Literature DB >> 25767103

Barrett's Oesophagus Surveillance versus endoscopy at need Study (BOSS): protocol and analysis plan for a multicentre randomized controlled trial.

Oliver Old1, Paul Moayyedi2, Sharon Love3, Corran Roberts3, Julie Hapeshi1, Chris Foy1, Clive Stokes1, Andrew Briggs4, Janusz Jankowski5, Hugh Barr6.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The absolute annual risk of patients with Barrett's oesophagus (BO) developing oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) is ≤ 0.5%. Screening BO patients for malignant progression using endoscopic surveillance is widely practised. To assess the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of this, we developed a protocol for a randomized controlled trial of surveillance versus 'at need' endoscopy.
METHODS: In a multicentre trial, 3400 BO patients randomized to either 2-yearly endoscopic surveillance or 'at need' endoscopy will be followed up for 10 years. Urgent endoscopy will be offered to all patients who develop symptoms of dysphagia, unexplained weight loss > 7lb (3.2 kg), iron deficiency anaemia, recurrent vomiting, or worsening upper gastrointestinal symptoms. Participants must have endoscopically and histologically confirmed BO, with circumferential BO ≥ 1 cm or maximal tongue/island length ≥ 2 cm. Candidates with existing oesophageal high-grade dysplasia or cancer, or previous upper gastrointestinal cancer will be excluded. Primary outcome will be overall survival. Secondary outcomes will be cost effectiveness (cost per life year saved and quality adjusted life years); cancer-specific survival; time to OAC diagnosis and stage at diagnosis; morbidity and mortality related to any interventions; and frequency of endoscopy.
CONCLUSIONS: This randomized trial will provide data to evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of screening BO patients for OAC.
© The Author(s) 2015.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Barrett's oesophagus; Endoscopy; Gastro-oesophageal reflux disease; Oesophageal adenocarcinoma; Randomized controlled trial; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25767103     DOI: 10.1177/0969141315575052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Screen        ISSN: 0969-1413            Impact factor:   2.136


  15 in total

1.  Response to Feuerstein J et al. "Systematic Analysis and Critical Appraisal of the Quality of the Scientific Evidence and Conflicts of Interest in Practice Guidelines (2005-2013) for Barrett's Esophagus". doi:10.1007/s10620-016-4222-2.

Authors:  Cathy Bennett; Janusz Jankowski; Paul Moayyedi
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Point-Counterpoint: Screening and Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus, Is It Worthwhile?

Authors:  Fouad Otaki; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Endoscopic surveillance or ablation for Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  John M Inadomi; Nina Saxena
Journal:  Transl Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 4.  Endoscopic Screening for Barrett's Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: Rationale, Candidates, and Challenges.

Authors:  Amrit K Kamboj; David A Katzka; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 5.  The Effect of Endoscopic Surveillance in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Don Chamil Codipilly; Apoorva Krishna Chandar; Siddharth Singh; Sachin Wani; Nicholas J Shaheen; John M Inadomi; Amitabh Chak; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  A Modified AUGIS Delphi Process to Establish Future Research Priorities in Benign Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Michael S J Wilson; P Vaughan-Shaw; C Boyle; G L Yong; S Oglesby; R Skipworth; P Lamb; E A T Griffiths; S E A Attwood
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Dedicated service improves the accuracy of Barrett's oesophagus surveillance: a prospective comparative cohort study.

Authors:  James Britton; Kelly Chatten; Tom Riley; Richard R Keld; Shaheen Hamdy; John McLaughlin; Yeng Ang
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2018-09-05

Review 8.  Best Practices in Surveillance for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph R Triggs; Gary W Falk
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am       Date:  2020-10-21

9.  Receipt of Serial Endoscopy Procedures Prior to Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosis Is Associated with Better Survival.

Authors:  Linda C Cummings; Tzuyung Doug Kou; Amitabh Chak; Mark D Schluchter; Seunghee Margevicius; Gregory S Cooper
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2021-04-21       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  What is the optimal surveillance strategy for non-dysplastic Barrett's esophagus?

Authors:  Ying Gibbens; Prasad G Iyer
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-06-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.