Diana B Coulon1, Ryan Page1, Anne M Raggio1, Justin Guice2, Brain Marx3, Vishnupriya Gourineni4, Maria L Stewart4, Michael J Keenan1. 1. School of Nutrition and Food Science or Animal Sciences, Louisiana State University AgCenter, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. 2. BIO-CAT, 9117 Three Notch Road, Troy, VA, 22974, USA. 3. Experimental Statistics, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, 70803, USA. 4. Ingredion Incorporated, Bridgewater, NJ, 08807, USA.
Abstract
SCOPE: The possible mechanisms of production of four novel resistant starch type 4 (RS4) products for total cecal fermentation in an in vivo rodent model are evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty weanling rats are randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8) for a 3-week study. Starches are the RS type 4 products, as 10% of weight of RS diets (RSA-RSD), and AMIOCA starch (100% amylopectin) comprises 53.6% weight of control (CON) and 43.6% weight of RS diets. The RS products vary by percent purity and origin (potato, corn, tapioca). At euthanasia, cecal contents, serum, GI tract, and abdominal fat are collected. RSB, RSC, and RSD fed rats have greater empty cecum weights, lower cecal content pH, higher cecal content wet weight, and higher total cecal content acetate and propionate than the CON and RSA fed rats. Two other indicators of fermentation, total cecal contents butyrate and glucagon-like peptide 1, do not have significant ANOVA F values, which require more subjects for 80% power. CONCLUSION: RS4 products that are produced from different starch origins with varying amounts of RS4 content and different methods of production are not uniformly fermented in an in vivo model.
SCOPE: The possible mechanisms of production of four novel resistant starch type 4 (RS4) products for total cecal fermentation in an in vivo rodent model are evaluated. METHODS AND RESULTS: Forty weanling rats are randomly assigned to five groups (n = 8) for a 3-week study. Starches are the RS type 4 products, as 10% of weight of RS diets (RSA-RSD), and AMIOCAstarch (100% amylopectin) comprises 53.6% weight of control (CON) and 43.6% weight of RS diets. The RS products vary by percent purity and origin (potato, corn, tapioca). At euthanasia, cecal contents, serum, GI tract, and abdominal fat are collected. RSB, RSC, and RSD fed rats have greater empty cecum weights, lower cecal content pH, higher cecal content wet weight, and higher total cecal content acetate and propionate than the CON and RSA fed rats. Two other indicators of fermentation, total cecal contents butyrate and glucagon-like peptide 1, do not have significant ANOVA F values, which require more subjects for 80% power. CONCLUSION:RS4 products that are produced from different starch origins with varying amounts of RS4 content and different methods of production are not uniformly fermented in an in vivo model.
Authors: Gregor Reid; Estelle Gaudier; Francisco Guarner; Gary B Huffnagle; Jean M Macklaim; Alicia M Munoz; Margaret Martini; Tamar Ringel-Kulka; Balfour Sartor; Robert Unal; Kristin Verbeke; Jens Walter Journal: Gut Microbes Date: 2010 May-Jun
Authors: Ying Hu; Richard K Le Leu; Claus T Christophersen; Roshini Somashekar; Michael A Conlon; Xing Q Meng; Jean M Winter; Richard J Woodman; Ross McKinnon; Graeme P Young Journal: Carcinogenesis Date: 2016-02-19 Impact factor: 4.944
Authors: Michael J Keenan; Jun Zhou; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Anne M Raggio; H Gale Bateman; Emily Todd; Christina K Jones; Richard T Tulley; Sheri Melton; Roy J Martin; Maren Hegsted Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 5.002
Authors: Michael J Keenan; Roy J Martin; Anne M Raggio; Kathleen L McCutcheon; Ian L Brown; Anne Birkett; Susan S Newman; Jihad Skaf; Maren Hegsted; Richard T Tulley; Eric Blair; June Zhou Journal: J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics Date: 2012-04-20
Authors: Diana Obanda; Ryan Page; Justin Guice; Anne M Raggio; Claudia Husseneder; Brian Marx; Rhett W Stout; David A Welsh; Christopher M Taylor; Meng Luo; Eugene E Blanchard; Zach Bendiks; Diana Coulon; Michael J Keenan Journal: Obesity (Silver Spring) Date: 2018-03 Impact factor: 5.002