Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a rare but challenging complication. A paucity of literature exists regarding the management of PJI in UKA. This systematic review aims to assess current treatment patterns in UKA PJI and analyze the failure rates associated with treatment. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies that presented cases of PJI following UKA. Data regarding study design, country of publication, index procedure type, diagnosis of PJI, number and incidence of PJI, timing of PJI (acute versus chronic), treatment, and outcomes were recorded. Failure rates in acute and chronic PJI as well as total failure rates were analyzed. Results: Sixteen articles were identified that met inclusion criteria. These included 97 PJI cases (37 acute, 58 chronic, 2 unknown timing); incidence across all studies of 0.80%. The most common treatment for all PJI cases was debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) (40.2%), followed by two-stage conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (33.0%), one-stage conversion to TKA (23.7%), and one-stage exchange UKA (3.1%). There were no significant differences in failure rates across procedures for acute, chronic or overall PJI management (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: This systematic review found relatively few studies reporting on PJI after UKA compared to the available TKA evidence. Further research is warranted to better elucidate the most appropriate treatment of PJI after UKA in both the acute and chronic setting along with risk factors for failure.
Background: Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) following unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) is a rare but challenging complication. A paucity of literature exists regarding the management of PJI in UKA. This systematic review aims to assess current treatment patterns in UKA PJI and analyze the failure rates associated with treatment. Methods: PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE were systematically searched for studies that presented cases of PJI following UKA. Data regarding study design, country of publication, index procedure type, diagnosis of PJI, number and incidence of PJI, timing of PJI (acute versus chronic), treatment, and outcomes were recorded. Failure rates in acute and chronic PJI as well as total failure rates were analyzed. Results: Sixteen articles were identified that met inclusion criteria. These included 97 PJI cases (37 acute, 58 chronic, 2 unknown timing); incidence across all studies of 0.80%. The most common treatment for all PJI cases was debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) (40.2%), followed by two-stage conversion to total knee arthroplasty (TKA) (33.0%), one-stage conversion to TKA (23.7%), and one-stage exchange UKA (3.1%). There were no significant differences in failure rates across procedures for acute, chronic or overall PJI management (p > 0.05 for all). Conclusion: This systematic review found relatively few studies reporting on PJI after UKA compared to the available TKA evidence. Further research is warranted to better elucidate the most appropriate treatment of PJI after UKA in both the acute and chronic setting along with risk factors for failure.
Authors: Julia Herkenhoff Carijo; Paul M Courtney; Karan Goswami; Hannah Groff; Daniel Kendoff; Juliana Matos; Nemandra A Sandiford; Henk Scheper; Carolina Arana Stanis Schmaltz; Igor Shubnyakov; Timothy L Tan; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-10-19 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Brian P Chalmers; Milan Kapadia; Yu-Fen Chiu; Michael W Henry; Andy O Miller; Alberto V Carli Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2020-02-21 Impact factor: 4.757
Authors: Michael P Bolognesi; Melissa A Greiner; David E Attarian; Tyler Steven Watters; Samuel S Wellman; Lesley H Curtis; Keith R Berend; Soko Setoguchi Journal: J Bone Joint Surg Am Date: 2013-11-20 Impact factor: 5.284
Authors: Claudia A M Löwik; Paul C Jutte; Eduard Tornero; Joris J W Ploegmakers; Bas A S Knobben; Astrid J de Vries; Wierd P Zijlstra; Baukje Dijkstra; Alex Soriano; Marjan Wouthuyzen-Bakker Journal: J Arthroplasty Date: 2018-03-27 Impact factor: 4.757