| Literature DB >> 31791383 |
Borys Frankewycz1,2, Daniel Cimino3, Nelly Andarawis-Puri4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tendon injuries are common musculoskeletal injuries that heal with scar tissue formation, often achieving reduced biomechanical and functional properties. The murine patellar tendon is a research tool that holds potential for investigating tendon healing and can be useful for exploring therapeutic strategies. Since healing is a complex process that results from the collaboration between the systemic and local tissue environment, a murine tendon transplantation model that can be applied to transgenic mice and genetic mutants would allow isolation of systemic versus local tendon factors in driving effective tendon healing. Preliminary studies have shown that transplantation with simple tendon sutures results in a proximalization of the patellar bone due to the involuntary quadriceps muscle force leading to tearing of the graft and failure of the knee extensor mechanism. To avoid this elongation of the graft, two cerclage techniques for murine patellar tendon transplantation were introduced and validated.Entities:
Keywords: Murine patellar tendon; Patellar tendon transplantation; Tendon regeneration
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31791383 PMCID: PMC6889740 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-019-1475-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Fig. 1a Animal position during surgery: to standardize the knee position during the surgery, mice were placed on a custom made fixture (Plaster of Paris) with a pre-shaped body groove and a support rim for the right knee. Both ankle and groin were strapped down with 0.6 mm cords (green) to align the thigh and calf into the support rim (blue), creating a 90° knee angle position. b Schematic of the surgery model: PB = patellar bone, VL = vastus lateralis, RF = rectus femoris, VM = vastus medialis, FC = femoral condyles, TT = tibial tuberosity, TH = tibial head, EP = epiphyseal plate. The corresponding post-operative macro image (c) shows the graft in-vivo: the tibio-patellar cerclage (TPC, white suture, yellow in the schematic) is a bone-to-bone cerclage whose function is to directly bypass the function of the patellar tendon, thus to transfer the tensile force of the quad-muscle onto the joint (functionally: knee extension). Additionally, a tibio-musculotendinous cerclage (TMC, green suture) facilitates the construct and due to its more proximal insertion, framing the patellar bone, it is meant to reduce the luxation of the patellar bone. The two graft sutures (blue sutures) are stitched through the graft and the corresponding tendon stump to keep the graft in place. The long free suture ends of both cerclages are placed subcutaneously far away from the construct to reduce tissue granulation. (* indicates the India ink which was used to mark the central full-thickness defect used for a different study). d Macro image after sacrifice: the graft is elevated on a backing, the whole construct is covered with a layer of connective scar tissue. Both graft suture knots are visible underneath (#) and the graft shows proximal and distal continuity within the patello-tibial construct
Fig. 2a Scheme of the patellar bone position (PBP) grading system: the patella bone position is evaluated relative to the supraconylar spur (arrows). Grade 1 (b) is defined as a fully distally located PB to the spur, grade 2 (c) with most of the PB length being distal to the spur, grade 3 (d) with half of the PB being on top of the spur, grade 4 (e) with most of the PB length being proximal to the spur and grade 5 (f) with the whole PB located proximal to the spur. The representative X-ray images also show an increase of the measured patello-tibial distance (PTD). These were measured from the distal pole of the PB to the tibial tuberosity (white lines). The dashed lines illustrate the probable graft plane. At grades 4 and 5 that line crosses the condyles (marked area), implying that the graft is bent over the patellofemoral surface of the femur
Fig. 3Patellar bone position (PBP) grading (a): the dual-cerclage-augmentation technique (DCA) shows a significantly improved distalization of the patella bone position compared to transplant without any cerclage (NCA) or a simple cerclage without a transosseous patella fixation (TFSC). Even though the TFSC technique had better stabilization than NCA, the differences were still significant to the normal, contralateral values. b The measured patello-tibial distance (PTD) was comparable to the contralateral tendon, resembling a sufficient counterforce to the quadriceps muscle, whereas the NCA and TFSC groups were significantly elongated. (One-way ANOVA, rods indicating significant differences with p < 0.0001)