interaction < 0.001) and generated more wRVUs per hour (3.42 vs. 3.27; p interaction < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this test of a modified practice model, scribes supported greater patient throughput and improved provider perceptions of documentation burden with no decrement in high patient satisfaction.
Entities:
Keywords:
burnout; medical scribes; patient satisfaction
Authors: Melinda A Chen; James P Hollenberg; Walid Michelen; Janey C Peterson; Lawrence P Casalino Journal: J Gen Intern Med Date: 2010-09-02 Impact factor: 5.128
Authors: Heather A Heaton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Elliott R Trotter; Patricia J Erwin; M Fernanda Bellolio Journal: Am J Emerg Med Date: 2016-07-28 Impact factor: 2.469
Authors: Stephen T Earls; Judith A Savageau; Susan Begley; Barry G Saver; Kate Sullivan; Alan Chuman Journal: J Fam Pract Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 0.493
Authors: Christine Sinsky; Lacey Colligan; Ling Li; Mirela Prgomet; Sam Reynolds; Lindsey Goeders; Johanna Westbrook; Michael Tutty; George Blike Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2016-09-06 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Anastasia Pozdnyakova Piersa; Neda Laiteerapong; Sandra A Ham; Felipe Fernandez Del Castillo; Sachin Shah; Deborah L Burnet; Wei Wei Lee Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-11 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Joan S Ash; Sky Corby; Vishnu Mohan; Nicholas Solberg; James Becton; Robby Bergstrom; Benjamin Orwoll; Christopher Hoekstra; Jeffrey A Gold Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2021-02-15 Impact factor: 4.497