Literature DB >> 25517723

Optimal time for early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Syed Nabeel Zafar1, Augustine Obirieze1, Babawande Adesibikan2, Edward E Cornwell1, Terrence M Fullum1, Daniel D Tran1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: There is growing evidence in support of performing early laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) for acute cholecystitis. However, the definition of early LC varies from 0 through 10 days depending on the research protocol. The optimum time to perform early LC is still unclear.
OBJECTIVES: To determine whether outcomes after early LC for acute cholecystitis vary depending on time from presentation to surgery and to determine the optimum time to perform LC for acute cholecystitis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We performed a retrospective review of prospectively collected data from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) for 2005 through 2009. The population-based sample included 95,523 adults (18 years and older) who underwent LC within 10 days of presentation for acute cholecystitis.
INTERVENTIONS: Patients were categorized and analyzed in 2 ways based on length of time from presentation to surgery. First, patients were categorized into 3 groups: 0 through 1 day, 2 through 5 days, and 6 through 10 days. Second, we compared outcomes for each incremental preoperative day (days 0-5). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Outcomes of interest were mortality, length of stay, complications, and cost. Propensity score matching and generalized linear modeling were used. The hypothesis being tested was formulated after data collection was complete.
RESULTS: A total of 95,523 patients were selected. After matching the 3 groups based on propensity scores, patients who underwent surgery during days 2 through 5 and days 6 through 10 had increasingly worse outcomes when compared with those undergoing surgery on days 0 through 1. The odds of mortality were 1.26 (95% CI, 1.00-1.58) and 1.93 (95% CI, 1.38-2.68), and the odds of postoperative infections were 0.88 (95% CI, 0.69-1.12) and 1.53 (95% CI, 1.05-2.23) for days 2 through 5 and days 6 through 10, respectively. Adjusted mean hospital cost increased from $8974 (days 0-1) to $17,745 (days 6-10). Analysis by each incremental day revealed the optimal time of surgery to be within the first 48 hours of presentation. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy performed within 2 days of presentation of acute cholecystitis yielded the best outcomes and lowest costs. Although causality could not be established, delaying LC was associated with more complications, higher mortality, and higher costs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25517723     DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.2339

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Surg        ISSN: 2168-6254            Impact factor:   14.766


  28 in total

1.  Impact of a dedicated emergency surgical unit on early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  S Bokhari; U Walsh; K Qurashi; L Liasis; J Watfah; M Sen; S Gould
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  An observational study of the timing of surgery, use of laparoscopy and outcomes for acute cholecystitis in the USA and UK.

Authors:  A C Murray; S Markar; H Mackenzie; O Baser; T Wiggins; A Askari; G Hanna; O Faiz; E Mayer; C Bicknell; A Darzi; R P Kiran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-01-08       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Percutaneous cholecystostomy: prognostic factors and comparison to cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Elisha M Collins; Camille G Dessaigne; Amber N Himmler; Alicia M Mohr; Ryan M Thomas; Charles E Hobson; George A Sarosi; William J Zingarelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Risk-adjusted treatment selection and outcome of patients with acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  J I González-Muñoz; G Franch-Arcas; M Angoso-Clavijo; M Sánchez-Hernández; A García-Plaza; M Caraballo-Angeli; L Muñoz-Bellvís
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 3.445

5.  Postoperative complications and mortality: Are they unavoidable?

Authors:  Itaru Endo; Takafumi Kumamoto; Ryusei Matsuyama
Journal:  Ann Gastroenterol Surg       Date:  2017-10-13

6.  Early versus delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: an up-to-date meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Yunxiao Lyu; Yunxiao Cheng; Bin Wang; Sicong Zhao; Liang Chen
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Near-infrared cholecysto-cholangiography with indocyanine green may secure cholecystectomy in difficult clinical situations: proof of the concept in a porcine model.

Authors:  Yu-Yin Liu; Seong-Ho Kong; Michele Diana; Andras Lègner; Chun-Chi Wu; Noriaki Kameyama; Bernard Dallemagne; Jacques Marescaux
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Training vs practice: A tale of opposition in acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  Purvi P Patel; Shaun C Daly; Jose M Velasco
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-10-18

9.  Managing acute cholecystitis among Medicaid insured in New York State: opportunities to optimize care.

Authors:  Anne M Stey; Alexander J Greenstein; Arthur Aufses; Alan J Moskowitz; Natalia N Egorova
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-02-12       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Evaluation of the CT Scan as the First Examination for the Diagnosis and Therapeutic Strategy for Acute Cholecystitis.

Authors:  S Martellotto; A Dohan; M Pocard
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-06       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.