Literature DB >> 31784052

Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

Muhammad Zia Khan1, Muhammad Bilal Munir2, Muhammad U Khan3, Mohammed Osman2, Pratik Agrawal2, Moinuddin Syed2, Yasir Abdul Ghaffar2, Anas Alharbi2, Safi U Khan3, Sudarshan Balla2.   

Abstract

Cardiogenic shock (CS) carries high mortality and morbidity. Early revascularization is an important strategy in management of these patients. We sought to determine the outcomes and predictors of revascularization among patients with CS. Patients with CS and acute myocardial infarction were identified using the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) data from January 2002 to December 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes. Subsequently, patients who underwent revascularization were then selected. A total of 118,618 patients with CS were identified. Out of these, about 55,735 (47%) patients underwent revascularization. Mean age of patients who underwent revascularization was lower when compared with patients not who underwent revascularization (66.40 vs 72.24 years, p < 0.01). Patients who underwent revascularization had lower mortality when compared with patients not who underwent revascularization (25.1% vs 52.2%, p < 0.01). Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and mechanical circulatory support devices were often utilized more in patients who underwent revascularization. Overall, we found modest increased trend of revascularization over our study years with decline in mortality. Female gender, weekend admission, drug abuse, pulmonary hypertension, anemia, renal failure, neurological disorders, malignancy were associated with lower odds of revascularization. In conclusion, in this large nationally represented US population sample of CS patients, we found revascularization rate of about 47% with improvement in overall mortality over our study years.
Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31784052      PMCID: PMC7453955          DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2019.10.040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  15 in total

1.  Hospital-Level Disparities in the Outcomes of Acute Myocardial Infarction With Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Saraschandra Vallabhajosyula; Shannon M Dunlay; Gregory W Barsness; Charanjit S Rihal; David R Holmes; Abhiram Prasad
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-05-28       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Comparison of hospital mortality with intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation insertion before versus after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Mohamed Abdel-Wahab; Mohammed Saad; Joerg Kynast; Volker Geist; Mohammad A Sherif; Gert Richardt; Ralph Toelg
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Anvar Babaev; Paul D Frederick; David J Pasta; Nathan Every; Tina Sichrovsky; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-07-27       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 4.  Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Authors:  Bhuvnesh Aggarwal; Wahaj Aman; Omar Jeroudi; Neal S Kleiman
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2018 Jan-Mar

5.  A randomized evaluation of early revascularization to treat shock complicating acute myocardial infarction. The (Swiss) Multicenter Trial of Angioplasty for Shock-(S)MASH.

Authors:  P Urban; J C Stauffer; D Bleed; N Khatchatrian; W Amann; O Bertel; M van den Brand; N Danchin; U Kaufmann; B Meier; J Machecourt; M Pfisterer
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 29.983

Review 6.  Contemporary Management of Cardiogenic Shock: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Authors:  Sean van Diepen; Jason N Katz; Nancy M Albert; Timothy D Henry; Alice K Jacobs; Navin K Kapur; Ahmet Kilic; Venu Menon; E Magnus Ohman; Nancy K Sweitzer; Holger Thiele; Jeffrey B Washam; Mauricio G Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Evaluation of care and surveillance of cardiovascular disease: can we trust medico-administrative hospital data?

Authors:  Laurie Lambert; Claudia Blais; Denis Hamel; Kevin Brown; Stéphane Rinfret; Raymond Cartier; Maude Giguère; Céline Carroll; Christiane Beauchamp; Peter Bogaty
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.223

8.  Ten-year trends in the incidence and treatment of cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Raban V Jeger; Dragana Radovanovic; Patrick R Hunziker; Matthias E Pfisterer; Jean-Christophe Stauffer; Paul Erne; Philip Urban
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Feasibility of early mechanical circulatory support in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock: The Detroit cardiogenic shock initiative.

Authors:  Mir B Basir; Theodore Schreiber; Simon Dixon; Khaldoon Alaswad; Kirit Patel; Steven Almany; Akshay Khandelwal; Ivan Hanson; Augustine George; Michael Ashbrook; Nimrod Blank; Murad Abdelsalam; Nishtha Sareen; Steven B H Timmis; William W O'Neill Md
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2017-12-20       Impact factor: 2.692

10.  Trends in Coronary Angiography, Revascularization, and Outcomes of Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Non-ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Dhaval Kolte; Sahil Khera; Kaustubh C Dabhadkar; Shikhar Agarwal; Wilbert S Aronow; Robert Timmermans; Diwakar Jain; Howard A Cooper; William H Frishman; Venu Menon; Deepak L Bhatt; J Dawn Abbott; Gregg C Fonarow; Julio A Panza
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.778

View more
  4 in total

1.  Left ventricular unloading during extracorporeal life support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: surgical venting versus Impella device.

Authors:  Darko Radakovic; Armin Zittermann; Alen Knezevic; Artyom Razumov; Dragan Opacic; Nicole Wienrautner; Christian Flottmann; Sebastian V Rojas; Henrik Fox; René Schramm; Michiel Morshuis; Volker Rudolph; Jan Gummert; Marcus-André Deutsch
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-08-15

2.  Trends of Clinical Outcomes and Health Care Resource Use in Heart Failure in the United States.

Authors:  Safi U Khan; Muhammad Zia Khan; Mohamad Alkhouli
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2020-07-04       Impact factor: 5.501

3.  Development of a machine learning model to predict the risk of late cardiogenic shock in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Zhixun Bai; Shan Hu; Yan Wang; Wenwen Deng; Ning Gu; Ranzun Zhao; Wei Zhang; Yi Ma; Zhenglong Wang; Zhijiang Liu; Changyin Shen; Bei Shi
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-07

4.  Dysbiosis of Gut Microbiota in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction.

Authors:  Ying Han; Zhaowei Gong; Guizhi Sun; Jing Xu; Changlu Qi; Weiju Sun; Huijie Jiang; Peigang Cao; Hong Ju
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 5.640

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.