| Literature DB >> 31795101 |
Daniel Insuasty1, Oscar Vidal1, Anthony Bernal1, Edgar Marquez1, Juan Guzman2, Braulio Insuasty3, Jairo Quiroga3, Laura Svetaz4, Susana Zacchino4, Gloria Puerto5, Rodrigo Abonia3.
Abstract
Eight quinoline-based hydroxyimidazolium hybrids 7a-h were prepared and evaluated in vitro against a panel of clinically important fungal and bacterial pathogens, including mycobacteria. Hybrid compounds 7c-d showed remarkable antifungal activity against Cryptococcus neoformans with a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) value of 15.6 µg/mL. Against other opportunistic fungi such as Candida spp. and Aspergillus spp., these hybrids showed MIC values of 62.5 µg/mL. Regarding their antibacterial activity, all the synthetic hybrids demonstrated little inhibition of Gram-negative bacteria (MIC ≥50 µg/mL), however, hybrid 7b displayed >50% inhibition against Klebsiella pneumoniae at 20 µg/mL and full inhibition at 50 µg/mL. Moreover, this hybrid was shown to be a potent anti-staphylococcal molecule, with a MIC value of 2 µg/mL (5 µM). In addition, hybrid 7h also demonstrated inhibition of Staphylococcus aureus at 20 µg/mL (47 µM). Hybrids 7a and 7b were the most potent against Mycobacterium tuberculosis H37Rv with MIC values of 20 and 10 µg/mL (46 and 24 µM), respectively. The 7b hybrid demonstrated high selectivity in killing S. aureus and M. tuberculosis H37Rv in comparison with mammalian cells (SI >20), and thus it can be considered a hit molecule for mechanism of action studies and the exploration of related chemical space.Entities:
Keywords: antifungal activity; antimicrobial activity; cytotoxicity; quinoline-based hydroxyimidazolium hybrids; tuberculosis
Year: 2019 PMID: 31795101 PMCID: PMC6963836 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics8040239
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Antibiotics (Basel) ISSN: 2079-6382
Figure 1Some examples of biologically important quinoline- and imidazolium-derivatives.
Figure 2Synthesis of quinoline-based hydroxyimidazolium hybrids 7a–h.
Minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC in µg/mL) of hybrids 7a–h.
| Structure | Hybrid | R1 | R2 | R3 | R4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| OMe | H | H | - | 125 | 62.5 | i | i | i |
|
| Me | H | H | - | 62.5 | 62.5 | i | i | i | |
|
| H | H | Me | - | 62.5 | 15.6 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 62.5 | |
|
| H | Cl | H | - | 62.5 | 15.6 | 62.5 | 62.5 | 62.5 | |
|
|
| OMe | H | H | Bu | i | 250 | i | i | i |
|
| Me | H | H | Bu | 250 | 125 | i | i | i | |
|
| H | Cl | H | Bu | 250 | 62.5 | i | i | i | |
|
| H | H | H | Bn | i | 250 | 250 | 250 | 250 | |
|
| 0.78 | 0.25 | 0.50 | 0.50 | 0.50 | |||||
Antifungal activity was determined with the microbroth dilution assay following the clinical laboratory standards institute (CLSI) guidelines; inactive (i) = MIC >250 µg/mL; Ca: Candida albicans ATCC10231, Cn: Cryptococcus neoformans ATCC32264, An: Aspergillus niger ATCC9029, Afl: Aspergillus flavus ATCC9170, Afu: Aspergillus fumigatus ATCC26934. AmpB: Amphotericin B; Bu = Butyl; Bn: benzyl.
Percentages of inhibition of C. neoformans ATCC 32264 by hybrids 7a–h.
| Comp. | Concentration in µg/mL | MIC in µg/mL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 250 | 125 | 62.50 | 31.25 | 15.62 | 7.81 | 3.90 | ||
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 43.6 ± 3.86 | 18.60 ± 8.59 | 4.72 ± 1.39 | 0 | 62.5 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 92.58 ± 4.81 | 67.84 ± 5.66 | 57.14 ± 4.93 | 12.54 ± 0.36 | 31.25 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 53.45 ± 4.42 | 48.41 ± 4.63 | 15.62 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 67.59 ± 9.19 | 0 | 15.62 |
|
| 100 | 62.46 ± 0.30 | 41.46 ± 0.58 | 38.79 ± 3.79 | 29.92 ± 6.13 | 17.19 ± 0.91 | 8.23 ± 3.18 | 250 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 49.28 ± 3.20 | 24.91 ± 0.15 | 19.01 ± 3.40 | 9.34 ± 2.90 | 0 | 62.5 |
|
| 100 | 94.15 ± 4.15 | 90.90 ± 7.60 | 50.44 ± 2.09 | 30.94 ± 5.61 | 25.50 ± 5.35 | 0 | 250 |
|
| 100 | 76.77 ± 1.91 | 48.99 ± 3.00 | 46.84 ±5.32 | 35.32 ± 2.02 | 22.76 ± 2.87 | 2.52 ± 0.56 | 250 |
|
| 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 0.25 |
Figure 3Dose–response curves of hybrids 7a–d (left) y 7e–h (right) against C. neoformans ATCC 32264.
Minimum inhibitory concentration values against E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG for the synthetic hybrids 7a–h.
| Hybrid | MICs in µg/mL (µM) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 100 (231) | 100 (231) | 100 (231) | 50 (115) | 20 (46) |
|
| 200 (480) | 50 (120) | 2 (5) | 50 (120) | 10 (24) |
|
| 200 (480) | 200 (480) | 100 (240) | 200 (480) | 200 (480) |
|
| 100 (229) | 200 (457) | 100 (229) | 50 (114) | 50 (114) |
|
| 200 (462) | 100 (231) | 100 (231) | 50 (115) | 50 (115) |
|
| 200 (478) | 200 (478) | 200 (478) | 200 (478) | 100 (239) |
|
| 200 (228) | 100 (114) | 100 (114) | 100 (228) | 100 (228) |
|
| 100 (228) | 100 (228) | 20 (47) | 50 (114) | 50 (114) |
|
| 20 (62) | 20 (62) | 20 (62) | nd | nd |
|
| nd | nd | nd | 0.05 (0.36) | 0.05 (0.36) |
nd = not determined.
Figure 4Antibacterial activity of hybrids 7a–h. Comparative dose–response curves of hybrids 7a–h against (a) E. coli, (b) K. pneumoniae, and (c) S. aureus. (d) Comparison of the concentrations required for anti-mycobacterial and cytotoxic effects against M. tuberculosis H37Rv, M. bovis BCG, and (Verda Reno) VERO cell line.
Cytotoxic activity (LC50) in VERO cells and selectivity index (SI) of the active synthetic hybrids 7a–h, for E. coli, K. pneumoniae, S. aureus, M. tuberculosis H37Rv and M. bovis BCG.
| Hybrid | Selectivity Index (SI) (SI = LC50/MIC) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
| |||
|
| 277 ± 14.6 | 2.77 | 2.77 | 2.77 | 5.54 | 13.9 |
|
| 234 ± 4 | 1.17 | 4.68 | 117 | 4.68 | 23.4 |
|
| 268 ± 5.69 | 1.34 | 1.34 | 2.68 | 1.34 | 1.34 |
|
| 189 ± 14.5 | 1.89 | 0.94 | 1.89 | 3.78 | 3.78 |
|
| 125 ± 22 | 0.62 | 1.25 | 1.25 | 2.5 | 2.50 |
|
| 150 ± 12.2 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 0.75 | 1.50 |
|
| 144 ± 8.9 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.44 | 1.44 |
|
| 235 ± 6.5 | 2.35 | 2.35 | 11.8 | 4.70 | 4.70 |