Literature DB >> 33502571

St Georg Sled medial unicompartmental arthroplasty: survivorship analysis and function at 20 years follow up.

Andrew J Porteous1, James R A Smith2, Rachel Bray1, James R Robinson1, Paul White3, James R D Murray1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The peri-operative and short-term benefits of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) are well supported in the literature. However, there remains concern regarding the higher revision rate when compared with total knee replacement. This manuscript reports the functional outcome and survivorship of a large series of fixed bearing, medial unicompartmental replacements (St Georg Sled), with a minimum of 20 years follow-up.
METHODS: Between 1974 and 1994, 399 patients (496 knees) underwent a medial fixed-bearing UKA. Prospective data were collected pre-operatively and at regular intervals post-operatively using the Bristol Knee Score (BKS), Oxford Knee (OKS) and Western Ontario MacMaster (WOMAC) scores. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to determine survivorship, with revision or need for revision as end point, and differences assessed using Mantel-Cox log rank test.
RESULTS: Functional knee scores improved post-operatively, but demonstrated a slight decline from 10 years of follow-up onwards. Survivorship is estimated as 86% at 10 years, 80% at 15 years, and 78% at 20 years. Sixty knees were revised, with progression of disease in another compartment the commonest reason. Eighty eight percent were revised using a primary prosthesis. For patients over the age of 65 years at the time of index procedure, 93% died with a functioning prosthesis in situ.
CONCLUSION: Medial UKA demonstrates good long-term function and survivorship, and represents an excellent surgical option for patients aged over 65 years of age, where few patients will require a revision procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.
© 2021. Crown.

Entities:  

Keywords:  All polyethylene; Fixed bearing; Medial; Outcome; St Georg sled; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33502571     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06454-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  40 in total

1.  Knee scores in a 'normal' elderly population.

Authors:  A T Bremner-Smith; P Ewings; A E Weale
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.199

2.  Comparison of a mobile with a fixed tibial bearing unicompartimental knee prosthesis: a prospective randomized trial using a dedicated outcome score.

Authors:  N Confalonieri; A Manzotti; C Pullen
Journal:  Knee       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.199

3.  St. Georg sledge for medial compartment knee replacement. 461 arthroplasties followed for 4 (1-17) years.

Authors:  S Ansari; J H Newman; C E Ackroyd
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1997-10

4.  Medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: does tibial component position influence clinical outcomes and arthroplasty survival?

Authors:  R Chatellard; V Sauleau; M Colmar; H Robert; G Raynaud; J Brilhault
Journal:  Orthop Traumatol Surg Res       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.256

5.  Good survivorship of all-polyethylene tibial component UKA at long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Danilo Bruni; Michele Gagliardi; Ibrahim Akkawi; Giovanni Francesco Raspugli; Simone Bignozzi; Tedi Marko; Laura Bragonzoni; Alberto Grassi; Maurilio Marcacci
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-09       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Eight Hundred Twenty-Five Medial Mobile-Bearing Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: The First 10-Year US Multi-Center Survival Analysis.

Authors:  Omar K Alnachoukati; John W Barrington; Keith R Berend; Michael C Kolczun; Roger H Emerson; Adolph V Lombardi; David R Mauerhan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2017-10-16       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Higher revision risk for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty in low-volume hospitals.

Authors:  Mona Badawy; Birgitte Espehaug; Kari Indrekvam; Leif I Havelin; Ove Furnes
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Cost-effectiveness of unicompartmental compared with total knee replacement: a population-based study using data from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.

Authors:  Edward Burn; Alexander D Liddle; Thomas W Hamilton; Andrew Judge; Hemant G Pandit; David W Murray; Rafael Pinedo-Villanueva
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-04-29       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  The clinical and cost-effectiveness of total versus partial knee replacement in patients with medial compartment osteoarthritis (TOPKAT): 5-year outcomes of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  David J Beard; Loretta J Davies; Jonathan A Cook; Graeme MacLennan; Andrew Price; Seamus Kent; Jemma Hudson; Andrew Carr; Jose Leal; Helen Campbell; Ray Fitzpatrick; Nigel Arden; David Murray; Marion K Campbell
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2019-07-17       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  A quantitative assessment of degenerative changes acceptable in the unoperated compartments of knees undergoing unicompartmental replacement.

Authors:  R S Corpe; G A Engh
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  1990-03       Impact factor: 1.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.