| Literature DB >> 31801550 |
Alessia D'Agostino1, Angelo Gismondi2, Gabriele Di Marco1, Mauro Lo Castro3, Rosaria Olevano3, Tiziano Cinti3, Donatella Leonardi1, Antonella Canini1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The analysis of ancient calcified dental plaque is a powerful archaeobotanical method to elucidate the key role of the plants in human history.Entities:
Keywords: Cereals; Dental calculus; Gas chromatography mass spectrometry; Light microscopy; Non-dietary micro-remains; Passo Corese; Secondary metabolites
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31801550 PMCID: PMC6894264 DOI: 10.1186/s13002-019-0334-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Ethnobiol Ethnomed ISSN: 1746-4269 Impact factor: 2.733
Fig. 1Location of Passo Corese (Fara Sabina, Latium) and inhumation of the burial 26. Map of Italy with the geographical location of the studied site (a and b, image from Google Earth); representative image of human skeletal remains (c) and detail of the relative mandibular dental calculus (d)
Total of starch granules and other micro-remains detected in dental calculus. The amount of each micro-debris identified by microscopic analysis was shown per individual. Morphotype I, starch of Fabaceae; morphotype II, starch of Fagaceae; morphotype III, starch of Poeae; morphotype IV, starch of Paniceae; morphotype V, starch of Triticeae; morphotype VI, starch of Sorghum sp.; indeterminate starch granules; O, Oleaceae pollen grain; H, Hedera pollen grain; C, Castanea pollen grain; J, Juglans regia pollen grain; ND, indeterminate pollen grain; F, plant fiber; DH, Cervidae or Bovidae hair; BH, bee hair; T, peltate trichome; GB, fragment of feather barbule of Galliformes; AB, fragments of feather barbule of Anseriformes. In addition, sex (M: male; F: female) and age at death (in years) of each individual were reported
| Burial | Sex | Age at death | Morphotype I | Morphotype II | Morphotype III | Morphotype IV | Morphotype V | Morphotype VI | Indeterminate | Total starches per sample | Pollen grains | Other micro-remains |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | M | 30–45 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 4 | ||||||
| 2 | M | 30–45 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 3F | |||||
| 3 | M | 30–45 | 3 | 2 | 5 | |||||||
| 4 | F | 16–20 | 1 | 4 | 8 | 13 | ||||||
| 6 | M | 30–45 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1F | ||||||
| 8 | M | 30–40 | 2 | 16 | 1 | 22 | 92 | 3 | 136 | 3F+1DH | ||
| 9 | M | 20–35 | 8 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 26 | ||||
| 10 | M | 35–45 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 2 | 12 | 1O | ||||
| 11 | M | 13–25 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 20 | 33 | ||||
| 12 | F | 24–35 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1BH | ||||||
| 14 | M | 20–30 | 2 | 5 | 20 | 27 | ||||||
| 17 | F | 20–35 | 6 | 2 | 25 | 12 | 45 | |||||
| 21 | F | 35–45 | 1 | 3 | 18 | 22 | ||||||
| 23 | M | 20–35 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 16 | 23 | 2F | ||||
| 24 | F | 20–35 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 | ||||||
| 25 | F | 20–35 | 1 | 31 | 1 | 40 | 73 | |||||
| 26 | M | 20–35 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 29 | ||||
| 27 | M | 16–20 | 2 | 5 | 25 | 10 | 1 | 6 | 49 | 1H | 2 T+1AB | |
| 28 | M | 16–35 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 7 | 1C+1ND | 1GB | |||
| 29 | M | 40–45 | 4 | 4 | ||||||||
| 31 | M | 16–35 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 5 | 22 | 1 J+1ND | 1AB | ||
| 34 | M | ≤ 45 | 1 | 5 | 2 | 8 | ||||||
| 36 | F | 24–35 | 2 | 5 | 7 | |||||||
| 38 | M | ≤ 45 | 1 | 2 | 3 | |||||||
| 39 | M | 20–35 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 2F | ||||||
| 40 | M | 25–35 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |||||||
| 41 | M | 25–35 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
| Total | 11 | 11 | 53 | 43 | 157 | 112 | 184 | 571 | 6 | 18 | ||
Fig. 2Ancient starch granules at optic microscopy. Representative images of starches found in dental calculus samples: aggregate of Sorghum sp. starch grains and relative polarized image (a); starch grain of Fabaceae and relative polarized image (b); aggregates of Triticeae starch grains and relative polarized images (c and d)
Starch morphotypes. Detailed description of the starch morphotypes recovered from the dental calculus of the ancient community
| Morphotype | Morphologic and morphometric description | Taxonomic group |
|---|---|---|
| I | Irregular ovoid to reniform granules; size range. 20–52 μm in length and 17–38 μm in width; clear concentric | Fabaceae |
| II | Pyriform to reniform granules; size range, 19–35 μm in length and 16–27 μm in width; faintly visible | Fagaceae |
| III | Multifaceted polyhedral units on one side and dome shaped on the other one; individual granule size, 5–14 μm in length and 5–12 in width; indistinct | Poeae |
| IV | Polyhedral granules with pentagonal or hexagonal faces and rounded off edges; size range, 3–16 μm in length and 2–15 in width; centric distinct | Paniceae |
| V | Discoidal granules; size range, 6–36 μm in length and 4–30 μm in width; indistinct | Triticeae |
| VI | Ovoidal granules with flattened surfaces; size range, 8–20 μm in length and 7–17 μm in width; indistinct |
Fig. 3Other micro-remains at light microscopy. Representative images of micro-debris found in dental calculus samples: peltate trichome of Olea sp. (a); Hedera pollen grain (b); Juglans regia pollen grain (c); plant fiber and relative polarized image (d); fragment of feather barbule typical of Anseriformes (e); bee hair (f)