Literature DB >> 35697959

The graded novelty encoding task: Novelty gradually improves recognition of visual stimuli under incidental learning conditions.

Bertalan Polner1, Péter Simor2,3, Richárd Reichardt4,5.   

Abstract

It has been argued that novel compared to familiar stimuli are preferentially encoded into memory. Nevertheless, treating novelty as a categorical variable in experimental research is considered simplistic. We highlight the dimensional aspect of novelty and propose an experimental design that manipulates novelty continuously. We created the Graded Novelty Encoding Task (GNET), in which the difference between stimuli (i.e. novelty) is parametrically manipulated, paving the way for quantitative models of novelty processing. We designed an algorithm which generates visual stimuli by placing colored shapes in a grid. During the familiarization phase of the task, we repeatedly presented five pictures to the participants. In a subsequent incidental learning phase, participants were asked to differentiate between the "familiars" and novel images that varied in the degree of difference to the familiarized pictures (i.e. novelty). Finally, participants completed a surprise recognition memory test, where the novel stimuli from the previous phase were interspersed with distractors with similar difference characteristics. We numerically expressed the differences between the stimuli to compute a dimensional indicator of novelty and assessed whether it predicted recognition memory performance. Based on previous studies showing the beneficial effect of novelty on memory formation, we hypothesized that the more novel a given picture was, the better subsequent recognition performance participants would demonstrate. Our hypothesis was confirmed: recognition performance was higher for more novel stimuli. The GNET captures the continuous nature of novelty, and it may be useful in future studies that examine the behavioral and neurocognitive aspects of novelty processing.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Incidental learning; Novelty; Parametric manipulation; Recognition memory; Visual stimuli

Year:  2022        PMID: 35697959     DOI: 10.3758/s13428-022-01891-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  22 in total

Review 1.  Predictive, interactive multiple memory systems.

Authors:  Richard N Henson; Pierre Gagnepain
Journal:  Hippocampus       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 3.899

2.  An unexpected sequence of events: mismatch detection in the human hippocampus.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 8.029

3.  Independent contributions of fMRI familiarity and novelty effects to recognition memory and their stability across the adult lifespan.

Authors:  Marianne de Chastelaine; Julia T Mattson; Tracy H Wang; Brian E Donley; Michael D Rugg
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Novelty signals: a window into hippocampal information processing.

Authors:  Dharshan Kumaran; Eleanor A Maguire
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2009-01-08       Impact factor: 20.229

Review 5.  Memory: Organization and Control.

Authors:  Howard Eichenbaum
Journal:  Annu Rev Psychol       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 24.137

6.  Mnemonic discrimination of similar face stimuli and a potential mechanism for the "other race" effect.

Authors:  Allen Chang; Elizabeth Murray; Michael A Yassa
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 1.912

Review 7.  Expectation-driven novelty effects in episodic memory.

Authors:  Darya Frank; Alex Kafkas
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2021-05-26       Impact factor: 2.877

8.  Does prediction error drive one-shot declarative learning?

Authors:  Andrea Greve; Elisa Cooper; Alexander Kaula; Michael C Anderson; Richard Henson
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.059

Review 9.  How do memory systems detect and respond to novelty?

Authors:  Alex Kafkas; Daniela Montaldi
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-02-03       Impact factor: 3.046

Review 10.  Novelty and Dopaminergic Modulation of Memory Persistence: A Tale of Two Systems.

Authors:  Adrian J Duszkiewicz; Colin G McNamara; Tomonori Takeuchi; Lisa Genzel
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 13.837

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.