| Literature DB >> 31790403 |
Samantha A Hook1,2, Syafiq M Musa1,3, Daniel M Ripley1, Jean-Denis Hibbitt4, Bianka Grunow5, Timo Moritz6,7, Holly A Shiels1.
Abstract
Elasmobranchs display various reproductive modes, which have been key to their evolutionary success. In recent decades there has been a rise in the number of reported cases of foetal abnormalities including fertilised, double-embryos held within one egg capsule, hereafter referred to as twins. Previously, the occurrences of twin egg cases have been reported in two batoid and one shark species. We report the first cases of twins in three species of oviparous elasmobranchs: the undulate ray (Raja undulata), the nursehound (Scyliorhinus stellaris), and the small-spotted catshark (Scyliorhinus canicula). We investigated the genetic relationships between the twins in S. stellaris, and S. canicula using microsatellite markers. Whilst the S. stellaris twins displayed the same genotypes, we found that the S. canicula twin individuals arose through heteropaternal superfecundation. This is the first reported incidence of such a paternity in elasmobranchs. The relationship between environmental change and reproductive strategy in elasmobranchs is unclear and further research is needed to determine its effect on the prevalence and mechanisms of formation of elasmobranch twins.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31790403 PMCID: PMC6886835 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0224397
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1(A1) Two R. undulata juveniles in one, splayed open, egg case. (A2) The ventral surface and (A3) the dorsal surface of the two R. undulata twins. (B1) The S. stellaris twin egg case (middle) next to its paired-egg case and another egg (bottom). (B2) Closer view of the twined egg case. (C1) S. canicula twin embryos (bottom) next to a non-twin sibling (top). (C2) S. canicula twins after removal from their egg case. The black scale bars are 1cm in length.
Genotypic information gathered from each microsatellite locus for the twin individuals (DY1, DY2) and a further randomly selected 6 possible siblings (SIB1-SIB6) of S. stellaris and S. canicula to display the genotype variance.
Microsatellites with a polymorphism information content (PIC) value equal to or higher than 0.500 were used to display genotypes.
| 135 | 137 | 131 | 133 | 268 | 276 | 250 | 252 | |||||
| 135 | 137 | 131 | 133 | 268 | 276 | 250 | 252 | |||||
| 125 | 137 | - | - | 268 | 274 | 248 | 250 | |||||
| 125 | 139 | 133 | 133 | 274 | 274 | 248 | 250 | |||||
| 125 | 139 | 133 | 133 | 266 | 274 | 250 | 250 | |||||
| 137 | 139 | 133 | 137 | 268 | 268 | 248 | 250 | |||||
| 123 | 137 | 131 | 133 | 268 | 276 | 250 | 252 | |||||
| 133 | 141 | 129 | 131 | 274 | 276 | 258 | 260 | |||||
| 132 | 136 | 257 | 265 | 233 | 237 | 119 | 121 | 254 | 256 | 283 | 285 | |
| 136 | 142 | 257 | 257 | 227 | 237 | 119 | 121 | 254 | 260 | 283 | 283 | |
| 132 | 134 | 257 | 267 | 233 | 237 | 119 | 121 | 254 | 256 | 283 | 285 | |
| 136 | 140 | 257 | 265 | 227 | 227 | 117 | 119 | 258 | 260 | 281 | 287 | |
| 132 | 144 | 257 | 265 | 227 | 233 | 119 | 121 | 256 | 260 | 279 | 281 | |
| 132 | 132 | 257 | 265 | 229 | 237 | 117 | 119 | 256 | 258 | 283 | 285 | |
| 132 | 132 | 265 | 265 | 227 | 229 | 117 | 119 | 254 | 258 | 283 | 285 | |
| 132 | 134 | 257 | 263 | 229 | 237 | 119 | 119 | 256 | 258 | 283 | 285 | |
Microsatellite information gathered from each locus for the entire population studied (including the twins) for S. stellaris and S. canicula. N% = Percentage of individuals scored, Na = numbers of alleles, H = expected heterozygosity, H = observed heterozygosity.
| Loci information | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Locus | Tail dye | ||||||||
| Scan 02 | NED | 100 | 7 | 1.000 | 0.858 | 100 | 6 | 0.745 | 0.738 |
| Scan 03 | FAM | 63 | 3 | 0.200 | 0.378 | 96 | 4 | 0.513 | 0.182 |
| Scan 04 | VIC | 50 | 3 | 0.250 | 0.607 | 98 | 5 | 0.689 | 0.474 |
| Scan 05 | NED | 100 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 100 | 4 | 0.543 | 0.450 |
| Scan 06 | FAM | 38 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 100 | 9 | 0.730 | 0.713 |
| Scan 09 | VIC | 88 | 4 | 0.714 | 0.626 | 100 | 2 | 0.025 | 0.000 |
| Scan 10 | NED | 100 | 4 | 0.750 | 0.742 | 98 | 5 | 0.585 | 0.526 |
| Scan 12 | FAM | 100 | 2 | 0.125 | 0.125 | 100 | 6 | 0.666 | 0.638 |
| Scan 13 | VIC | 100 | 4 | 0.500 | 0.517 | 96 | 4 | 0.382 | 0.429 |
| Scan 15 | FAM | 100 | 5 | 0.875 | 0.717 | 98 | 5 | 0.739 | 0.859 |
| Scan 16 | VIC | 38 | 1 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 98 | 6 | 0.730 | 0.756 |
Results of parentage assignment from Cervus and Colony for S.canicula.
Trio log-likelihood ratio (Trio LOD score) is the probability of relationship between the offspring, mother and father. Probability Index = probability of family clusters. DY = Twin individuals, SI = possible sibling individuals. * = no genotype matched.
| Cervus | Colony | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DY1 | MotherB6 | FatherB1 | 7.92E+00 | MotherB6 | FatherB1 | 1 |
| DY2 | MotherB6 | FatherB2 | 2.70E+00 | MotherB6 | FatherB2 | 0.512 |
| SIB1 | MotherB6 | FatherB1 | 3.49E+00 | MotherB6 | FatherB1 | 0.512 |
| SIB2 | MotherB3 | FatherB1 | 6.69E+00 | MotherB3 | FatherB1 | 1 |
| SIB3 | MotherB3 | FatherB1 | 4.81E+00 | MotherB3 | FatherB1 | 1 |
| SIB4 | MotherB5 | FatherB4 | 2.33E+00 | MotherB2 | * | 1 |
| SIB5 | MotherB5 | FatherB1 | 1.75E+00 | MotherB2 | * | 1 |
| SIB6 | MotherB5 | FatherB4 | 3.01E+00 | MotherB2 | * | 1 |