Literature DB >> 16046651

Trends in management and outcomes of patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Anvar Babaev1, Paul D Frederick, David J Pasta, Nathan Every, Tina Sichrovsky, Judith S Hochman.   

Abstract

CONTEXT: Early mechanical revascularization in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock is a therapeutic strategy that reduces mortality. It has been a class I recommendation in guidelines from the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association since 1999 for patients younger than 75 years. However, little is known about implementation of these guidelines in practice.
OBJECTIVES: To assess trends in early revascularization and mortality for patients with cardiogenic shock complicating AMI and to determine whether the national guidelines affect revascularization rates. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Prospective, observational study of 293,633 patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (25,311 [8.6%] had cardiogenic shock; 7356 [29%] had cardiogenic shock at hospital presentation) enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI) from January 1995 to May 2004 at 775 US hospitals with revascularization capability (defined as the capability to perform cardiac catheterization, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI], and open-heart surgery). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Management patterns and in-hospital mortality rates.
RESULTS: There was an increase in primary PCI rates from 27.4% to 54.4% (P<.001) in hospitals with revascularization capability that paralleled the change in PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. There was no significant change in rates of immediate coronary artery bypass graft surgery (from 2.1% to 3.2%). Propensity-adjusted multivariable analyses demonstrated that primary PCI was associated with a decreased odds of death during hospitalization (odds ratio, 0.46; 95% confidence interval, 0.40-0.53). There were no differences in the rates of change in revascularization rates based on the date when the guidelines were released regardless of patient age. Overall in-hospital cardiogenic shock mortality decreased from 60.3% in 1995 to 47.9% in 2004 (P<.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The use of PCI for patients with cardiogenic shock was associated with improved survival in a large group of hospitals with revascularization capability. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association guidelines had no detectable temporal impact on revascularization rates. These findings support the need for increased adherence to these guidelines.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16046651     DOI: 10.1001/jama.294.4.448

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  121 in total

Review 1.  Stenting of complex lesions: an overview.

Authors:  Usman Baber; Annapoorna S Kini; Samin K Sharma
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Early revascularization and long-term survival in cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Judith S Hochman; Lynn A Sleeper; John G Webb; Vladimir Dzavik; Christopher E Buller; Philip Aylward; Jacques Col; Harvey D White
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-06-07       Impact factor: 56.272

3.  Unequal access to interventional cardiac care in Nova Scotia in patients with acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  J Mayich; Jafna L Cox; Karen J Buth; Jean-Francois Légaré
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 5.223

4.  Cardiogenic shock--an inflammatory disease.

Authors:  Gottfried Heinz
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.704

Review 5.  [Therapy of cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction].

Authors:  M Ferrari; H R Figulla
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Early discharge after primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST-elevation myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Awsan Noman; Azfar G Zaman; Clyde Schechter; Karthik Balasubramaniam; Rajiv Das
Journal:  Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care       Date:  2013-09

Review 7.  Management of refractory cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Alex Reyentovich; Maya H Barghash; Judith S Hochman
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 32.419

8.  Thirty-year trends (1975 to 2005) in the magnitude of, management of, and hospital death rates associated with cardiogenic shock in patients with acute myocardial infarction: a population-based perspective.

Authors:  Robert J Goldberg; Frederick A Spencer; Joel M Gore; Darleen Lessard; Jorge Yarzebski
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2009-02-23       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 9.  [Infarct-related cardiogenic shock : Prognosis and treatment].

Authors:  R Prondzinsky; H Lemm; A Geppert; M Buerke; M Russ; K Werdan
Journal:  Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 0.840

10.  The Use of Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in a Real-World Setting: A Comparison between Survivors and Nonsurvivors from Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with IABP. The Jakarta Acute Coronary Syndrome Registry.

Authors:  Surya Dharma; Iwan Dakota; Isman Firdaus; Alexander J Wardeh; J Wouter Jukema
Journal:  Int J Angiol       Date:  2013-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.