| Literature DB >> 31807243 |
Abolfazl Dehkohneh1, Parvaneh Jafari2, Hossein Fahimi3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Prevalence of high-fat food consumption, such as fast foods is one of the major causes of hypercholesterolemia, which can lead to cardiovascular diseases. 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) and cytochrome P450 7A1 (CYP7A1) are two key genes in cholesterol metabolism. Use of probiotics in the diet is a promising approach for modulation of serum lipid. To confirm the modulation of serum lipids by probiotics, in this study, we have examined the efficacy of Lactobacillus paracasei TD3 in improving blood cholesterol levels.Entities:
Keywords: 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA Reductase (HMGCR); Cholesterol; Cholesterol 7α-hydroxylase - (CYP7A1); Lactobacillus paracasei; Probiotics; Rat
Year: 2019 PMID: 31807243 PMCID: PMC6880523 DOI: 10.22038/ijbms.2019.33933.8073
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Iran J Basic Med Sci ISSN: 2008-3866 Impact factor: 2.699
Normal and high-fat diet ingredients. The high-fat diet includes all of the normal diet ingredients but the amount of fat is elevated by 20%.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Protein | 23 |
| Salt | 0.55 |
| Lysine | 1.15 |
| Methionine | 0.33 |
| Threonine | 0.72 |
| Tryptophan | 0.25 |
| Calcium | 1 |
| fat (in high-fat diet) | 8 |
List of primers used in this study
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| HMGCR | F: AAGCTGTCATTCCAGCCAAG | 171 |
| CYP7A1 | F: CTGCGTGACGAAATTGACAG | 169 |
| GAPDH | F: TTGTGATGGGTGTGAACCAC | 170 |
| G6PD | F: CTTCCACCAAGCTGATACACAC | 180 |
Figure 1A) Mean concentration of total cholesterol in control and probiotic groups: Group G2 had the highest level among groups due to having a high-fat diet while Group G3T was decreased significantly in comparison with the G2 group due to probiotics consumption; B) Mean concentration of serum triglycerides in control and probiotic groups: There were no significant changes in experimental groups. Although G2 and G3T had different diets, it did not affect the triglyceride levels; C) Mean concentration of HDL in control and probiotic groups: There was no significant difference between the three experimental groups. Thus, the HDL level seems not to be affected by the high-fat diet and consumption of probiotics; D) Mean concentration of LDL in control and probiotic groups: Due to the high-fat diet, the G2 group showed the highest level. Consumption of probiotic decreased the LDL level in G3T
The level of lipid panel parameters. Cholesterol level in G3T group was significantly decreased due to the administration of Lactobacillus paracasei TD3. Other lipid panel parameters had no significant change
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 58.00 ± 1.87 | 65.00 ± 1.3 | 59.60 ± 0.74 | 0.007 (B) |
|
| 103.4 ± 3.86 | 109.4 ± 4.67 | 105.8 ± 1.46 | 0.483 |
|
| 26.60 ± 1.03 | 28.80 ± 0.58 | 27.80 ± 1.35 | 0.5173 |
|
| 8.800 ± 0.66 | 10.00 ± 0.7 | 9.600 ± 0.74 | 0.70 |
|
| 0.1460 ± 0.006 | 0.1640 ± 0.005 | 0.1520 ± 0.004 | 0.1281 |
|
| 0.4520 ± 0.005 | 0.4380 ± 0.015 | 0.4640 ± 0.028 | 0.4455 |
|
| 0.2540 ± 0.015 | 0.2620 ± 0.01 | 0.2580 ± 0.013 | 0.8226 |
Figure 2A) Serum AST levels in control and probiotic groups: Consumption of high-fat food led to elevation of AST level in the G2 group, while it decreased significantly in the G3T group; B) Serum ALT levels in control and probiotic groups: The ALT levels in G2 and G3T groups were increased because of the high-fat diet. However, L. paracasei TD3 caused significant reduction in the ALT level; C) Serum ALP levels in control and probiotic groups: Although the high-fat diet caused ALP elevation in G2 and G3T, there was no significant decrease in G3T group
The levels of Hepatic enzymes, uric acid, and urea in control and probiotic groups. The G2 group had the highest level and the biggest changes in all items. There was a significant decrease in AST and ALT levels in the G3T group. Also, the levels of uric acid and urea in G2 and G3T groups were already the same
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| ||||
|
| 281.4 ± 41.83 | 317.2 ± 32.46 | 243.4 ± 13.27 | 0.0684 |
|
| 65.80 ± 0.8602 | 90.20 ± 4.398 (A) | 76.00 ± 3.271 (A) | 0.0321 |
|
| 544.2 ± 80.70 | 967.2 ± 57.73 (B) | 884.6 ± 60.41 | 0.3518 |
|
| 2.520 ± 0.2396 | 2.960 ± 0.2542 | 2.220 ± 0.2888 | 0.0906 |
|
| 48.80 ± 4.164 | 55.60 ± 3.027 | 55.60 ± 1.965 | 1.0 |
Figure 3Gene expression analysis. The expression of both HMGCR and CYP7A1 genes were significantly decreased in the probiotic-treated group