| Literature DB >> 31783486 |
Zuzana Hamšíková1, Cornelia Silaghi2, Katsuhisa Takumi3, Ivo Rudolf4, Kristyna Gunár5, Hein Sprong3, Mária Kazimírová1.
Abstract
The way in which European genetic variants of Anaplasma phagocytophilum circulate in their natural foci and which variants cause disease in humans or livestock remains thus far unclear. Red deer and roe deer are suggested to be reservoirs for some European A. phagocytophilum strains, and Ixodes ricinus is their principal vector. Based on groEL gene sequences, five A. phagocytophilum ecotypes have been identified. Ecotype I is associated with the broadest host range, including strains that cause disease in domestic animals and humans. Ecotype II is associated with roe deer and does not include zoonotic strains. In the present study, questing I. ricinus were collected in urban, pasture, and natural habitats in the Czech Republic, Germany, and Slovakia. A fragment of the msp2 gene of A. phagocytophilum was amplified by real-time PCR in DNA isolated from ticks. Positive samples were further analyzed by nested PCRs targeting fragments of the 16S rRNA and groEL genes, followed by sequencing. Samples were stratified according to the presence/absence of roe deer at the sampling sites. Geographic origin, habitat, and tick stage were also considered. The probability that A. phagocytophilum is a particular ecotype was estimated by a generalized linear model. Anaplasma phagocytophilum was identified by genetic typing in 274 I. ricinus ticks. The majority belonged to ecotype I (63.9%), 28.5% were ecotype II, and both ecotypes were identified in 7.7% of ticks. Ecotype II was more frequently identified in ticks originating from a site with presence of roe deer, whereas ecotype I was more frequent in adult ticks than in nymphs. Models taking into account the country-specific, site-specific, and habitat-specific aspects did not improve the goodness of the fit. Thus, roe deer presence in a certain site and the tick developmental stage are suggested to be the two factors consistently influencing the occurrence of a particular A. phagocytophilum ecotype in a positive I. ricinus tick.Entities:
Keywords: Anaplasma phagocytophilum; Ixodes ricinus; deer; ecotype
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31783486 PMCID: PMC6926711 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16234725
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Geographical location of tick sampling sites.
| Country | Acronym | Name of the Site | Landscape | Geographic Coordinates | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Germany | A1 | Englischer Garten | Urban park | 48°09′01.73″ N | 11°35′24.19″ E |
| A2 | Nymphenburger Schlosspark | Urban park | 48°09′38.93″ N | 11°29′33.31″ E | |
| A3 | Dörnbergpark | Urban park | 49°00′55.72″ N | 12°05′08.89″ E | |
| A4 | Schlosspark Berg | Forest park | 47°57′43.85″ N | 11°20′53.35″ E | |
| A5 | Kerschlach | Agricultural | 47°54′57.18″ N | 11°12′44.04″ E | |
| A6 | Tussenhausen | Natural | 48°06′36.42″ N | 10°34′33.40″ E | |
| Czech Republic | B1 | Valtice | Urban park | 48°44′05.68″ N | 16°45′11.31″ E |
| B2 | Pohansko | Natural | 48°43′37.68″ N | 16°53′08.35″ E | |
| B3 | Suchovské mlýny | Pastureland | 48°53′50.79″ N | 17°34′54.94″ E | |
| B4 | Proskovice | Natural | 49°44′51.73″ N | 18°12′23.45″ E | |
| B5 | Bělský les | Urban park | 49°47′5.65″ N | 18°14′28.29″ E | |
| Slovakia | C1 | SAS campus | Urban park | 48°10′14.58″ N | 17°04′1.15″ E |
| C2 | Mokrohájska street | Urban | 48°10′34.71″ N | 17°04′3.15″ E | |
| C3 | Železná studienka | Forest park | 48°12′14.16″ N | 17°05′47.05″ E | |
| C4 | Fúgelka | Natural | 48°22′44.14″ N | 17°18′52.86″ E | |
Primers and probes used in PCR reactions for the amplification of Anaplasma phagocytophilum gene fragments.
| Gene | Primers and Probes (P) | Sequences (5′-3′) | Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| ApMSP2f | ATGGAAGGTAGTGTTGGTTATGGTATT | [ |
| ApMSP2r | TTGGTCTTGAAGCGCTCGTA | ||
| ApMSP2p (P) | HEX-TGGTGCCAGGGTTGAGCTTGAGATTG-TAMRA | ||
| 1st amplification: | [ | ||
| ge3a | CACATGCAAGTCGAACGGATTATTC | ||
| ge10r | TTCCGTTAAGAAGGATCTAATCTCC | ||
| 2nd amplification: | |||
| ge9f | AACGGATTATTCTTTATAGCTTGCT | ||
| ge2 | GGCAGTATTAAAAGCAGCTCCAGG | ||
|
| EphplgroEL-A.phago-F | ATGGTATGCAGTTTGATCGC | [ |
| EphgroEL-A.phago-R | TTGAGTACAGCAACACCACCGGAA |
Frequency of Anaplasma phagocytophilum ecotypes identified in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks based on 16S rRNA and groEL gene sequences. In the logit model describing the probability that a particular ecotype is present in an I. ricinus tick, the only significant factors are presence/absence of roe deer and tick developmental stage.
| Roe Deer | Tick Stage | Country | Site | Landscape | Ecotype I | Ecotype II | Ecotype I & II |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Absent | A | Germany | A1 | UP | 14 | ||
| A3 | UP | 47 | |||||
| Czech | B3 | A | 1 | 2 | |||
| Republic | B5 | UP | 1 | 1 | |||
| Slovakia | C2 | U | 12 | 1 | |||
| N | Germany | A1 | UP | 3 | |||
| A3 | UP | 5 | |||||
| Czech | B3 | A | 1 | 4 | |||
| Republic | B5 | UP | 4 | 1 | |||
| SUBTOTAL | 87 | 3 | 7 | ||||
| % | 89.7 | 3.1 | 7.2 | ||||
| Present | A | Germany | A2 | UP | 8 | 8 | |
| A4 | FP | 5 | |||||
| A5 | A | 2 | 6 | ||||
| A6 | N | 1 | 10 | ||||
| Czech | B1 | UP | 5 | ||||
| Republic | B2 | N | 2 | 1 | |||
| B4 | N | 5 | |||||
| Slovakia | C1 | U | 13 | 6 | 1 | ||
| C3 | FP | 15 | 9 | 1 | |||
| C4 | N | 19 | 5 | 7 | |||
| N | Germany | A2 | UP | 1 | |||
| A6 | N | 2 | |||||
| Czech | B1 | UP | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||
| Republic | B4 | N | 3 | 2 | |||
| Slovakia | C1 | U | 7 | ||||
| C3 | FP | 7 | 9 | 2 | |||
| C4 | N | 5 | 5 | 1 | |||
| SUBTOTAL | 88 | 75 | 14 | ||||
| % | 49.7 | 42.4 | 7.9 | ||||
| TOTAL | 175 | 78 | 21 | ||||
| % | 63.9 | 28.5 | 7.7 |
A = adult; N = nymph; for site acronyms see Table 1. UP = urban park, FP = forest park, A = agricultural, pastureland, N = natural forest, U = urban.
Frequency of Anaplasma phagocytophilum variants identified in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks based on a fragment of the 16S rRNA sequence.
| Roe Deer | Tick Stage | Country | Site | Landscape | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | I | J | N | O | P | S | V | W | X | Y | Z | |||||
| Absent | A | Germany | A1 | UP | 13 | 1 | |||||||||||
| A3 | UP | 48 | |||||||||||||||
| Czech | B3 | A | 1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Republic | B5 | UP | 4 | ||||||||||||||
| Slovakia | C2 | U | 13 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| N | Germany | A1 | UP | 3 | |||||||||||||
| A3 | UP | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| Czech | B3 | A | 1 | 4 | |||||||||||||
| Republic | B5 | UP | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| SUBTOTAL | 93 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 1 | 1 | |||||||||||
| % | 90.3 | 1.0 | 1.0 | 5.8 | 1.0 | 1.0 | |||||||||||
| Present | A | Germany | A2 | UP | 8 | 1 | 7 | 1 | |||||||||
| A4 | FP | 3 | 2 | ||||||||||||||
| A5 | A | 2 | 1 | 2 | 3 | ||||||||||||
| A6 | N | 1 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||||||||||
| Czech | B1 | UP | 5 | ||||||||||||||
| Republic | B2 | N | 1 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| B4 | N | 6 | |||||||||||||||
| Slovakia | C1 | U | 14 | 1 | 5 | ||||||||||||
| C3 | FP | 15 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 1 | ||||||||||
| C4 | N | 13 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 7 | 3 | |||||||||
| N | Germany | A2 | UP | 1 | |||||||||||||
| A6 | N | 2 | |||||||||||||||
| Czech | B1 | UP | 2 | 1 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| Republic | B4 | N | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||||
| Slovakia | C1 | U | 4 | 4 | 1 | ||||||||||||
| C3 | FP | 7 | 2 | 9 | |||||||||||||
| C4 | N | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |||||||||||
| SUBTOTAL | 79 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 9 | 15 | 38 | 23 | 1 | |||||
| % | 42.0 | 3.2 | 1.1 | 1.1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 5.8 | 4.8 | 8.0 | 20.2 | 12.2 | 0.5 | |||||
| TOTAL | 172 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 10 | 21 | 39 | 24 | 1 | ||||
| % | 59.1 | 2.1 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 3.8 | 3.4 | 7.2 | 13.4 | 8.2 | 0.3 | ||||
A = adult; N = nymph; for site acronyms, see Table 1. Designation of 16S rRNA gene variants follows Schorn et al. [31] and Silaghi et al. [32]. UP = urban park, FP = forest park, A = agricultural, pastureland, N = natural forest, U = urban.
Mean prevalence of Anaplasma phagocytophilum in questing Ixodes ricinus ticks per site for the study period.
| Roe | Adults | Nymphs | TOTAL | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Country | Site | Landscape | Deer | Positive/Total | % | Positive/Total | % | Positive/Total | % |
| Germany | A1 | UP | - | 29/480 | 6.0 | 6/238 | 2.5 | 35/718 | 4.9 |
| A2 | UP | + | 24/491 | 4.9 | 2/260 | 0.8 | 26/751 | 3.5 | |
| A3 | UP | - | 93/475 | 19.6 | 9/240 | 3.7 | 102/715 | 14.3 | |
| A4 | FP | + | 8/390 | 2.0 | 1/226 | 0.4 | 9/606 | 1.5 | |
| A5 | A | + | 14/459 | 3.0 | 0/260 | 0 | 14/719 | 1.9 | |
| A6 | N | + | 24/305 | 7.9 | 4/240 | 0.8 | 28/545 | 5.1 | |
| Czech | B1 | UP | + | 11/178 | 6.2 | 6/237 | 2.5 | 17/415 | 4.1 |
| Republic | B2 | N | + | 3/37 | 8.1 | 0/170 | 0 | 3/207 | 1.4 |
| B3 | A | - | 5/86 | 5.8 | 7/456 | 1.5 | 12/542 | 2.2 | |
| B4 | N | + | 11/83 | 13.3 | 12/1114 | 1.1 | 23/1197 | 1.9 | |
| B5 | UP | - | 13/96 | 13.5 | 13/180 | 7.2 | 26/276 | 9.4 | |
| Slovakia | C1 | UP | + | 139/397 | 35.0 | 70/663 | 10.6 | 209/1060 | 19.7 |
| C2 | U | - | 23/193 | 11.9 | 0/13 | 0 | 23/206 | 11.2 | |
| C3 | FP | + | 47/344 | 13.7 | 32/404 | 7.9 | 79/748 | 10.6 | |
| C4 | N | + | 30/520 | 5.8 | 20/1362 | 1.5 | 50/1882 | 2.7 | |
Data are summarized from publications by Silaghi et al. [19], Overzier et al. [20], Venclikova et al. [22,23], and Svitálková et al. [24]. For site acronyms, see Table 1. UP = urban park, FP = forest park, A = agricultural, pastureland, N = natural forest, U = urban. +/- = presence/absence of roe deer.