Literature DB >> 18186128

Adhesions in a murine flexor tendon graft model: autograft versus allograft reconstruction.

Sys Hasslund1, Justin A Jacobson, Tulin Dadali, Patrick Basile, Michael Ulrich-Vinther, Kjeld Søballe, Edward M Schwarz, Regis J O'Keefe, David J Mitten, Hani A Awad.   

Abstract

Reconstruction of flexor tendons often results in adhesions that compromise joint flexion. Little is known about the factors involved in the formation of flexor tendon graft adhesions. In this study, we developed and characterized a novel mouse model of flexor digitorum longus (FDL) tendon reconstruction with live autografts or reconstituted freeze-dried allografts. Grafted tendons were evaluated at multiple time points up to 84 days post-reconstruction. To assess the flexion range of the metatarsophalangeal joint, we developed a quantitative outcome measure proportional to the resistance to tendon gliding due to adhesions, which we termed the Gliding Coefficient. At 14 days post-grafting, the Gliding Coefficient was 29- and 26-fold greater than normal FDL tendon for both autografts and allografts, respectively (p < 0.001), and subsequently doubled for 28-day autografts. Interestingly, there were no significant differences in maximum tensile force or stiffness between live autograft and freeze-dried allograft repairs over time. Histologically, autograft healing was characterized by extensive remodeling and exuberant scarring around both the ends and the body of the graft, whereas allograft scarring was abundant only near the graft-host junctions. Gene expression of GDF-5 and VEGF were significantly increased in 28-day autografts compared to allografts and to normal tendons. These results suggest that the biomechanical advantages for tendon reconstruction using live autografts over devitalized allografts are minimal. This mouse model can be useful in elucidating the molecular mechanisms in tendon repair and can aid in preliminary screening of molecular treatments of flexor tendon adhesions. (c) 2008 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18186128      PMCID: PMC2709286          DOI: 10.1002/jor.20531

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  38 in total

Review 1.  Treatment of flexor tendon injuries: surgeons' perspective.

Authors:  J S Taras; M J Lamb
Journal:  J Hand Ther       Date:  1999 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.950

2.  The injured hand; principles of treatment.

Authors:  S BUNNELL
Journal:  Ind Med Surg       Date:  1953-06

3.  Remodeling of cortical bone allografts mediated by adherent rAAV-RANKL and VEGF gene therapy.

Authors:  Hiromu Ito; Mette Koefoed; Prarop Tiyapatanaputi; Kirill Gromov; J Jeffrey Goater; Jonathan Carmouche; Xinping Zhang; Paul T Rubery; Joseph Rabinowitz; R Jude Samulski; Takashi Nakamura; Kjeld Soballe; Regis J O'Keefe; Brendan F Boyce; Edward M Schwarz
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2005-02-13       Impact factor: 53.440

4.  Neutralisation of TGF beta or binding of VLA-4 to fibronectin prevents rat tendon adhesion following transection.

Authors:  Heather G Jørgensen; Sarah D McLellan; James F Crossan; Adam S G Curtis
Journal:  Cytokine       Date:  2005-05-21       Impact factor: 3.861

5.  Molecular studies in flexor tendon wound healing: the role of basic fibroblast growth factor gene expression.

Authors:  J Chang; D Most; R Thunder; B Mehrara; M T Longaker; W C Lineaweaver
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.230

6.  The Marshall R. Urist Young Investigator Award. Autogenous flexor tendon grafts. Biologic mechanisms for incorporation.

Authors:  J G Seiler; C R Chu; D Amiel; S L Woo; R H Gelberman
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Gene expression of transforming growth factor beta-1 in rabbit zone II flexor tendon wound healing: evidence for dual mechanisms of repair.

Authors:  J Chang; D Most; E Stelnicki; J W Siebert; M T Longaker; K Hui; W C Lineaweaver
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 4.730

8.  Autogenous flexor tendon grafts: fibroblast activity and matrix remodeling in dogs.

Authors:  S O Abrahamsson; R H Gelberman; D Amiel; P Winterton; F Harwood
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 3.494

9.  The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs.

Authors:  R H Gelberman; M I Boyer; M D Brodt; S C Winters; M J Silva
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.284

10.  Enhanced tendon healing with GDF 5 and 6.

Authors:  P Aspenberg; C Forslund
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-02
View more
  46 in total

1.  Flexor digitorum superficialis repair outside the A2 pulley after zone II laceration: gliding and bowstringing.

Authors:  Michael B Geary; Christopher English; Zaneb Yaseen; Spencer Stanbury; Hani Awad; John C Elfar
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2015-02-24       Impact factor: 2.230

2.  Repopulation of intrasynovial flexor tendon allograft with bone marrow stromal cells: an ex vivo model.

Authors:  Yasuhiro Ozasa; Peter C Amadio; Andrew R Thoreson; Kai-Nan An; Chunfeng Zhao
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-11-21       Impact factor: 3.845

3.  Non-Invasive Ultrasound Quantification of Scar Tissue Volume Identifies Early Functional Changes During Tendon Healing.

Authors:  Jessica E Ackerman; Valentina Studentsova; Marlin Myers; Mark R Buckley; Michael S Richards; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 3.494

4.  Low-Dose and Short-Duration Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Inhibition Does Not Affect Adhesion Formation during Murine Flexor Tendon Healing.

Authors:  Caitlin A Orner; Michael B Geary; Warren C Hammert; Regis J O'Keefe; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.730

5.  Cell and Biologic-Based Treatment of Flexor Tendon Injuries.

Authors:  Stephen W Linderman; Richard H Gelberman; Stavros Thomopoulos; Hua Shen
Journal:  Oper Tech Orthop       Date:  2016-09

Review 6.  A review on animal models and treatments for the reconstruction of Achilles and flexor tendons.

Authors:  Marta Bottagisio; Arianna B Lovati
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2017-02-02       Impact factor: 3.896

7.  Development of antisense oligonucleotide (ASO) technology against Tgf-β signaling to prevent scarring during flexor tendon repair.

Authors:  Alayna E Loiselle; Kiminori Yukata; Michael B Geary; Sirish Kondabolu; Shanshan Shi; Jennifer H Jonason; Hani A Awad; Regis J O'Keefe
Journal:  J Orthop Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.494

8.  Chondrogenic differentiation of adipose-derived adult stem cells by a porous scaffold derived from native articular cartilage extracellular matrix.

Authors:  Nai-Chen Cheng; Bradley T Estes; Hani A Awad; Farshid Guilak
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.845

9.  Cellular and molecular factors in flexor tendon repair and adhesions: a histological and gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Subhash C Juneja; Edward M Schwarz; Regis J O'Keefe; Hani A Awad
Journal:  Connect Tissue Res       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 3.417

10.  NF-κB activation persists into the remodeling phase of tendon healing and promotes myofibroblast survival.

Authors:  Katherine T Best; Anne E C Nichols; Emma Knapp; Warren C Hammert; Constantinos Ketonis; Jennifer H Jonason; Hani A Awad; Alayna E Loiselle
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2020-11-17       Impact factor: 8.192

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.