Literature DB >> 31797033

Females are more proactive, males are more reactive: neural basis of the gender-related speed/accuracy trade-off in visuo-motor tasks.

V Bianco1, M Berchicci2, F Quinzi2,3, R L Perri2,4, D Spinelli2, F Di Russo2.   

Abstract

In the present study, we investigated neural correlates associated with gender differences in a simple response task (SRT) and in a discriminative response task (DRT) by means of event-related potential (ERP) technique. 120 adults participated in the study, and, based on their sex, were divided into two groups matched for age and education level. Behavioral performance was assessed with computing response speed, accuracy rates and response consistency. Pre- and post-stimulus ERPs were analyzed and compared between groups. Results indicated that males were faster than females in all tasks, while females were more accurate and consistent than males in the more complex tasks. This different behavioral performance was associated with distinctive ERP features. In the preparation phase, males showed smaller prefrontal negativity (pN) and visual negativity (vN), interpreted as reduced cognitive preparation to stimulus occurrence and reduced reliance on sensory proactive readiness, respectively. In the post-stimulus phase, gender differences were present over occipital (P1, N1, P2 components) and prefrontal (pN1, pP1, pP2 components) areas, suggesting allocation of attentional resources at distinct stages of information processing in the two groups. Overall, the present data provide evidence in favor of a more proactive and cautious cognitive processing in females and a more reactive and fast cognitive processing in males. In addition, we confirm that (1) gender is an important variable to be considered in ERP studies on perceptual processing and decision making, and (2) the pre-stimulus component analysis can provide useful information concerning neural correlates of upcoming performance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Decision making; Gender differences; Motor behavior; Predictive brain; Proactive control; Speed–accuracy trade-off

Year:  2019        PMID: 31797033     DOI: 10.1007/s00429-019-01998-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Struct Funct        ISSN: 1863-2653            Impact factor:   3.270


  5 in total

1.  Sustained visuospatial attention enhances lateralized anticipatory ERP activity in sensory areas.

Authors:  Francesco Di Russo; Marika Berchicci; Valentina Bianco; Elena Mussini; Rinaldo Livio Perri; Sabrina Pitzalis; Federico Quinzi; Sara Tranquilli; Donatella Spinelli
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 3.270

2.  Effect of Relationship Status on Response Times to Sexual and Romantic Stimuli Among Japanese Undergraduates in a Memory Task.

Authors:  Tsukasa Kato
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2021-10-20

3.  Eye-Movements During Navigation in a Virtual Environment: Sex Differences and Relationship to Sex Hormones.

Authors:  TiAnni Harris; Johanna Hagg; Belinda Pletzer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 5.152

4.  Inter- and intra-individual coupling between pupillary, electrophysiological, and behavioral responses in a visual oddball task.

Authors:  Sara LoTemplio; Jack Silcox; Kara D Federmeier; Brennan R Payne
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2020-12-21       Impact factor: 4.348

5.  Effects of a Cognitive-Motor Training on Anticipatory Brain Functions and Sport Performance in Semi-Elite Basketball Players.

Authors:  Stefania Lucia; Valentina Bianco; Luca Boccacci; Francesco Di Russo
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2021-12-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.