Glen J Nowak1, Nathaniel J Evans2, Bartosz W Wojdynski3, Sun Joo Grace Ahn2, Maria E Len-Rios2, Karen Carera4, Scott Hale4, Deborah McFalls4. 1. Center for Health and Risk Communications and Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States. Electronic address: gnowak@uga.edu. 2. Center for Health and Risk Communications and Department of Advertising and Public Relations, Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States. 3. Center for Health and Risk Communications and Department of Journalism, Grady College of Journalism and Mass Communication, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, United States. 4. Oak Ridge Associated Universities, 100 Orau Way, Oak Ridge, TN 37830, United States.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Only one-third of adults 18-49 years old in the United States receive a recommendedannual influenza vaccination. This study examined whether supplementing vaccine information statements (VIS) with an immersive virtual reality (VR), short video or electronic pamphlet story designed to convey the community immunity benefits of influenza vaccination would improve influenza vaccine avoidant participants' influenza-related perceptions as well as their influenza vaccination-related beliefs, confidence and intentions. METHOD: A one-way between-subjects experimental design compared the effects of adding a supplemental education experience prior to VIS exposure with flu vaccine avoidant 18-to-49-year-olds. The 171 participants recruited from the community were randomly assigned to one of three modality treatment conditions [VR, video, or e-pamphlet (i.e., story board presented via electronic tablet)] or a VIS-only control condition. RESULTS: Compared to the modalities, the VR intervention created a stronger perception of presence (i.e., feeling of "being there" in the story), which, in turn, increased participants' concern about transmitting influenza to others and raised vaccination intention. Increased concern about transmitting influenza to others was associated with positive effects on influenza vaccination-related beliefs, including confidence that one's flu vaccination would protect others. Neither the e-pamphlet nor the video intervention were able to elicit a sense of presence nor were they able to improve the impact of the VIS on the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR has much potential to increase understanding of key immunization concepts, such as community immunity, through creative executions that increase a sense of presence. Given the need to increase influenza vaccination uptake among 18-to-49-year-olds, and the projected growth in VR accessibility and use, additional applications and assessments related to vaccination communication and education are needed and warranted. By increasing the ability to convey key vaccine and immunization concepts, immersive VR could help address vaccination hesitancy and acceptance challenges.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: Only one-third of adults 18-49 years old in the United States receive a recommended annual influenza vaccination. This study examined whether supplementing vaccine information statements (VIS) with an immersive virtual reality (VR), short video or electronic pamphlet story designed to convey the community immunity benefits of influenza vaccination would improve influenza vaccine avoidant participants' influenza-related perceptions as well as their influenza vaccination-related beliefs, confidence and intentions. METHOD: A one-way between-subjects experimental design compared the effects of adding a supplemental education experience prior to VIS exposure with flu vaccine avoidant 18-to-49-year-olds. The 171 participants recruited from the community were randomly assigned to one of three modality treatment conditions [VR, video, or e-pamphlet (i.e., story board presented via electronic tablet)] or a VIS-only control condition. RESULTS: Compared to the modalities, the VR intervention created a stronger perception of presence (i.e., feeling of "being there" in the story), which, in turn, increased participants' concern about transmitting influenza to others and raised vaccination intention. Increased concern about transmitting influenza to others was associated with positive effects on influenza vaccination-related beliefs, including confidence that one's flu vaccination would protect others. Neither the e-pamphlet nor the video intervention were able to elicit a sense of presence nor were they able to improve the impact of the VIS on the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Immersive VR has much potential to increase understanding of key immunization concepts, such as community immunity, through creative executions that increase a sense of presence. Given the need to increase influenza vaccination uptake among 18-to-49-year-olds, and the projected growth in VR accessibility and use, additional applications and assessments related to vaccination communication and education are needed and warranted. By increasing the ability to convey key vaccine and immunization concepts, immersive VR could help address vaccination hesitancy and acceptance challenges.
Authors: Daniel Adrian Lungu; Jo Røislien; Siri Wiig; Marie Therese Shortt; Francesca Ferrè; Siv Hilde Berg; Henriette Thune; Kolbjørn Kallesten Brønnick Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2021-12-30 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Zi Ying Chang; Gary Chun-Yun Kang; Eileen Yi Ling Koh; Rodney Jin Kai Fong; Jiasheng Tang; Chi Keong Goh; Ngiap Chuan Tan Journal: Front Pediatr Date: 2022-03-25 Impact factor: 3.418
Authors: Hina Hakim; Julie A Bettinger; Christine T Chambers; S Michelle Driedger; Eve Dubé; Teresa Gavaruzzi; Anik M C Giguere; Éric Kavanagh; Julie Leask; Shannon E MacDonald; Rita Orji; Elizabeth Parent; Jean-Sébastien Paquette; Jacynthe Roberge; Beate Sander; Aaron M Scherer; Martin Tremblay-Breault; Kumanan Wilson; Daniel Reinharz; Holly O Witteman Journal: J Med Internet Res Date: 2020-10-30 Impact factor: 5.428