Literature DB >> 31787500

The Perceptual Prediction Paradox.

Clare Press1, Peter Kok2, Daniel Yon3.   

Abstract

From the noisy information bombarding our senses, our brains must construct percepts that are veridical - reflecting the true state of the world - and informative - conveying what we did not already know. Influential theories suggest that both challenges are met through mechanisms that use expectations about the likely state of the world to shape perception. However, current models explaining how expectations render perception either veridical or informative are mutually incompatible. While the former propose that perceptual experiences are dominated by events we expect, the latter propose that perception of expected events is suppressed. To solve this paradox we propose a two-process model in which probabilistic knowledge initially biases perception towards what is likely and subsequently upweights events that are particularly surprising.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Keywords:  expectation; inference; learning; perception; surprise

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31787500     DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.11.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci        ISSN: 1364-6613            Impact factor:   20.229


  31 in total

1.  Neural Mechanisms for Prediction: From Action to Higher-Order Cognition.

Authors:  Anila M D'Mello; Liron Rozenkrantz
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 2.  Perceptual variability: Implications for learning and generalization.

Authors:  Jonas Zaman; Anastasia Chalkia; Ann-Kathrin Zenses; Antoine Selim Bilgin; Tom Beckers; Bram Vervliet; Yannick Boddez
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-02

3.  The graded novelty encoding task: Novelty gradually improves recognition of visual stimuli under incidental learning conditions.

Authors:  Bertalan Polner; Péter Simor; Richárd Reichardt
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2022-06-13

4.  Oculomotor freezing indicates conscious detection free of decision bias.

Authors:  Alex L White; James C Moreland; Martin Rolfs
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-01-26       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Motivation(s) from control: response-effect contingency and confirmation of sensorimotor predictions reinforce different levels of selection.

Authors:  Eitan Hemed; Noam Karsh; Ilya Mark-Tavger; Baruch Eitam
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Electrophysiological correlates of perceptual prediction error are attenuated in dyslexia.

Authors:  Sara D Beach; Sung-Joo Lim; Carlos Cardenas-Iniguez; Marianna D Eddy; John D E Gabrieli; Tyler K Perrachione
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Increased Functional Connectivity of the Intraparietal Sulcus Underlies the Attenuation of Numerosity Estimations for Self-Generated Words.

Authors:  Giedre Stripeikyte; Michael Pereira; Giulio Rognini; Jevita Potheegadoo; Olaf Blanke; Nathan Faivre
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2021-09-08       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  Are self-caused distractors easier to ignore? Experiments with the flanker task.

Authors:  CiJun Gao; Davood G Gozli
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  Real-world structure facilitates the rapid emergence of scene category information in visual brain signals.

Authors:  Daniel Kaiser; Greta Häberle; Radoslaw M Cichy
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Rapid computations of spectrotemporal prediction error support perception of degraded speech.

Authors:  Ediz Sohoglu; Matthew H Davis
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 8.140

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.