Michael S J Wilson1, P Vaughan-Shaw2, C Boyle3, G L Yong4, S Oglesby5, R Skipworth6, P Lamb6, E A T Griffiths7, S E A Attwood8. 1. Department of General Surgery, Forth Valley Royal Hospital, Larbert, FK5 4WR, UK. michaelwilson3@nhs.net. 2. Department of Colorectal Surgery, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh, E4 2XU, UK. 3. Graduate School of Education, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK. 4. Department of Radiology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, E16 4SA, UK. 5. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Ninewells Hospital, Dundee, D2 1SY, UK. 6. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, E16 4SA, UK. 7. Department of Upper GI Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK. 8. Department of Health Services Research, Durham University, Durham, D1 3RW, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities amongst benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high-priority research questions. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-seven questions were submitted in phase I, and 51 with a benign UGI focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Twenty-eight questions were ranked in phase III. A final list of 11 high-priority questions had an emphasis on acute pancreatitis, Barrett's oesophagus and benign biliary disease. CONCLUSION: A modified Delphi process has produced a list of 11 high-priority research questions in benign UGI surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research.
BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to use a modified Delphi process to determine the research priorities amongst benign upper gastrointestinal (UGI) surgeons in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Delphi methodology may be utilised to develop consensus opinion amongst a group of experts. Members of the Association of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland were invited to submit individual research questions via an online survey (phase I). Two rounds of prioritisation by multidisciplinary expert healthcare professionals (phase II and III) were completed to determine a final list of high-priority research questions. RESULTS: Four hundred and twenty-seven questions were submitted in phase I, and 51 with a benign UGI focus were taken forward for prioritisation in phase II. Twenty-eight questions were ranked in phase III. A final list of 11 high-priority questions had an emphasis on acute pancreatitis, Barrett's oesophagus and benign biliary disease. CONCLUSION: A modified Delphi process has produced a list of 11 high-priority research questions in benign UGI surgery. Future studies and awards from funding bodies should reflect this consensus list of prioritised questions in the interest of improving patient care and encouraging collaborative research.
Authors: Caroline G Burt; Robert R Cima; Walter A Koltun; Charles E Littlejohn; Rocco Ricciardi; Larissa K Temple; David A Rothenberger; Nancy N Baxter Journal: Dis Colon Rectum Date: 2009-05 Impact factor: 4.585
Authors: Syed Nabeel Zafar; Augustine Obirieze; Babawande Adesibikan; Edward E Cornwell; Terrence M Fullum; Daniel D Tran Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Oliver Old; Paul Moayyedi; Sharon Love; Corran Roberts; Julie Hapeshi; Chris Foy; Clive Stokes; Andrew Briggs; Janusz Jankowski; Hugh Barr Journal: J Med Screen Date: 2015-03-12 Impact factor: 2.136
Authors: Sari Räty; Jukka Pulkkinen; Isto Nordback; Juhani Sand; Mikael Victorzon; Juha Grönroos; Heli Helminen; Pekka Kuusanmäki; Pia Nordström; Hannu Paajanen Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2015-11 Impact factor: 12.969
Authors: Tom Wiggins; Sheraz R Markar; Hugh MacKenzie; Omar Faiz; Dipankar Mukherjee; David E Khoo; Sanjay Purkayastha; Ian Beckingham; George B Hanna Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2019-04-04 Impact factor: 4.584
Authors: Breda H Eubank; Nicholas G Mohtadi; Mark R Lafave; J Preston Wiley; Aaron J Bois; Richard S Boorman; David M Sheps Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2016-05-20 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Janusz A Z Jankowski; John de Caestecker; Sharon B Love; Gavin Reilly; Peter Watson; Scott Sanders; Yeng Ang; Danielle Morris; Pradeep Bhandari; Claire Brooks; Stephen Attwood; Rebecca Harrison; Hugh Barr; Paul Moayyedi Journal: Lancet Date: 2018-07-26 Impact factor: 202.731
Authors: D S G Scrimgeour; M Allan; S R Knight; B East; S Blackwell; N Dames; L Laidlaw; D Light; L Horgan; N J Smart; A de Beaux; M S J Wilson Journal: Hernia Date: 2021-10-31 Impact factor: 2.920
Authors: Guo Liang Yong; Jonathan Weir-McCall; Michael Wilson; Giles H Roditi; Russell Bull; Michelle Claire Williams; Matthias Schmitt Journal: Open Heart Date: 2020-10