Literature DB >> 31805242

Physiological Correlates of Fluent and Stuttered Speech Production in Preschool Children Who Stutter.

Bridget Walsh1, Evan Usler2.   

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare physiological indices of sympathetic nervous system arousal recorded during fluent and stuttered utterances in a preschool children who stutter (CWS). Method Twenty-two 4- to 5-year-old CWS participated in the experiment. We recorded children's skin conductance response amplitude and frequency, blood pulse volume amplitude, and pulse rate as they completed a picture description task. We then compared indices of phasic sympathetic arousal recorded during stuttered versus fluent utterances. In addition, children's communication attitudes were evaluated with a self-report measure. Results We detected significantly higher sympathetic arousal during stuttered utterances compared to fluent utterances. Specifically, we found larger skin conductance responses occurring at an increased frequency and decreased blood pulse volume amplitudes during stuttered speech. The behavioral measure indicated a negative communication attitude in only one-third of the participants. Conclusion Our findings suggest that preschool CWS may exhibit higher levels of sympathetic arousal during stuttered speech compared to when they are speaking fluently. We discuss the potential impact of increased sympathetic arousal on speech regulatory mechanisms in early childhood stuttering and present questions to guide future research.

Entities:  

Year:  2019        PMID: 31805242      PMCID: PMC7201324          DOI: 10.1044/2019_JSLHR-S-19-0018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res        ISSN: 1092-4388            Impact factor:   2.297


  54 in total

1.  Autonomic correlates of speech versus nonspeech tasks in children and adults.

Authors:  Hayley S Arnold; Megan K MacPherson; Anne Smith
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 2.  Cognitive processing load as a determinant of stuttering: summary of a research programme.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Bosshardt
Journal:  Clin Linguist Phon       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.346

3.  Temperament and Early Stuttering Development: Cross-Sectional Findings From a Community Cohort.

Authors:  Elaina Kefalianos; Mark Onslow; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Susan Block; Sheena Reilly
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Characterization of stress reactions to the Stroop Color Word Test.

Authors:  J H Tulen; P Moleman; H G van Steenis; F Boomsma
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 3.533

5.  Potential interactions among linguistic, autonomic, and motor factors in speech.

Authors:  Jennifer Kleinow; Anne Smith
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.038

6.  Anxiety levels in people who stutter: a randomized population study.

Authors:  Ashley Craig; Karen Hancock; Yvonne Tran; Magali Craig
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Relation of emotional reactivity and regulation to childhood stuttering.

Authors:  Jan Karrass; Tedra A Walden; Edward G Conture; Corrin G Graham; Hayley S Arnold; Kia N Hartfield; Krista A Schwenk
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2006-02-20       Impact factor: 2.288

8.  Social anxiety and the severity and typography of stuttering in adolescents.

Authors:  Kylie Mulcahy; Neville Hennessey; Janet Beilby; Michelle Byrnes
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 2.538

9.  Acoustic Measures of Voice and Physiologic Measures of Autonomic Arousal during Speech as a Function of Cognitive Load.

Authors:  Megan K MacPherson; Defne Abur; Cara E Stepp
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-12-06       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Why I tense up when you watch me: Inferior parietal cortex mediates an audience's influence on motor performance.

Authors:  Michiko Yoshie; Yoko Nagai; Hugo D Critchley; Neil A Harrison
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.