| Literature DB >> 31799412 |
Priya M Mathews1, Rajesh Fogla2, Erik Samayoa3, Shanna VanCourt1, Esen K Akpek1.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To report long-term clinical outcomes of gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules in partial and full-thickness keratoplasty. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, retrospective case series includes 23 patients who underwent surgery at three centres (India, Guatemala, and USA) between May 2009 and March 2018. The main outcome measures were epithelialization and retention for therapeutic keratoplasty and best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) for optical keratoplasty.Entities:
Keywords: Cornea; Eye (Tissue) Banking
Year: 2019 PMID: 31799412 PMCID: PMC6861079 DOI: 10.1136/bmjophth-2019-000396
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMJ Open Ophthalmol ISSN: 2397-3269
Figure 1Type of surgery performed using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules categorised by aetiology of corneal disease. This diagram displays the classification of all 23 patients, first by etiology of corneal disease and then by the surgical procedure performed.
Baseline demographics of patients who underwent partial or full-thickness keratoplasty using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules
| Etiology | Patient | Country | Age (years) | Sex | Indication for surgery | Surgery | Duration of follow-up (months) |
| Non-inflammatory corneal conditions | 1 | India | 22 | Male | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 24 |
| 2 | India | 52 | Female | Granular dystrophy | DALK | 12 | |
| 3 | India | 22 | Female | Keratoconus | DALK | 12 | |
| 4 | India | 28 | Female | Keratoconus | DALK | 24 | |
| 5 | India | 33 | Female | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 24 | |
| 6 | India | 24 | Male | Keratoconus | DALK | 12 | |
| 7 | USA | 56 | Female | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | 39 | |
| 8 | USA | 13 | Female | Limbal dermoid | ALK | 12 | |
| 9 | USA | 74 | Female | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | 84 | |
| Infectious keratitis* | 10 | Guatemala | 43 | Female | Presumed infectious keratitis | LPG | 6 |
| 11 | Guatemala | 47 | Male | Presumed infectious keratitis | LPG | 6 | |
| 12 | USA | 65 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis | LPG | 105 | |
| 13 | USA | 65 | Male | Bacterial keratitis | LPG | 5 | |
| 14 | USA | 48 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis | LPG | 30 | |
| 15 | USA | 81 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis | LPG | 6 | |
| 16 | USA | 51 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with bacterial superinfection | LPG | 100 | |
| 17 | USA | 80 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with fungal superinfection | LPG | 91 | |
| 18 | USA | 44 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with bacterial superinfection | LPG | 55 | |
| Inflammatory/autoimmune | 19 | USA | 80 | Female | Systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary Sjögren’s syndrome | LPG | 96 |
| 20 | USA | 81 | Female | Rheumatoid arthritis | LPG | 53 | |
| 21 | USA | 32 | Male | Sterile keratolysis with unknown aetiology | LPG | 36 | |
| 22 | USA | 75 | Female | Sterile keratolysis with unknown aetiology | LPG | 29 | |
| 23 | USA | 13 | Female | Sterile inflammatory corneal lesion with unknown aetiology | LPG | 8 |
*All patients with infectious and inflammatory/autoimmune aetiology had corneal melt, impending perforation, or frank perforation secondary to the pathogen or likely related to the systemic disease indicated (except for patient 26, unknown aetiology).
ALK, anterior lamellar keratoplasty;DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; KPro, Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis; LPG, lamellar patch graft; PK, penetrating keratoplasty.
Clinical outcomes of patients with non-inflammatory conditions undergoing anterior lamellar or full-thickness keratoplasty using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules
| Patient | Indication for surgery | Type of surgery | Preoperative | Last follow-up after surgery | Follow-up duration (months) | Clinical outcome | ||
| UCVA | BSCVA | UCVA | BSCVA | |||||
| 1 | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 20/200 | 20/80 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 2 | Granular dystrophy | DALK | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/200 | 20/60* | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 3 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/240 | 20/60 | 20/40 | 20/20 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 4 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/1200 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/30 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 5 | Macular dystrophy | DALK | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/30 | 20/20 | 24 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 6 | Keratoconus | DALK | 20/1200 | 20/120 | 20/40 | 20/20 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 7 | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | CF | CF | 20/150 | 20/70† | 39 | Initially clear graft and epithelialised, developed infectious endophthalmitis 7 months after surgery. Underwent subsequent tectonic PK which failed within 1 year. |
| 8 | Limbal dermoid | ALK | 20/30 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 20/30 | 12 | Clear graft, epithelialised. |
| 9 | Multiple failed PKs | KPro | CF | 20/200 | 20/30 | 20/30† | 84 | Initially clear graft and epithelialised, developed infectious endophthalmitis 4 months after surgery. Underwent subsequent tectonic PK which failed within 1 month, then repeat KPro which remained intact throughout follow-up. |
*Patient 2 had a recurrent presumed herpetic keratitis at month 6 and noted to have cataract at month 12.
†Visual acuity reported is from the last follow-up visit after surgery but before onset of infection.
ALK, anterior lamellar keratoplasty; BSCVA, best spectacle-corrected visual acuity; CF, count fingers; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; KPro, Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis; PK, penetrating keratoplasty; UCVA, uncorrected visual acuity.
Figure 2Preoperative and postoperative slit-lamp photos of three patients with stromal dystrophies undergoing deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty with gamma-irradiated corneal tissue. Patient 1 (macular dystrophy) before (A) and 1 month after (B) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Patient 2 (granular dystrophy) before (C) and 1 month after (D) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty. Patient 5 (macular dystrophy) before (E) and 1 month after (F) deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
Clinical outcomes of patients with infectious keratitis undergoing lamellar patch graft surgery using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules
| Patient | Age (years) | Sex | Indication for surgery | Histopathology | Duration of follow-up (months) | Clinical outcome |
| 10 | 43 | Female | Presumed infectious keratitis. | Not performed. | 6 | Graft intact, epithelialised, opacified. |
| 11 | 47 | Male | Presumed infectious keratitis. | Not performed. | 6 | Graft intact, epithelialised, opacified. |
| 12 | 65 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis. | Acute inflammation and necrosis. | 105 | Graft intact, epithelialised and remained clear. |
| 13 | 65 | Male | Bacterial keratitis. | Acute inflammatory infiltrate and necrosis. | 5 | Graft intact, epithelialised and opacified. Underwent subsequent optical PK with fresh tissue, which also opacified. |
| 14 | 48 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis. | Acute inflammation and necrosis. | 30 | Graft intact, epithelialised and clear. |
| 15 | 81 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis. | Acute inflammation and necrosis. | 6 | Graft intact, did not epithelialise, developed bacterial ulcer and perforated. Underwent tectonic PK with fresh tissue, then lost to follow-up. |
| 16 | 51 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with bacterial superinfection. | Acute inflammation and necrosis. | 100 | Graft intact, did not epithelialise, developed fungal keratitis. Underwent tectonic PK which failed, and eventually conjunctival flap performed. |
| 17 | 80 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with fungal superinfection. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, fungal elements. | 91 | Graft intact, did not epithelialise and cornea melted. Underwent tectonic PK and KPro—both failed, and eye eventually became phthisical. |
| 18 | 44 | Female | Presumed herpetic keratitis with bacterial superinfection. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, Gram-positive cocci. | 55 | Graft intact, epithelialised and clear, but eventually developed endophthalmitis. Underwent subsequent tectonic PK which failed. |
KPro, Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis; PK, penetrating keratoplasty.
Figure 3Slit-lamp photos of two patients with infectious keratitis undergoing lamellar patch graft surgery using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules. Patient 11 with perforated infectious ulcer before surgery (A) and 1 week after surgery (B). Patient 14 (perforation secondary to Herpes Simplex Virus corneal ulcer) 1 month after surgery (C) and 3 months after surgery (D, E, F).
Clinical outcomes of patients with inflammatory or autoimmune keratitis undergoing lamellar patch graft surgery using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules
| Patient | Age (years) | Sex | Indication for surgery | Histopathology | Duration of follow-up (months) | Clinical outcome |
| 19 | 80 | Female | Systemic lupus erythematosus with secondary Sjögren’s syndrome. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, no e/o infection. | 96 | Never epithelialised, graft melted |
| 20 | 81 | Female | Rheumatoid arthritis. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, no e/o infection. | 53 | Graft intact and epithelialised, but developed other intraocular complications due to retinal surgery. Eventually eye became phthisical. |
| 21 | 32 | Male | Sterile keratolysis with unknown aetiology. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, no e/o infection. | 36 | Graft initially intact with under Gunderson conjunctival flap done simultaneously, then melted within 3 months. Underwent KPro implantation which failed. Eventually cornea scarred and KPro left in place. |
| 22 | 75 | Female | Sterile keratolysis with unknown aetiology. | Acute inflammation and necrosis, no e/o infection. | 29 | Graft intact, epithelialised and remained clear. |
| 23 | 13 | Female | Sterile inflammatory corneal lesion with unknown aetiology. | Stromal lymphoplasmacytic inflammation with granulomatous features. | 8 | Graft intact, epithelialised and remained clear. |
e/o, evidence of; KPro, Boston type 1 keratoprosthesis; PK, penetrating keratoplasty.
Figure 4Slit-lamp photos of two patients with autoimmune/inflammatory keratitis undergoing lamellar patch graft surgery using gamma-irradiated corneal lenticules. Patient 21 before surgery (A) and 1 month after anterior lamellar keratoplasty done with conjunctival flap (B). Patient 23 before surgery (C) and 1 month after anterior lamellar keratoplasty (D).