Literature DB >> 31796233

High Failure Rates for Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty in Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study.

John F Nettrour1, Robert T Ellis1, Benjamin J Hansen1, James A Keeney1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several recent studies have recommended offering unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) to all patients regardless of body mass index (BMI). The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the proposition that UKA can indeed be offered to the morbidly-obese and super-obese (morbidly-obese, BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) without compromising results or survivorship.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed mobile-bearing medial UKA procedures performed at our facility from January 2012 to May 2015 with a minimum of 2-year follow-up. The study cohort was divided into patients with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2) and those without morbid obesity (BMI < 40 kg/m2). A detailed medical record review was performed. Extracted outcome data included the frequency of (1) major revision procedures (components revised), (2) minor secondary procedures (components not revised), (3) infection procedures, and (4) recommendations for revision.
RESULTS: We found 152 patients (190 knees) who met criteria for inclusion. Mean follow-up duration was 3.4 years (range: 2.0-6.8 years). Major revision surgery occurred more frequently in the morbid-obesity UKA group (15.7% vs 3.0%, P < .01). Rates of minor secondary surgery and infection were comparable for both groups. Most failures in the morbid-obesity UKA group (85.7%) were due to disease progression involving other compartments or mobile-bearing instability.
CONCLUSION: We found the rate of early major revision surgery in morbidly-obese patients undergoing UKA to be over 5-times greater than that of other patients. Failure was predominantly due to disease progression in other compartments or mobile-bearing instability. Further study is warranted and needed before expanding UKA indications to the morbidly-obese population.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  clinical failure; mobile-bearing; obesity; revision surgery; tibia fracture; unicompartmental arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31796233     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  12 in total

1.  The effect of body mass index on the outcomes of cementless medial mobile-bearing unicompartmental knee replacements.

Authors:  Hasan Raza Mohammad; Stephen Mellon; Andrew Judge; Christopher Dodd; David Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-17       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 2.  Treatment patterns and failure rates associated with prosthetic joint infection in unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.

Authors:  Joseph P Barbera; Ryan C Xiao; Christine S Williams; Jashvant Poeran; Calin S Moucha; Darwin D Chen; Brett L Hayden
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2022-09-14

3.  Deformation of the Titanium Plate Stabilizing the Lateral Ankle Fracture Due to Its Overloading in Case of the Young, Obese Patient: Case Report Including the Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Grzegorz Szczęsny; Mateusz Kopec; Tomasz Szolc; Zbigniew L Kowalewski; Paweł Małdyk
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-16

4.  St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.

Authors:  Andrew J Porteous; James R A Smith; Rachel Bray; James R Robinson; Paul White; James R D Murray
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  The Influence of Obesity on Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Hannah Jia Hui Ng; Wei Jie Loke; Wee Liang Hao James
Journal:  Arch Bone Jt Surg       Date:  2021-11

6.  CORR Insights®: Valgus Correctability and Meniscal Extrusion Were Associated With Alignment After Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Matthew S Hepinstall
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 4.755

7.  Bearing failure in a mobile bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an uncommon presentation of an implant-specific complication.

Authors:  Sravya P Vajapey; Paul M Alvarez; Douglas Chonko
Journal:  Arthroplasty       Date:  2021-06-02

8.  Obesity does not adversely impact the outcome of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis: a meta-analysis of 80,798 subjects.

Authors:  Nikhil Agarwal; Kendrick To; Bridget Zhang; Wasim Khan
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2020-11-19       Impact factor: 5.095

9.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Not Associated With Increased Revision Rates in Obese Patients.

Authors:  Kevin F Purcell; Benjamin M Stronach; Marie Gene Almand; Doug Parsell; Trevor Pickering; R Kerk Mehrle; Craig Winkler; Jeff D Almand
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-06-23

10.  Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With a Lower Rate of Periprosthetic Joint Infection Compared to Total Knee Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Cody S Lee; Edwin P Su; Michael B Cross; Alberto V Carli; David C Landy; Brian P Chalmers
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2021-07-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.