Literature DB >> 26905582

Manipulation of the gut microbiota using resistant starch is associated with protection against colitis-associated colorectal cancer in rats.

Ying Hu1, Richard K Le Leu2,3, Claus T Christophersen3,4, Roshini Somashekar1, Michael A Conlon5, Xing Q Meng6, Jean M Winter1, Richard J Woodman6, Ross McKinnon1, Graeme P Young1.   

Abstract

This study evaluated whether dietary resistant starch (RS) and green tea extract (GTE), which have anti-inflammatory and anticancer properties, protect against colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) using a rat model, also investigated potential mechanisms of action of these agents including their effects on the gut microbiota. Rats were fed a control diet or diets containing 10% RS, 0.5% GTE or a combination of the two (RS + GTE). CAC was initiated with 2 weekly azoxymethane (AOM) injections (10mg/kg) followed by 2% dextran sodium sulphate in drinking water for 7 days after 2 weeks on diets. Rats were killed 20 weeks after the first AOM. Colon tissues and tumours were examined for histopathology by H&E, gene/protein expression by PCR and immunohistochemistry and digesta for analyses of fermentation products and microbiota populations. RS and RS + GTE (but not GTE) diets significantly (P< 0.05) decreased tumour multiplicity and adenocarcinoma formation, relative to the control diet. Effects of RS + GTE were not different from RS alone. RS diet caused significant shifts in microbial composition/diversity, with increases in Parabacteroides, Barnesiella, Ruminococcus, Marvinbryantia and Bifidobacterium as primary contributors to the shift. RS-containing diets increased short chain fatty acids (SCFA) and expression of the SCFA receptor GPR43 mRNA, and reduced inflammation (COX-2, NF-kB, TNF-α and IL-1β mRNA) and cell proliferation P< 0.05. GTE had no effect. This is the first study that demonstrates chemopreventive effects of RS (but not GTE) in a rodent CAC model, suggesting RS might have benefit to patients with ulcerative colitis who are at an increased risk of developing CRC.
© The Author 2016. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26905582     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgw019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  46 in total

1.  Bowel movement frequency, oxidative stress and disease prevention.

Authors:  Alphons J M Vermorken; Emmanuel Andrès; Yali Cui
Journal:  Mol Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-08-10

Review 2.  Crop resistant starch and genetic improvement: a review of recent advances.

Authors:  Jian Xia; Dong Zhu; Ruomei Wang; Yue Cui; Yueming Yan
Journal:  Theor Appl Genet       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 5.699

Review 3.  Role of Short Chain Fatty Acid Receptors in Intestinal Physiology and Pathophysiology.

Authors:  Medha Priyadarshini; Kumar U Kotlo; Pradeep K Dudeja; Brian T Layden
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2018-06-18       Impact factor: 9.090

4.  The Adaptor Protein CARD9 Protects against Colon Cancer by Restricting Mycobiota-Mediated Expansion of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells.

Authors:  Tingting Wang; Chaogang Fan; Anran Yao; Xingwei Xu; Guoxing Zheng; Yun You; Changying Jiang; Xueqiang Zhao; Yayi Hou; Mien-Chie Hung; Xin Lin
Journal:  Immunity       Date:  2018-09-18       Impact factor: 31.745

5.  The effect of menthol supplement diet on colitis-induced colon tumorigenesis and intestinal microbiota.

Authors:  Lei Luo; Jing Yan; Bingyu Chen; Yi Luo; Lina Liu; Zhiguang Sun; Yin Lu
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

Review 6.  Diet, microorganisms and their metabolites, and colon cancer.

Authors:  Stephen J D O'Keefe
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 46.802

7.  Removal of the cecum affects intestinal fermentation, enteric bacterial community structure, and acute colitis in mice.

Authors:  Kirsty Brown; D Wade Abbott; Richard R E Uwiera; G Douglas Inglis
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2018-03-13

Review 8.  Conserved and variable responses of the gut microbiome to resistant starch type 2.

Authors:  Zachary A Bendiks; Knud E B Knudsen; Michael J Keenan; Maria L Marco
Journal:  Nutr Res       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 3.315

Review 9.  Anticancer effects of the microbiome and its products.

Authors:  Laurence Zitvogel; Romain Daillère; María Paula Roberti; Bertrand Routy; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2017-05-22       Impact factor: 60.633

10.  Novel Resistant Starch Type 4 Products of Different Starch Origins, Production Methods, and Amounts Are Not Equally Fermented when Fed to Sprague-Dawley Rats.

Authors:  Diana B Coulon; Ryan Page; Anne M Raggio; Justin Guice; Brain Marx; Vishnupriya Gourineni; Maria L Stewart; Michael J Keenan
Journal:  Mol Nutr Food Res       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 5.914

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.