Literature DB >> 34671874

Effect of Relationship Status on Response Times to Sexual and Romantic Stimuli Among Japanese Undergraduates in a Memory Task.

Tsukasa Kato1.   

Abstract

This study examined the effects of relationship status on response times to sexual and romantic stimuli during a memory task, which has not been studied before. Based on previous studies on sexual attitudes and behaviors, we hypothesized that response times to sexual stimuli would be faster in individuals who were in a relationship, compared to those who were not. We also hypothesized that the response times to sexual stimuli of individuals who were not in a relationship would be slower than their response time to romantic stimuli. A total of 348 college students memorized 27 sexual, romantic, and neutral sentences and were later asked to recognize them. The students' response times to each sentence were recorded. The results of a 2 (gender) × 2 (stimulus type) × 2 (relationship status) ANOVA showed that response times to sexual sentences were faster in participants who were in a relationship, compared to those who were not. Furthermore, participants who were not in a relationship responded more slowly to sexual than to romantic sentences. Thus, our hypotheses were supported. Individuals' relationship status influenced their response times to sexual and romantic stimuli even after controlling for the effects of gender.
© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Asian; Gender difference; Gender similarity; Memory; Sexuality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34671874     DOI: 10.1007/s10508-021-02149-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Sex Behav        ISSN: 0004-0002


  29 in total

1.  Imaging gender differences in sexual arousal.

Authors:  Turhan Canli; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Differences in sexual guilt and desire in east Asian and Euro-Canadian men.

Authors:  Lori A Brotto; Jane S T Woo; Boris B Gorzalka
Journal:  J Sex Res       Date:  2011-10-17

Review 3.  Gender differences in erotic plasticity: the female sex drive as socially flexible and responsive.

Authors:  R F Baumeister
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Multifaceted Sexual Desire and Hormonal Associations: Accounting for Social Location, Relationship Status, and Desire Target.

Authors:  Sara B Chadwick; Shannon M Burke; Katherine L Goldey; Sari M van Anders
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-04-25

5.  What did you do yesterday? A meta-analysis of sex differences in episodic memory.

Authors:  Martin Asperholm; Nadja Högman; Jonas Rafi; Agneta Herlitz
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 17.737

6.  Females are more proactive, males are more reactive: neural basis of the gender-related speed/accuracy trade-off in visuo-motor tasks.

Authors:  V Bianco; M Berchicci; F Quinzi; R L Perri; D Spinelli; F Di Russo
Journal:  Brain Struct Funct       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.270

Review 7.  The Specificity of Women's Sexual Response and Its Relationship with Sexual Orientations: A Review and Ten Hypotheses.

Authors:  Meredith L Chivers
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2017-01-10

8.  Sex of experimenter and social norm effects on reports of sexual behavior in young men and women.

Authors:  Terri D Fisher
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2007-02

Review 9.  What does sexual orientation orient? A biobehavioral model distinguishing romantic love and sexual desire.

Authors:  Lisa M Diamond
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Dual Control Model in a Cross-Cultural Context: Role of Sexual Excitation in Sexual Response and Behavior Differences Between Chinese and Euro-Caucasian Women in Canada.

Authors:  Silvain S Dang; Boris B Gorzalka; Lori A Brotto
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2019-09-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.