Literature DB >> 29623169

Mechanical Circulatory Support in High-Risk Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.

Bhuvnesh Aggarwal1, Wahaj Aman1, Omar Jeroudi1, Neal S Kleiman1.   

Abstract

Due to advancing age and increasing comorbidities, the current population has a higher incidence of complex coronary artery disease, often without surgical options for revascularization. In this setting, hemodynamic support devices are an important adjunct in the interventionist's toolbox as they allow for a safer, more effective procedure. The following paper reviews the indications of various available mechanical support devices, highlights their clinical data and technical parameters, and offers a practical approach towards appropriate patient and device selection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cardiogenic shock; coronary artery disease; high-risk; mechanical circulatory support; percutaneous coronary intervention; stent

Mesh：

Year:  2018        PMID： 29623169      PMCID： PMC5880556          DOI： 10.14797/mdcj-14-1-23

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J        ISSN： 1947-6108


  33 in total

Review 1.  Contemporary extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adult respiratory failure: life support in the new era.

Authors:  Graeme MacLaren; Alain Combes; Robert H Bartlett
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2011-12-07       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 2.  Systematic review of percutaneous cardiopulmonary bypass for cardiac arrest or cardiogenic shock states.

Authors:  Graham Nichol; Riyad Karmy-Jones; Chris Salerno; Lisa Cantore; Lance Becker
Journal:  Resuscitation       Date:  2006-07-10       Impact factor: 5.262

3.  Early extracorporeal membrane oxygenator-assisted primary percutaneous coronary intervention improved 30-day clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction complicated with profound cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Jiunn-Jye Sheu; Tzu-Hsien Tsai; Fan-Yen Lee; Hsiu-Yu Fang; Cheuk-Kwan Sun; Steve Leu; Cheng-Hsu Yang; Shyh-Ming Chen; Chi-Ling Hang; Yuan-Kai Hsieh; Chien-Jen Chen; Chiung-Jen Wu; Hon-Kan Yip
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Small coronary vessel pressure and diameter in an intact beating rabbit heart using fixed-position and free-motion techniques.

Authors:  S H Nellis; A J Liedtke; L Whitesell
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 17.367

5.  Randomized comparison of intra-aortic balloon support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device in patients with revascularized acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Peter Sick; Enno Boudriot; Klaus-Werner Diederich; Rainer Hambrecht; Josef Niebauer; Gerhard Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2005-02-25       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Thrombolysis and counterpulsation to improve survival in myocardial infarction complicated by hypotension and suspected cardiogenic shock or heart failure: results of the TACTICS Trial.

Authors:  E Magnus Ohman; John Nanas; Robert J Stomel; Massoud A Leesar; Dennis W T Nielsen; Daniel O'Dea; Felix J Rogers; Daniel Harber; Michael P Hudson; Elizabeth Fraulo; Linda K Shaw; Kerry L Lee
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.300

7.  Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. SHOCK Investigators. Should We Emergently Revascularize Occluded Coronaries for Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  J S Hochman; L A Sleeper; J G Webb; T A Sanborn; H D White; J D Talley; C E Buller; A K Jacobs; J N Slater; J Col; S M McKinlay; T H LeJemtel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-08-26       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 8.  Percutaneous left ventricular assist devices in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Holger Thiele; Richard W Smalling; Gerhard C Schuler
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 29.983

9.  A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a percutaneous left ventricular assist device versus intra-aortic balloon pumping for treatment of cardiogenic shock caused by myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Melchior Seyfarth; Dirk Sibbing; Iris Bauer; Georg Fröhlich; Lorenz Bott-Flügel; Robert Byrne; Josef Dirschinger; Adnan Kastrati; Albert Schömig
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 24.094

Review 10.  IABP: history-evolution-pathophysiology-indications: what we need to know.

Authors:  H Parissis; V Graham; S Lampridis; M Lau; G Hooks; P C Mhandu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 1.637
View more
  2 in total

1.  Trends, Outcomes, and Predictors of Revascularization in Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Muhammad Zia Khan; Muhammad Bilal Munir; Muhammad U Khan; Mohammed Osman; Pratik Agrawal; Moinuddin Syed; Yasir Abdul Ghaffar; Anas Alharbi; Safi U Khan; Sudarshan Balla
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 2.778

2.  Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support devices in high-risk patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized trials.

Authors:  Wenhai Shi; Wuwan Wang; Kechun Wang; Wei Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.817
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.