PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility and allogenicity of gamma-irradiated corneal allografts. METHODS: Corneal buttons were harvested from C57BL/6 mice and decellularized with gamma irradiation. Cell viability was assessed using TUNEL and viability/cytotoxicity assays. Orthotopic penetrating keratoplasty was performed using irradiated or nonirradiated (freshly excised) C57BL/6 donor grafts and BALB/c or C57BL/6 recipients. Graft opacity was assessed over an 8-week period and graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Mixed-lymphocyte reactions and delayed-type hypersensitivity assays were performed to evaluate T-cell alloreactivity. Real-time PCR was used to investigate the corneal expression of potentially pathogenic T-helper 1, 2, and 17 cell-associated cytokines. RESULTS: Corneal cells were devitalized by gamma irradiation as evidenced by widespread cellular apoptosis and plasma membrane disruption. Nonirradiated allograft and isograft rates of survival were superior to irradiated allograft and isograft rates of survival (P < 0.001). Mixed lymphocyte reactions demonstrated that T-cells from irradiated allograft recipients did not exhibit a secondary alloimmune response (P < 0.001). Delayed-type hypersensitivity assays demonstrated that irradiated allografts did not elicit an alloreactive delayed-type hypersensitivity response in graft recipients (P ≤ 0.01). The corneal expression of T-helper 1, 2, and 17 cell-associated cytokines was significantly lower in failed irradiated allografts than rejected nonirradiated allografts (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gamma-irradiated corneas failed to remain optically clear following murine penetrating keratoplasty; however, gamma irradiation reduced the allogenicity of these corneas, potentially supporting their use in procedures such as anterior lamellar keratoplasty or keratoprosthesis implantation.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the utility and allogenicity of gamma-irradiated corneal allografts. METHODS: Corneal buttons were harvested from C57BL/6 mice and decellularized with gamma irradiation. Cell viability was assessed using TUNEL and viability/cytotoxicity assays. Orthotopic penetrating keratoplasty was performed using irradiated or nonirradiated (freshly excised) C57BL/6 donor grafts and BALB/c or C57BL/6 recipients. Graft opacity was assessed over an 8-week period and graft survival was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Mixed-lymphocyte reactions and delayed-type hypersensitivity assays were performed to evaluate T-cell alloreactivity. Real-time PCR was used to investigate the corneal expression of potentially pathogenic T-helper 1, 2, and 17 cell-associated cytokines. RESULTS: Corneal cells were devitalized by gamma irradiation as evidenced by widespread cellular apoptosis and plasma membrane disruption. Nonirradiated allograft and isograft rates of survival were superior to irradiated allograft and isograft rates of survival (P < 0.001). Mixed lymphocyte reactions demonstrated that T-cells from irradiated allograft recipients did not exhibit a secondary alloimmune response (P < 0.001). Delayed-type hypersensitivity assays demonstrated that irradiated allografts did not elicit an alloreactive delayed-type hypersensitivity response in graft recipients (P ≤ 0.01). The corneal expression of T-helper 1, 2, and 17 cell-associated cytokines was significantly lower in failed irradiated allografts than rejected nonirradiated allografts (P ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Gamma-irradiated corneas failed to remain optically clear following murine penetrating keratoplasty; however, gamma irradiation reduced the allogenicity of these corneas, potentially supporting their use in procedures such as anterior lamellar keratoplasty or keratoprosthesis implantation.
Authors: Daniel R Saban; Ian A Elder; Cuong Q Nguyen; W Clay Smith; Adrian M Timmers; Maria B Grant; Ammon B Peck Journal: Mol Vis Date: 2008-03-26 Impact factor: 2.367
Authors: Mohammad Mirazul Islam; Roholah Sharifi; Shamina Mamodaly; Rakibul Islam; Daniel Nahra; Dina B Abusamra; Pui Chuen Hui; Yashar Adibnia; Mehdi Goulamaly; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Andrea Cruzat; Jing Kong; Per H Nilsson; Pablo Argüeso; Tom Eirik Mollnes; James Chodosh; Claes H Dohlman; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2019-07-05 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Q Pan; H D Jampel; P Ramulu; G F Schwartz; F Cotter; D Cute; Y J Daoud; P Murakami; W J Stark Journal: Eye (Lond) Date: 2016-11-11 Impact factor: 3.775
Authors: Alja Crnej; Masahiro Omoto; Thomas H Dohlman; Claes H Dohlman; Reza Dana Journal: Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.799
Authors: Martina Nemcokova; Jakub Dite; Yun Min Klimesova; Magdalena Netukova; Pavel Studeny Journal: Cell Tissue Bank Date: 2022-02-06 Impact factor: 1.522
Authors: Sina Sharifi; Hannah Sharifi; Ali Akbari; Fengyang Lei; Claes H Dohlman; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; Curtis Guild; Eleftherios I Paschalis; James Chodosh Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2021-10-28 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Samer N Arafat; Marie-Claude Robert; Anita N Shukla; Claes H Dohlman; James Chodosh; Joseph B Ciolino Journal: Cornea Date: 2014-09 Impact factor: 2.651
Authors: Sina Sharifi; Hannah Sharifi; Curtis Guild; Mohammad Mirazul Islam; Khoa D Tran; Corrina Patzer; Claes H Dohlman; Eleftherios I Paschalis; Miguel Gonzalez-Andrades; James Chodosh Journal: Ocul Surf Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.033